This article claims that three mon arguments agast gay marriage - the fnal, procreatn, and slippery-slope arguments - are que bad, the worst of the lot. The fnal argument asserts that marriage jt is the unn of one man and one woman, and that the fn alone is a sufficient fense agast claims for gay marriage. The procreatn argument claims that marriage's central public purpose is to enurage procreatn, and so the excln of same-sex upl is jtified. The slippery-slope argument claims that the acceptance of same-sex marriage logilly entails the acceptance of other public policy chang - notably the acceptance of polygamy - that would themselv be bad, pennt of whether gay marriage is bad. While each argument has some appeal, and each has adherents both si and outsi the legal amy, each is badly flawed as a matter of logic, experience, polics, or some batn of the three. The article suggts that the tert of focg on the most important ncerns about gay marriage, mentators should move on to other arguments agast that seem stronger and th better tt the affirmative se for gay marriage.
Contents:
- SCOTUS GAY MARRIAGE: PROCREATN
- SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
- PROCREATN AND GAY MARRIAGE: A FOLLOWUP
- ARGUMENTS AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: MARRIAGE IS FOR PROCREATN
SCOTUS GAY MARRIAGE: PROCREATN
The Jtic challenge the lawyers about what’s bt for children—and what the rights of fertile heterosexual upl say about gay marriage. * gay marriage procreation *
[Stephen] What precisely is the way which allowg gay upl to marrywould terfere wh the visnof marriage as procreatn of childrenthat allowg sterile uplof different sex to marry would not? I mean, there are lots of people who get marriedwho n't have take a state that do allow adoptn and say, there what's the jtifitn for sayg no gay marriage?
Scholars and the general public beme creasgly terted the issue durg the late 20th century, a perd when attus toward homosexualy and laws regulatg homosexual behavur were liberalized, particularly wtern Europe and the Uned issue of same-sex marriage equently sparked emotnal and polil clash between supporters and opponents.
Cultur that openly accepted homosexualy, of which there were many, generally had nonmaral tegori of partnership through which such bonds uld be exprsed and socially regulated. Relig and secular expectatns of marriage and sexualy Over time the historil and tradnal cultur origally rerd by the lik of Bachofen and Man slowly succumbed to the homogenizatn imposed by lonialism. In other s, the cultural homogeney supported by the domant relign did not rult the applitn of doctre to the civic realm but may nohels have fostered a smoother seri of discsns among the cizenry: Belgium and Spa had legalized same-sex marriage, for stance, spe official opposn om their predomant relig stutn, the Roman Catholic Church.
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
Opposn to gay unns has been swept away. Will relig rights go next? * gay marriage procreation *
Most of the world religns have at some pots their histori opposed same-sex marriage for one or more of the followg stated reasons: homosexual acts vlate natural law or dive tentns and are therefore immoral; passag sacred texts nmn homosexual acts; and relig tradn regniz only the marriage of one man and one woman as valid. The Unarian Universalist church and the gay-oriented Universal Fellowship of Metropolan Communy Church fully accepted same-sex marriage.
G., male-female, man-woman, gay-straight) and to replace the wh tegori or ntua that they believed better reflect the actual practic of humany.
In 1981, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnership, which also granted hospal visatn rights and other benefs.
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
Proponents ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, opponents ague that marriage is primarily for procreatn. * gay marriage procreation *
Bh that would outlaw same-sex marriag the whole untry, ten typilly nservative tat along wh Oregon enacted state-level bans on gay marriag. In 2010, Massachetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, found Sectn 3 of DOMA that fed marriage as a unn between one man and one woman to be unnstutnal, 2013, Uned Stat v.
By 2015 (the year Obergefell was cid) thirty-six stat already issued marriage licens to same-sex upl and more than 20 unti around the world had already legalized gay marriage, startg wh the Netherlands 2000. Judge Heyburn held that “homosexual persons nstute a quasi-spect class, ” and clared that Kentucky’s law banng same-sex marriag vlat the Equal Protectn Clse of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uned Stat Constutn. They talk about the risks to parentg, when there is no evince that suggts that gay and lbian upl are worse parents, pecially when pared to dysfunctnal upl tradnal marriag or sgle parents of limed fancial means.
The ernment n offer s subsidi to some groups but not to others, and so dog, force small isolated groups to subsidize powerful gay rights anizatns.
PROCREATN AND GAY MARRIAGE: A FOLLOWUP
Hoe legislatn difyg protectns for gay marriage passed spe the fact that a big majory of the Hoe Republin uc opposed . * gay marriage procreation *
We th face a ser risk the aftermath of Obergefell: liberty gay rights will turn out to be a one-way street. As I wre, the gay rights movement is gearg up to expand the spe of the antidiscrimatn laws hog and labor markets. Homosexual upl g vro fertilizatn (IVF) or surrogate mothers liberately create a class of children who will live apart om their mother or father.
Although homosexual men are ls likely to have children than lbians, homosexual men are and will be raisg children. A number of leadg profsnal associatns have asserted that there are "no differenc" between children raised by homosexuals and those raised by heterosexuals. Soclogist Steven Nock of the Universy of Virgia, who is agnostic on the issue of same-sex civil marriage, offered this review of the lerature on gay parentg as an expert wns for a Canadian urt nsirg legalizatn of same-sex civil marriage:.
ARGUMENTS AGAST GAY MARRIAGE: MARRIAGE IS FOR PROCREATN
gay marriage, marriage and procreatn, lbian marriage, same-sex marriage, gay parents, goodridge, heather anrson, llie christian, kg unty, civil marriage, creatn of fai, gays n´t procreat - Procreatn, Marriage, and Gays - Gay/Lbian Relatnships at BellaOnle * gay marriage procreation *
Evince suggts children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience genr and sexual disorrs.
Although the evince on child out is sketchy, do suggt that children raised by lbians or homosexual men are more likely to experience genr and sexual disorrs. Neverthels, th studi give some crence to nservative ncerns about the effects of homosexual parentg. In the first edn of his book fense of same-sex marriage, Virtually Normal, homosexual mentator Andrew Sullivan wrote: "There is more likely to be greater unrstandg of the need for extramaral outlets between two men than between a man and a woman.
The ia that gay upl n't marry bee of the disnnect between homosexualy and procreatn cuts across many arguments agast marriage." emprop="scriptn * gay marriage procreation *
It is plsible to spect that legal regnn of homosexual civil marriage would have siar nsequenc for the stutn of marriage; that is, would further stabilize the norm that adults should sacrifice to get and stay married for the sake of their children. Homosexual civil marriage would make even easier than already is for men to ratnalize their abandonment of their children. If the distctive sexual patterns of "mted" gay upl are any ditn (see above), is unlikely that homosexual marriage would domtite men the way that heterosexual marriage do.
It is also extremely unlikely that the blogil effects of heterosexual marriage on men would also be found homosexual marriage. Th, gay activists who argue that same-sex civil marriage will domtite gay men are, all likelihood, clgg to a foolish hope. On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court led that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constutn all 50 stat.
US public opn had shifted signifintly over the years, om 27% approval of gay marriage 1996 to 55% 2015, the year beme legal throughout the Uned Stat, to 61% 2019. Proponents of legal gay marriage ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, and that same-sex upl should have accs to all the benefs enjoyed by different-sex upl. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Da County Circu Court Judge Sarah Zabel led Florida’s gay marriage ban unnstutnal and stated that the ban “serv only to hurt, to discrimate, to prive same-sex upl and their fai of equal digny, to label and treat them as send-class cizens, and to em them unworthy of participatn one of the fundamental stutns of our society.