THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO: SATIRE OR REALITY? Bradlee Dean is eher poorly rearched or tentnally tend to cieve and ce anti-gay activism
Contents:
- MICHAEL SWIFT’S GAY AGENDA: GAY RANT OR NEW WORLD ORR PROCLAMATN?
- REHG HONTY … EXCERPT OM MICHAEL SWIFT’S ESSAY; GAY REVOLUTNARY
- GAY HISTORY – READ: THE GAY REVOLUTNARY A.K.A. THE GAY MANIFTO BY MICHAEL SWIFT – 1987
- THE GAY COMMUNY NEWS PUBLISH A SATIRE BY MICHAEL SWIFT THAT HAS SADLY BEE REALY THIRTY YEARS LATER
MICHAEL SWIFT’S GAY AGENDA: GAY RANT OR NEW WORLD ORR PROCLAMATN?
* michael swift gay *
” That was what Michael Swift, a “gay revolutnary, ” clared a Febary 1987 issue of the Gay Communy News. “Michael Swift” was a psdonym, and the first le of the now-famo homosexual rant – which was even reprted the Congrsnal Rerd – claimed that the entire piece was a “cel fantasy” that explaed “how the opprsed sperately dream of beg the opprsor. The “dream” was filled wh a nightmare scenar that seemed like somethg out of a fascist up d’etat: “All laws banng homosexual activy will be revoked.
As the article found s way to Christian publitns, believers were horrified, and homosexual activists tried to make light of s ntents, claimg that was tend merely as a satire. Intifyg the opponentWhether or not the ravgs of this “gay revolutnary” were tend as satire, what is strikg is the remarkable succs of the plan found wh the article. Texas (2003) strikg down sodomy laws – has been brought to heel by gay activists?
Or that Hollywood has eely mted s tremendo rourc to the fight for homosexual legimacy?
REHG HONTY … EXCERPT OM MICHAEL SWIFT’S ESSAY; GAY REVOLUTNARY
GAY MANIFESTO: REAL OR SATIRE? WRITTEN BY A NEW WORLD ORDER PUPPET OR A HOMOSEXUAL? ARE THERE ANY CLUES? ALDOUS HUXLEY'S ULTIMATE REVOLUTION THE NATURE OF POLICE STATES: FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC Michael Swift's Gay Manifto First published Febary 1987 and entered to the Congrsnal Rerd. So really was published. It was later claimed… * michael swift gay *
Or that the fay un will virtually cease to exist any tradnal sense should gay adoptn and same-sex marriage bee legal everywhere?
While they claim to want only equal protectn unr law, the real agenda of homosexual activists is simple: the plete alteratn of Amerin society to f the homosexual view of human sexualy, marriage and fay.
Pla Ettelbrick is former legal director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Edutn Fund and now executive director of the Internatnal Gay and Lbian Human Rights Commissn.
GAY HISTORY – READ: THE GAY REVOLUTNARY A.K.A. THE GAY MANIFTO BY MICHAEL SWIFT – 1987
They mt change the views of a culture that still remas somewhat anchored the Juo-Christian tradn, which nsirs homosexualy unnatural and sful. Christians who still hold to the Juo-Christian views of human sexualy, marriage and fay are lled by relig fahfulns to rist the homosexual movement.
In 1987 Steve Warren, a spokman for the ntroversial homosexual group ACT UP, wrote an article for The Advote, a magaze for the gay muny.
Tled “Warng to the Homophob, ” Warren spoke of “the mean-spired nature of Juo-Christian moraly. Even 1987, Warren felt that the homosexual movement uld not be stopped. “Fally, we will all likelihood want to expunge a number of passag om your Scriptur and rewre others, ” he said, “elimatg preferential treatment of marriage and g words that will allow for homosexual terpretatns of passag.
THE GAY COMMUNY NEWS PUBLISH A SATIRE BY MICHAEL SWIFT THAT HAS SADLY BEE REALY THIRTY YEARS LATER
Battle tacticsSo a homosexual utopia awas the activists, if only they n al wh those pky Christians. That qutn was answered as far back as 1985, when their article for Christopher Street, a gay magaze, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen ed a sensatn wh their blueprt to “persua straight Ameri” to accept homosexualy.
Their article was expand to a book on the subject, the natnal number one bt seller After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the ’90s. Kirk and Madsen foced the heart of their strategy on g the media as a propaganda tool persuadg the majory of Amerins that gay is OK. Gay activists, the thors said, should take a two-pronged approach to ntralizg the threat of a vigoro Christian-led opposn.
First, to “nfound” what Kirk and Madsen lled “the homophobia of te believers, ” they suggted that gays “muddy the moral waters. ” This would be acplished part by “publicizg support for gays by more morate church” and “raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of Biblil teachgs. Homosexual activists each of the major nomatns have so cloud the issu regardg the Biblil view of homosexualy as to threaten each wh schism and .