<strong>Nick Herbert</strong>: Labour n't bear the ia that gay people, too, are repelled by them, and are turng to a changed Tory party
Contents:
- GAY AND TRANS RIGHTS ISSU DIVI BOTH TORI AND LABOUR
- A CONSERVATIVE VIEW OF GAY RIGHTS
- ON GAY RIGHTS, THE CONSERVATIV ARE STILL, UNSURPRISGLY, NSERVATIVE
GAY AND TRANS RIGHTS ISSU DIVI BOTH TORI AND LABOUR
Beg straightforward about your posn on gay rights is que easy. Hereâ?Ts how: â?oIâ?Tm for them.â?? Or, if you happen to be a shty person: â?oIâ?Tm agast them.â?? Or, if you happen to be part of the Department for Edutn, somethg along the l of: Iâ?Tm for them. They should be tght schools. Itâ?Ts nonsense that they should be tght schools. No, â?Ts nonsense that * conservatives vs labour gay rights *
But gay and trans rights are no longer the wedge issue they were the early ghts. Although s state ernment is ntrolled by Republins at every level, Utah has some of the strongt protectns for gay and trans people the natn. I worked on the mpaign to pass , and found that Republins were far more open to gay rights if a bill simply rpected the protectns, and Democrats were able to get behd as well.
A CONSERVATIVE VIEW OF GAY RIGHTS
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTAlong Wh Conservative Triumphs, Signs of New Ctn at Supreme CourtChief Jtice Roberts livered both landmark victori for the right and signifint lgs which he fed allianc wh the liberal Supreme Court’s story this term is nsirably more plited than the narrative of a nservative juggernt that emerged the prev Holston/The New York TimThe Supreme Court end s term this week faiar fashn, issug blockbter nservative cisns on affirmative actn, gay rights and stunt loans that divid along partisan l, wh the urt’s three Democratic appote not que as stunng as last June’s cisns elimatg the right to abortn and expandg gun rights, the new lgs were of a piece wh them and were a further ditn that the urt remas receptive to the nservative legal movement’s agenda, cludg cuttg back on a progrsive nceptn of civil rights and tratg Print Bin’s the entire story of the most recent term is nsirably more plited than that of the prev one, which had seemed to tablish an unyieldg nservative juggernt characterized by impatience and ambn — and built to last. The group filed briefs 18 argued s and was on the wng si 11 of Cole, the group’s natnal legal director, said loss the affirmative actn and gay rights s were “unprecented setbacks for equaly. ”ImageThe Supreme Court issued blockbter nservative cisns on affirmative actn, stunt loans and gay rights, but the urt’s liberals end up the majory several signifint Schaff/The New York TimMost of the data this article ncerns signed cisns issued by the urt after full briefg and argument.
ON GAY RIGHTS, THE CONSERVATIV ARE STILL, UNSURPRISGLY, NSERVATIVE
When viewed through the lens of other right wg beliefs, however, be creasgly unclear as to why the barriers between nservative iologi and gay rights even exist the first place. Why, then, should nservativ support the rtrictn of gay rights?