Contents:
- INCLIVE SEXUAL HEALTH EDUTN FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENR,
- REVIEWSEXUALY TN CLUDG LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENR (LGBT) ISSU SCHOOLS
INCLIVE SEXUAL HEALTH EDUTN FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENR,
Lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, queer, and qutng (LGBTQ) youth need and serve to learn settgs that are clive of their experienc and that give them the tn necsary to stay safe and healthy. Support your school’s Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA).
No promo homo Rearch Brief - Laws prohibg the “promotn of homosexualy” (often referred to as “no promo homo” laws), are lol or state tn laws that exprsly forbid teachers of health/sexualy tn om discsg lbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) people or topics a posive light – if at all.
"But on the other si of the , five stat allow negative rmatn on homosexualy and/or a posive ph for heterosexualy.
REVIEWSEXUALY TN CLUDG LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENR (LGBT) ISSU SCHOOLS
" Winer Universy's Interdisciplary Sexualy Rearch Collaborative is behd the webse, aimed at providg sex tn to Black gay and bisexual webs prove ccial, nsirg how often people pepper their search eng wh qutns – particularly about taboo topics, Sron says.
Although the laws are often referred to as “no promo homo” laws, Rosky (2017) suggts that there are five typ of anti-LGBTQ+ curriculum legislatn: “don’t say gay, ” “no promo homo, ” “anti-homo, ” “promo hetero, ” and “abstence until marriage. ” While the laws stem mostly om HIV-epimic-era homophobia, they also center narrow views of sexual and reproductive health that have been ed to systematilly discrimate agast poor people, people of lor, and people wh disabili (see Barcelos, 2020; Betts, 2021). The Gay, Lbian, and Straight Edutn Network (2019) found that only 19.
A 2019 study by the Gay, Lbian, and Straight Edutn Network (GLSEN) found that only 8. Gay and bisexual adult men (Curr & Hubach, 2020) and trans people (Hobai, Schofield, & Kwon, 2019) both retrospectively report a sire for more prehensive and clive sex tn.