The Revolutnary War Hero Who Was Openly Gay | HISTORY

Contents:

• WHAT HAPPENED WHEN A GAY COMMUNIST WROTE TO STAL
• GAY LIFE STAL’S GULAG
• THE REVOLUTNARY WAR HERO WHO WAS OPENLY GAY
• 1917 RSIAN REVOLUTN: THE GAY MUNY'S BRIEF WDOW OF EEDOM
• ERNST RöHM, THE HIGHT-RANKG GAY NAZI
• WAS STAL GAY

WHAT HAPPENED WHEN A GAY COMMUNIST WROTE TO STAL

Naturally, the society that arose out of the nservative Rsian monarchy, not even the munists were unanimo on the matters: Whyte noted the disapproval of homosexualy by his superr, Mikhail Borod, although he add that Borod neverthels nsired a personal matter, and nsired Whyte a good munist.

GAY LIFE STAL’S GULAG

He sentially summarized differg pots of view existg wh the Bolshevik Party at the time: one which nsired homosexualy to be a sign of “bourgeois generacy, ” and another which believed that gay liberatn is part of the stggle for universal emancipatn. Naturally, he belonged to the latter mp and th nsired “the ndn of homosexuals who are eher of workg-class orig or workers themselv to be analogo to the ndn of women unr the palist regime and the lored rac who are opprsed by imperialism. However, Whyte refers to Mar van r Lubbe, a Dutch munist who was executed for allegedly settg fire to the Reichstag, as a provotr and a “perast” – a term which has been historilly ed to imply a nnectn between homosexualy and pedophilia.

THE REVOLUTNARY WAR HERO WHO WAS OPENLY GAY

In general, he seems to have partially accepted the newly-troduced belief that there is ed somethg “generate” and “bourgeois” about certa gay people but ntrasted this to natural homosexualy such as his own. He had fully ternalized the Bolshevik ethos: throughout his letter, we unrstand that his openg qutn, “n a homosexual be nsired someone worthy of membership the Communist Party, ” is not merely rhetoril.

1917 RSIAN REVOLUTN: THE GAY MUNY'S BRIEF WDOW OF EEDOM

Ironilly, as a gay man, he found far easier to live unr var dictatorships than unr the Brish monarchy, perhaps bee, as a foreigner and a Brish cizen, he was relatively untertg and harmls to most lol thori. This terview troduc the work of acclaimed historian Dan Healey, who sheds light on how gay men survived the Soviet Gulag, their life afterwards and different attus the USSR to gay men and Healey, Profsor of Morn Rsian History at Oxford Universy, has explored the history of homosexualy tsarist and Soviet Rsia, the nature of masculy unr socialism, the problems of sexual disorrs and sexual vlence the USSR and the history of medice Stal’s Gulag. Healey is the thor of the only published monograph on the history of homosexualy Rsia: Homosexual Dire Revolutnary Rsia: The Regulatn of Sexual and Genr Gkov spoke to Dan Healey after the lnch of his latt book: Rsian Homophobia om Stal to do we know about gay/queer people Gulag?

That giv you a kd of snapshot of the posn of the group of people imprisoned for their homosexualy unr Article 154-a of the RSFSR Penal relatns between men were punishable by imprisonment of between three and five years, and sexual relatns between men wh the e of vlence or the subjugatn of one party to the other were punishable by imprisonment of between five and eight subjects of your book were not only people arrted unr Article 154-a. It’s known that 1933 Genrikh Yagoda, the head of the Soviet secret police, wrote a letter to Stal which he said that “homosexuals are beg arrted, but we have realised that we don’t have an article to charge them unr. Also, “outg”, the public disclosure of rmatn about gays’ sexual orientatn, uld, an atmosphere of public homophobia, bee a potential risk for blackmail by foreign telligence polil terpretatn of this “crime” was the reason for the severy of sentenc unr Article 154-a, as “polils” were “socially hostile” mat the Soviet prison mp system.

Public ’s nearly impossible to answer the qutns, bee few even amongst the most ted of Gulag mat left any wrten documentatn behd, given the homophobia of Soviet society and the all-embracg fear the populatn. Koz’s se is tertg bee he left a diary which he had kept all his adult life, and part of , the entri for 1955-1956, has been even Koz don’t speak about his own homosexual experienc, if he had any, the mps. The younger partner a male gay relatnship would sometim bee more feme and even take a female name, and an equivalent velopment might take place a lbian society bee more homophobic after the Gulag was closed down?

ERNST RöHM, THE HIGHT-RANKG GAY NAZI

One famo se was that of filmmaker Sergey Paradjanov, who was arrted and imprisoned several tim for his homosexualy, the first time ’s well known that there were gays and bisexuals the polil and cultural el of the Stal era.

WAS STAL GAY

The letter seems fact to have been a piece of provotn on the part of the OGPU, signed to jtify arrtg gays the terts of natnal another letter to Stal, the OGPU proposed more severe sentenc for public exprsns of homosexualy and for payment for sex between men. One document om the Stal era (disvered by historian Ira Rolduga) talks about the fact that when 1932-1933 open gay men Lengrad suggted havg relatns wh straight men, the latter rpond wh vlence and aggrsn.

I thk that for Stal, homosexualy was a “male” issue, nnected to natnal and his circle did not approve of women’s emancipatn: there was not a sgle woman the PolburoWomen, on the other hand, didn’t serve the armed forc and weren’t particularly active the secury ans, so they were ls of a risk. What needs to be stated is that Soviet legal and medil opn on this qutn was no different than what was generally accepted the world at large, namely, that homosexualy was a psycho-sexual disorr, a form of mental illns. Moreover, I thk should also be poted out that, spe the view that homosexualy was a mental disorr, the actual law qutn, Article 121 of the Soviet Crimal Co, was pretty much only enforced s of pedophilia, wh some 800 – 1000 prosecutns annually.