This article claims that three mon arguments agast gay marriage - the fnal, procreatn, and slippery-slope arguments - are que bad, the worst of the lot. The fnal argument asserts that marriage jt is the unn of one man and one woman, and that the fn alone is a sufficient fense agast claims for gay marriage. The procreatn argument claims that marriage's central public purpose is to enurage procreatn, and so the excln of same-sex upl is jtified. The slippery-slope argument claims that the acceptance of same-sex marriage logilly entails the acceptance of other public policy chang - notably the acceptance of polygamy - that would themselv be bad, pennt of whether gay marriage is bad. While each argument has some appeal, and each has adherents both si and outsi the legal amy, each is badly flawed as a matter of logic, experience, polics, or some batn of the three. The article suggts that the tert of focg on the most important ncerns about gay marriage, mentators should move on to other arguments agast that seem stronger and th better tt the affirmative se for gay marriage.
Contents:
- SCOTUS GAY MARRIAGE: PROCREATN
- SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
- PROCREATN AND GAY MARRIAGE: A FOLLOWUP
- ARGUMENTS AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: MARRIAGE IS FOR PROCREATN
SCOTUS GAY MARRIAGE: PROCREATN
The Jtic challenge the lawyers about what’s bt for children—and what the rights of fertile heterosexual upl say about gay marriage. * gay marriage procreation *
[Stephen] What precisely is the way which allowg gay upl to marrywould terfere wh the visnof marriage as procreatn of childrenthat allowg sterile uplof different sex to marry would not?
I mean, there are lots of people who get marriedwho n't have take a state that do allow adoptn and say, there what's the jtifitn for sayg no gay marriage? Scholars and the general public beme creasgly terted the issue durg the late 20th century, a perd when attus toward homosexualy and laws regulatg homosexual behavur were liberalized, particularly wtern Europe and the Uned issue of same-sex marriage equently sparked emotnal and polil clash between supporters and opponents. Cultur that openly accepted homosexualy, of which there were many, generally had nonmaral tegori of partnership through which such bonds uld be exprsed and socially regulated.
Relig and secular expectatns of marriage and sexualy Over time the historil and tradnal cultur origally rerd by the lik of Bachofen and Man slowly succumbed to the homogenizatn imposed by lonialism. In other s, the cultural homogeney supported by the domant relign did not rult the applitn of doctre to the civic realm but may nohels have fostered a smoother seri of discsns among the cizenry: Belgium and Spa had legalized same-sex marriage, for stance, spe official opposn om their predomant relig stutn, the Roman Catholic Church. Most of the world religns have at some pots their histori opposed same-sex marriage for one or more of the followg stated reasons: homosexual acts vlate natural law or dive tentns and are therefore immoral; passag sacred texts nmn homosexual acts; and relig tradn regniz only the marriage of one man and one woman as valid.
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
Opposn to gay unns has been swept away. Will relig rights go next? * gay marriage procreation *
The Unarian Universalist church and the gay-oriented Universal Fellowship of Metropolan Communy Church fully accepted same-sex marriage. G., male-female, man-woman, gay-straight) and to replace the wh tegori or ntua that they believed better reflect the actual practic of humany.
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
Proponents ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, opponents ague that marriage is primarily for procreatn. * gay marriage procreation *
In 1981, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnership, which also granted hospal visatn rights and other benefs. Bh that would outlaw same-sex marriag the whole untry, ten typilly nservative tat along wh Oregon enacted state-level bans on gay marriag.
PROCREATN AND GAY MARRIAGE: A FOLLOWUP
Hoe legislatn difyg protectns for gay marriage passed spe the fact that a big majory of the Hoe Republin uc opposed . * gay marriage procreation *
In 2010, Massachetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, found Sectn 3 of DOMA that fed marriage as a unn between one man and one woman to be unnstutnal, 2013, Uned Stat v. By 2015 (the year Obergefell was cid) thirty-six stat already issued marriage licens to same-sex upl and more than 20 unti around the world had already legalized gay marriage, startg wh the Netherlands 2000. Judge Heyburn held that “homosexual persons nstute a quasi-spect class, ” and clared that Kentucky’s law banng same-sex marriag vlat the Equal Protectn Clse of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uned Stat Constutn.
ARGUMENTS AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: MARRIAGE IS FOR PROCREATN
gay marriage, marriage and procreatn, lbian marriage, same-sex marriage, gay parents, goodridge, heather anrson, llie christian, kg unty, civil marriage, creatn of fai, gays n´t procreat - Procreatn, Marriage, and Gays - Gay/Lbian Relatnships at BellaOnle * gay marriage procreation *
They talk about the risks to parentg, when there is no evince that suggts that gay and lbian upl are worse parents, pecially when pared to dysfunctnal upl tradnal marriag or sgle parents of limed fancial means. The ernment n offer s subsidi to some groups but not to others, and so dog, force small isolated groups to subsidize powerful gay rights anizatns. We th face a ser risk the aftermath of Obergefell: liberty gay rights will turn out to be a one-way street.
The ia that gay upl n't marry bee of the disnnect between homosexualy and procreatn cuts across many arguments agast marriage." emprop="scriptn * gay marriage procreation *
As I wre, the gay rights movement is gearg up to expand the spe of the antidiscrimatn laws hog and labor markets.
Homosexual upl g vro fertilizatn (IVF) or surrogate mothers liberately create a class of children who will live apart om their mother or father.
Although homosexual men are ls likely to have children than lbians, homosexual men are and will be raisg children.