As support for gay marriage solidified, new rifts wh queer muni opened up.
Contents:
- “7 BIBLE QUOT SUPPORTG GAY RELATNSHIPS”
- TEN REASONS TO SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
- LATVIA BE 7TH NATN TO BE LED BY AN OPENLY GAY HEAD OF STATE
“7 BIBLE QUOT SUPPORTG GAY RELATNSHIPS”
“We are fightg for the gay muny, and we are fightg and fightg hard,” Donald Tmp told a Log Cab Republins gala. * images supporting gay marriage *
A small mory of Amerins (27%) supported legal regnn of gay and lbian marriag 1996, when Gallup first asked the qutn.
TEN REASONS TO SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE
As Edgars Rkēvičs be the first openly gay print Latvia’s history, here’s a glimpse at other openly gay heads of state om around the world. * images supporting gay marriage *
This uld suggt that support for gay marriage has reached a ceilg for this group, at least for now. Adults, who were once holdouts support for gay marriage, now e down on the same si of the issue as young adults. I hate to wre another blog post on any homosexual issu, but breaks my heart when I see thoands of people watchg and sharg ntent that furthers the misnceptn that God is alright wh homosexual relatnships.
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
Over nearly two s polics, Print Obama has staked out changg posns on gay rights. Here are the biggt ton. * images supporting gay marriage *
This week, a popular homosexual “vlogger” released a vio entled, “7 Bible Quot Supportg Gay Relatnships.
” Bee of the obsceni, I will not lk to the vio, but I will give you the ndown of all “7 Bible Quot Supportg Gay Relatnships, ” acrdg to Arielle Srcella and Matthew V. The term, “sexual immoraly” is a translatn of the Greek word, “porneia” which acrdg to the Strong’s fn clus “adultery, fornitn, homosexualy, lbianism, terurse wh animals, etc. Those of who teach that homosexualy is wrong are dog so bee we love people and we want them to be set ee om their bondage of s.
LATVIA BE 7TH NATN TO BE LED BY AN OPENLY GAY HEAD OF STATE
The premise is that Scripture only nmns homosexualy the ntext of a “vice of excs, like gluttony or dnkenns.
” And sce Srcella and V don’t believe homosexualy is nmned the ntext of a “lovg and mted relatnship, ” then they believe they n simply dismiss most ( not all) of God’s nmnatn of homosexualy. If people are born wh a sexual orientatn, then why wouldn’t there have been people the biblil tim who were exclively homosexual? Although Levic 18:22 shows God nsired homosexualy an abomatn unr the Old Law, Christians are not unr the Old Law today.
This is why I have no problem g Levic 18 to show that homosexualy was one of the abomatns of Sodom, but is not a passage I lean heavily upon to nvce people homosexualy is a s today. Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effemate, nor homosexuals, nor thiev, nor the veto, nor dnkards, nor revilers, nor swdlers, will her the kgdom of God. Matthew Ve says this verse should be ignored bee people didn’t even know what a te “homosexual” was Pl’s day.