Five years after the US Supreme Court clared a fundamental right for same-sex upl to marry, the jtic produced another landmark for the gay rights movement by lg that feral anti-bias law vers lns of gay, lbian and transgenr workers.
Contents:
- KAVANGH C LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS S ARGUMENT ABOUT ABORTN RTRICTNS
- BRETT KAVANGH'S OPN ON GAY MARRIAGE IS BACKED BY A NOTOR ANTI-LGBTQ GROUP
- ABORTN, RACE, GAY RIGHTS, ATH PENALTY: SUPREME COURT NOMEE BRETT KAVANGH ULD MAKE THE DIFFERENCE
- BRETT KAVANGH'S ANSWER TO THIS QUTN ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE WILL GIVE YOU PSE
- KAVANGH, A GAY ROOMMATE, A DEAD PIGEON
KAVANGH C LANDMARK GAY RIGHTS S ARGUMENT ABOUT ABORTN RTRICTNS
The US Supreme Court voted on Monday to protect LGBTQ Amerins om workplace discrimatn a landmark lg that has stunned jt about everybody a untry where gay and transgenr rights are unr attack om the extraordary 6-3 lg meant once aga meant Brett Kavana... * kavanaugh gay *
However, cg two landmark gay rights s — Lawrence v. ”The lawyers who argued favor of gay rights the landmark LGBTQ s offered differg views on the validy of the argument by Kavangh, who was appoted 2018 by then-Print Donald Bonto, who argued on behalf of same-sex upl Obergefell v.
’ The end, ” she advot largely agreed wh Bonto, sayg that the landmark gay rights cisns Obergefell v. Tmp's choice has left many LGBTQ advot on edge, and 's no wonr: Brett Kavangh's opn on gay marriage is backed by an anti-LGBTQ group. The Fay Rearch Council is a vol opponent of gay rights and has lled homosexualy "disgtg" and "unnatural.
BRETT KAVANGH'S OPN ON GAY MARRIAGE IS BACKED BY A NOTOR ANTI-LGBTQ GROUP
" Kavangh has not aligned himself wh the group's strong anti-LGBTQ stance, and 's unclear what he thks about gay rights. "Though Kavangh’s rerd on gay rights is a "relatively blank slate, " as The Daily Beast lled , LGBT activists still worry Kavangh uld rtrict or overturn the gay muny's nstutnal right to marriage. While Kavangh's thoughts on same-sex marriage and gay rights are not transparent, you n certaly tell where anti-LGBTQ activists stand.
The US Supreme Court voted on Monday to protect LGBTQ Amerins om workplace discrimatn a landmark lg that has stunned jt about everybody a untry where gay and transgenr rights are unr attack om the extraordary 6-3 lg meant once aga meant Brett Kavangh, who dissented, faced loathg on the Inter, and the surprisg "hero" of the day was Neil Gorsuch — a nservative judge recently appoted by real champns were, of urse, the activists and lawyers at the centre of the cisn.
Here’s a breakdown of everythg you should know about this groundbreakg se and s nsequenc: The cisnThe top urt the US led that employers who fire workers for beg gay or transgenr are breakg the untry's civil rights laws.
ABORTN, RACE, GAY RIGHTS, ATH PENALTY: SUPREME COURT NOMEE BRETT KAVANGH ULD MAKE THE DIFFERENCE
"An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex, " he!! 1592230588It also a time of renewed awarens of embedd racism and homophobia, as well as durg Pri month.
1592252162Brett Kavangh's dissentWhile many Amerin were overwhelmed wh joy about the cisn, Twter ers were quick to nmn nservative Kavangh for votg agast rep: Brett Kavangh thks you n be fired om a job for beg gay or trans but hired for a job for beg a credibly acced rapist. A CNN headle read, "Why Tmp's Supreme Court appotee Neil Gorsuch jt protected LGBTQ rights" and many were exced by his seemg change of polil gorsuch heard chromati and said maybe the gays have a pot — Terron Moore (@Terron Moore). Five years after the US Supreme Court clared a fundamental right for same-sex upl to marry, the jtic produced another landmark for the gay rights movement by lg that feral anti-bias law vers lns of gay, lbian and transgenr workers.
The lg jos the annals of high urt cisns over the last quarter century that have helped drive gay progrs on myriad onts, cludg the 2003 cisn strikg down statut that crimalized sodomy and a 2013 actn that validated a feral law that nied married same-sex upl the Social Secury and other benefs given oppose-sex married upl. Equally signifint, the cisn was joed by Chief Jtice John Roberts, who had never signed an opn endorsg gay rights.
BRETT KAVANGH'S ANSWER TO THIS QUTN ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE WILL GIVE YOU PSE
Gorsuch said the “msage” of the law is “simple and momento: An dividual’s homosexualy or transgenr stat is not relevant to employment cisns. That’s bee is impossible to discrimate agast a person for beg homosexual or transgenr whout discrimatg agast that dividual based on sex. More than 7 ln people the US intify as lbian, gay, bisexual or transgenr, acrdg to the Williams Instute at UCLA.
In his 15 years as chief jtice, Roberts’ dissent the 2015 gay marriage se marked his first and only oral dissent om the bench. Jtice Brett Kavangh, dissentg, tried to emphasize that he was not agast gay rights and noted the historic nature of the cisn.
“This Court has prevly stated, and I fully agree, that gay and lbian Amerins ‘nnot be treated as social outsts or as ferr digny and worth.
KAVANGH, A GAY ROOMMATE, A DEAD PIGEON
The Tmp admistratn had argued agast Monday’s oute, and the lg may have seemed improbable after the 2018 retirement of Jtice Anthony Kennedy, who had been the thor of all gay rights opns datg to 1996 and was often the cidg vote on a bench riven on the cultural dilemma.
They were brought on behalf of two gay men fired om their jobs, as a skydivg stctor and a child welfare servic ordator, and on behalf of a transgenr woman who lost her posn as a funeral home director. The employers argued that firg gay or transgenr dividuals did not vlate Tle VII.