A small terie of groups now prise the hard re of the anti-gay movement
Contents:
- GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
- 18 ANTI-GAY GROUPS AND THEIR PROPAGANDA
- WHAT DO YOU SAY TO ‘THAT’S SO GAY’ & OTHER ANTI-LGBTQ+ COMMENTS?
GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
* anti lgbt speech *
“Globohomo”Screenshot, TelegramDavid Futrelle’s well-known onle misogyny trackg se, We Hunted The Mammoth scrib this multi-purpose right-wg troll ventn as havg emerged 2016 and offers this summary of s hateful batn of homophobia and anti-Semism: “Ostensibly, ‘globohomo’ is short for ‘global homogenizatn, ’ an alleged vast nspiracy to stroy ‘tradnal’ culture and valu and replace them wh a sort of global (naturally) rporate uniculture.
18 ANTI-GAY GROUPS AND THEIR PROPAGANDA
Universy of Virgia Law School’s Craig Konnoth says the Supreme Court’s First Amendment doctre is divisive—anti-gay speech enjoys strong Constutnal protectn, and pro-gay speech protectn grows progrsively weaker. * anti lgbt speech *
ImageLorie Smh said her Christian fah requir her to turn away ctomers seekg servic to celebrate same-sex Woolf for The New York TimThe Supreme Court sid on Friday wh a web signer Colorado who said she had a First Amendment right to refe to sign weddg webs for same-sex upl spe a state law that forbids discrimatn agast gay people. The liberal jtic viewed as somethg else entirely — a dispute that threatened societal protectns for gay rights and rolled back some recent an impassned dissent, Jtice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the oute signaled a return to a time when people of lor and other mory groups faced open discrimatn.
WHAT DO YOU SAY TO ‘THAT’S SO GAY’ & OTHER ANTI-LGBTQ+ COMMENTS?
Kavangh and Amy Coney Barrett, shifted the urt to the urts have generally sid wh gay and lbian upl who were refed service by bakeri, florists and others, lg that potential ctomers are entled to equal treatment, at least parts of the untry wh laws forbiddg discrimatn based on sexual owners of bs challengg those laws have argued that the ernment should not force them to choose between the requirements of their fahs and their livelihoods. Irish-Amerin Gay, Lbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., a se om 1995 which the urt sid wh the anizers of a veterans para that blocked a group of gay, lbian and bisexual people om marchg the event. Jtice Sotomayor seemed pecially ncerned about the way the urt’s opn would send a disapprovg msage to the public about people who are gay, lbian, bisexual or transgenr, or who were same-sex relatnships.