Jaguars assistant is first male NFL ach to e out as gay - Los Angel Tim

Contents:

• ARE GAY MEN MORE F? OBY AND OVERWEIGHT DIFFERENC AMONG GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN
• JAGS' MAXEN IS FIRST MALE AMERIN PRO SPORTS ACH TO E OUT AS GAY
• PENIS SIZE AND PREFERRED SEXUAL ROL AMONG GAY MEN
• JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS' KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE COACH TO COME OUT AS GAY MAJOR U.S. SPORTS
• JAGUARS ASSISTANT KEV MAXEN IS FIRST MALE NFL ACH TO E OUT AS GAY
• KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE ACH A US MEN’S PROFSNAL SPORTS LEAGUE TO PUBLICLY E OUT AS GAY
• FAT GAY MEN

ARE GAY MEN MORE F? OBY AND OVERWEIGHT DIFFERENC AMONG GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN

Bisexual men are perceived to sound more mascule than men who are straight, acrdg to a study of Atralian subjects.Amics at the Universy of Sydney pared the voic of gay, straight and bisexual men a study volvg 160 people.In the rearch led by clil psychologist Jam Morandi, people were reced to analyse the voic of 60 men, 20 of whom were gay, 20 straight and 20 bisexual. They were then asked to rate the men on their sexual orientatn g a sle om zero (exclively heterosexual) to 10 (exclively homosexual).Listeners were also asked to rate each man’s perceived level of femy or masculy the voic on a siar sle.The men volved the study were asked to rerd themselv on a smartphone recg the first two l of the Atralian natnal anthem.Voice sampl were then modified to remove any background noise while volume levels were ma the same to ensure nsistency.Rults om the study showed listeners uld distguish between gay and straight men’s voic wh an accuracy of 62 per cent, apparently nsistent wh prev rearch.However, the study participants uld not terme any differenc between bisexual and straight men’s voic wh any gree of accuracy.

JAGS' MAXEN IS FIRST MALE AMERIN PRO SPORTS ACH TO E OUT AS GAY

The thors said their rearch showed bisexual men’s voic were perceived as beg more exclively attracted to women pared wh both gay and straight men’s voic.Bisexual men’s voic were rated as more mascule than both gay and straight men’s voic.Rearchers claimed the abily to intify a man’s bisexual inty om his voice alone uld have cril social implitns such as helpg to rce feelgs of alienatn.‘Voice may unter visibily many bisexuals feel’An abstract of the study, tled Can listeners tect if a man is bisexual om his voice alone, reads: “The prent study examed whether bisexual men n be intified om their voic ak to how gay men n be intified on their voice alone.“If this is the se, voice may be an important target of discrimatn on the one hand but may also unter the visibily many bisexuals feel (if their bisexual inti n be apprehend by their voice alone, whout explic disclosure required).“The fdgs may also she light on whether bisexual male voic, like gay male voic, differ om straight voic terms of their genr non-nformy – a qutn that to date has not been examed.”But amics noted the rearch was limed on the grounds all men who participated the study are Atralian, which may not be reflected among wir cultur.And the thors nced the study did not ntrol for the rerdg environment or microphone-to-mouth distance, which uld have affected the qualy of the voice sampl.The thors said the fdgs suggted that while the voic of bisexual men the sample were perceived as more mascule and attracted to femal, listeners did not associate this imprsn wh bisexualy.As a rult, while bisexual men may appear to be at lower risk of facg voice-based intifitn and discrimatn than gay men, they may often be mistaken as beg straight.The study was published the Journal of Sex Rearch. This seems to suggt that the public acceptance and unrstandg of sexualy and sexual orientatn may have changed, and that gay men, at least certa rol, are now more accepted, and perhaps even celebrated. Stereotypil gay mal may be portrayed as flamboyant, hypersexual, effemate, fashnable, th, and preoccupied wh body image (Madon, 1997; McLghl & Rodriguez, 2017; Rothmann, 2013), The last two stereotyp have potential relevance for several health out, cludg overweight and many margalized inti, sexual orientatn and sexualy have been narrowly fed based on certa behavrs, characteristics, and expectatns of what means to be a gay man Ameri.

A hypersexualized view of gay men suggts they are primarily visual creatur, and they sire sexual partners who are well kempt, attractive, and th. In fact, rearch suggts that gay men, more so than straight men, place a greater emphasis on physil attractivens orr to nform to bety ials and to be more sexually attractive (Siever, 1996; Wood, 2004).

In this chapter, we enavor to answer the qutn, are gay men ls likely to be characterized by oby or overweight than straight men? Dpe an expansive lerature the last few s on the quali and characteristics of gay and straight men, rearch that explor the prevalence of oby and overweight the gay male populatn is much more limed, pecially parg them to the straight male populatn.

PENIS SIZE AND PREFERRED SEXUAL ROL AMONG GAY MEN

We also exame the likelihood of overweight or oby gay mal pared to heterosexual first discs the ma approach ed the rearch lerature on the nceptualizatn and measurement of what means to be a gay or straight man. We next review the rather limed lerature about the prevalence of oby and overweight the gay male and straight male populatns. Quantative measur intify gay mal as those who are sexually oriented toward persons of the same sex, straight mal as those who are oriented toward persons of the oppose sex, and mal who are bisexual as those who are oriented towards persons of both sex.

Acrdg to the social nstctnist view, sexualy and sexual orientatn exist along a ntuum, wh varyg gre of homosexualy/heterosexualy. If the stereotype of gay mal as more physilly f and more mcular pared to straight mal is accurate, then BMI might be a particularly problematic measure studyg the te risks of oby as relat to sexual orientatn.

Acrdg to the CDC (2022), BMI is morately rrelated wh both the prevalence of those out and objectively better measur of body posn offered by more direct measur of body fat such as skld thickns measurements, belectril impedance, unrwater weighg, dual energy x-ray absorptmetry (DXA) and the like (see Denton & Karpe, 2016; Goyan, 2012; Scerpella et al., 2013 for more tailed discsns of the alternative methods) Gay Mal More or Ls Likely to Have Overweight and Oby than Straight Mal? The rults showed ls of a risk of overweight and oby among mal who are gay pared to those who are straight (Tuthill et al., 2020). In a siar study g self-reported data, Periera (2021) found that the stereotypil expectatns of gay men as th and f were fact associated wh lower risks of beg obe and overweight.

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS' KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE COACH TO COME OUT AS GAY MAJOR U.S. SPORTS

For example, Carpenter’s (2003) rearch shows that oby gay mal tends to crease the likelihood of a partnered relatnship pared to the likelihood for straight men, even when ntrollg for the overall lower percentag of partnerships among gay men.

At least one analysis suggts that gay mal may actually be at a greater risk of beg unrweight and malnourished to meet this “body fascist ‘no pecs; no sex’ world of metropolan gay masculy” (Richardson, 2015: 646). (2015) found that mal who are gay are ls likely to engage strenuo physil activy, perhaps for siar reasons as those for straight women, so as to be more appealg to rults of the limed rearch are mixed; some fd that sexual mory stat is associated wh healthier weights (Tuthill et al., 2020).

Others suggt that fact, gay men may be at a higher risk for unrweight due to perceived prsur to be th (Periera, 2021; Laska et al., 2015). Still other rearch has reported no statistilly signifint difference the BMI tegori of gay mal when pared to straight mal (Periera, 2021; Richardson, 2015). Rearchers have also documented other health related trends wh dispari between mal who are gay and mal who are straight, cludg a higher cince of smokg, creased accs to healthre, and creased mental health issu, which might impact weight and the cince of oby (Carpenter, 2003; Laska et al., 2015; Sang et al., 2021; Tuthill et al., 2020) this chapter, we attempt to addrs some of the voids and overe some of the nsistenci the lerature jt reviewed.

JAGUARS ASSISTANT KEV MAXEN IS FIRST MALE NFL ACH TO E OUT AS GAY

MeasurWe now discs the qutnnaire ems om the NSFG that we will e our analysis of gay mal and straight mal pertag to the three most mon dimensns of sexual orientatn, namely, sexual behavr, sexual attractn, and sexual self-intifitn. Of the 5206 male rponnts, 4207 have valid rpons, meang that they n be tegorized as behavg as eher straight mal or as gay mal. We have tegorized gay mal as those who are only or who are maly attracted to mal, while straight mal are those who report they are only or are maly attracted to femal.

We further rtrict our analys to those who also have valid rpons on the var dimensns of sexualy, th rultg analytic sampl of 3675 mal g the behavr dimensn of sexualy, 4028 mal g the attractn dimensn, and 3960 mal g the self-intifitn mentn one last fal pot about the analys to be prented below of oby and overweight among gay male and straight male rponnts g data om the 2017–2019 NSFG. RultsWe beg our analysis by examg the distributn of the BMI tegori among gay mal and straight mal; we do this three tim, tegorizg the mal as gay or straight each time acrdg to each of the three sexualy dimensns. After unrtakg the scriptive analys, we turn to logistic regrsn analys timatg equatns wh a pennt variable of sexual orientatn (gay or straight) and wh the pennt variabl of obe (one set of equatns) or obe/overweight (send set of equatns); each set ntas three equatns, one for each of the three sexualy first prent the scriptive analys.

KEV MAXEN BE FIRST MALE ACH A US MEN’S PROFSNAL SPORTS LEAGUE TO PUBLICLY E OUT AS GAY

We exame the distributn of all five body mass x (BMI) tegori among the gay male and straight male populatns to terme whether the distributns differ signifintly among the two populatns. 1 (top panel) prents data on the survey-adjted distributns of the BMI tegori among the 3675 gay mal and straight mal, acrdg to the behavr dimensn of sexualy. In sum, pared to straight mal, gay mal tend to be more characterized by normal weight and ls characterized by overweight and terme whether there is a statistilly signifint difference the distributn of the five BMI tegori among the gay mal pared to the distributn among the straight mal, we lculated a Pearson χ2 statistic which was then rrected for the survey sign wh a “send-orr rrectn” (Rao & Stt, 1984), and nverted to an F statistic.

23 dit that the gay male and straight male groups, tegorized by the behavr dimensn of sexualy, do not differ signifintly wh rpect to the distributn of the five BMI 16. 1 Distributns of BMI tegori among gay mal and straight mal, 20–49 years of age by each of three dimensns of sexualy: 2017–2019 Natnal Survey of Fay Growth (Survey adjted g NSFG rponnt samplg weights)Full size tableWe next exame the distributns of the BMI tegori among gay and straight mal, tegorized as beg eher straight or gay acrdg to the attractn dimensn of sexualy. Of the male rponnts the NSFG who are between the ag of 20 and 49 (meang they have valid BMI data), 4028 may be signated as gay or straight acrdg to the sexual attractn dimensn.

As wh the behavral dimensn, those men classified as gay on the basis of sexual attractn have much higher levels of normal weight, and they have ls overweight and oby pared to men who are attracted to women. Fally, we pare the BMI tegory distributns among the gay male and straight male populatns, distguishg the groups acrdg to their sexualy self-intifitn. Rell om our earlier discsn that of the male rponnts the 2017–2019 NSFG, more than 95% of them self-intify as eher gay or as straight.

FAT GAY MEN

In all three analys, we showed higher percentag of gay mal pared to straight mal the normal weight tegory, and lower percentag the overweight and obe tegori. But, only the analysis classifyg the sexual orientatn of the rponnts acrdg to the sexual attractn dimensn did we fd the distributn of the BMI tegori for gay mal to be signifintly different om the distributn for straight now foc on the oby and overweight variabl our parisons of gay mal wh straight mal. This will perm a more straightforward tt of the hypothis that gay mal are more f, that is, ls characterized by oby and overweight, than are straight mal.

0 or higher, and 0 if tegorized as unrweight or normal rather than lculatg chi-squared statistics based on cross-tabulatns of each of the two variabl wh whether the mal are gay or straight, as we reported Table 16. 1, we opted to f a logistic regrsn equatn wh the gay male dummy variable (gay male = 1) as the pennt variable, and the oby dummy variable (obe = 1) as the pennt variable one equatn, and then the overweight/obe dummy variable as the pennt variable a send equatn. We are not g the oby and overweight/obe pennt variabl the logistic regrsn equatns to predict the likelihood of a male beg gay or straight.

We are g the logistic equatn rults to dite whether gay mal are signifintly different om straight mal on the overweight/obe variable(s) Table 16. 2 we prent the rults of one logistic regrsn equatn examg the log odds relatnship between the dummy variable of gay male and the pennt variable of oby, and then the rults of a send logistic regrsn equatn but wh the pennt variable of overweight or obe. 2 prents for gay mal and straight mal, so signated acrdg to the behavr dimensn of sexualy, the log equatn rults of the gay male dummy variable regrsed on the obe dummy variable; and next the rults of the equatn regrsg the gay male dummy variable on the overweight or obe dummy variable.