The road to full marriage equaly for same-sex upl the Uned Stat was paved wh setbacks and victori. The landmark 2015 Supreme Court se Obergefell v. Hodg ma gay marriage legal throughout the untry.
Contents:
- GAY MARRIAGE
- OBAMA V DOMA: HOW GAY AMERINS MARCHED TOWARDS EQUALY
- HOW OBAMA BEME THE GAY-RIGHTS PRINT
GAY MARRIAGE
* lgbt doma *
Supreme Court is lled "Sectn Three, " which prevented the feral ernment om regnizg any marriag between gay or lbian upl for the purpose of feral laws or programs, even if those upl are nsired legally married by their home state. The other signifint part of DOMA mak so that dividual stat do not legally have to acknowledge the relatnships of gay and lbian upl who were married another state. Sectn Three is the part that prevented the feral ernment om regnizg any marriag between gay or lbian upl for the purpose of feral laws or programs, even if those upl are nsired legally married by their home is the stat of DOMA right now?
Anti-gay activists are nstantly implyg that children of straight parents are better off than children of gay or lbian parents. Those studi did NOT pare children of spo of straight upl to children of gay and lbian upl. All of the US's leadg mastream medil, tnal and psychologil associatns overwhelmgly agree that children of gay and lbian upl fare jt as well as children of straight example; The Amerin Amy of Pediatrics says: "[S]cientific lerature monstrat" that same-sex uple children "fare as well.
" The Amerin Psychologil Associatn says: "There is no scientific basis for ncludg that lbian mothers or gay fathers are unf parents on the basis of their sexual orientatn. " The Amerin Psychoanalytic Associatn says: "Gay and lbian dividuals and upl are pable of meetg the bt tert of the child.
OBAMA V DOMA: HOW GAY AMERINS MARCHED TOWARDS EQUALY
" The Child Welfare League of Ameri says: "Any attempt to preclu or prevent gay, lbian, and bisexual dividuals or upl om parentg, based solely on their sexual orientatn, is not the bt tert of children. A study published 2010 the journal Demography nclus that children beg raised by gay and lbian upl have almost exactly the same tnal achievement as children raised by married heterosexual upl. A report published the Amerin Soclogil Reviewback 2001 examed 21 studi which "almost uniformly (found) no notable differenc between children reared by heterosexual parents and those reared by lbian and gay parents…" And a study prented at the 1997 natnal meetg of the Society for Rearch on Child Development, rearch psychologist Charlotte Patterson said, "When you look at kids wh standard psychologil asssments, you n't tell who has a lbian parent and who has a heterosexual parent.
Early Years: Same-Sex Marriage Bans In 1970, jt one year after the historic Stonewall Rts that galvanized the gay rights movement, law stunt Richard Baker and librarian Jam McConnell applied for a marriage license Gerald Nelson rejected their applitn bee they were a same-sex uple, and a trial urt upheld his cisn.
” This lg effectively blocked feral urts om lg on same-sex marriage for s, leavg the cisn solely the hands of stat, which alt blow after blow to those hopg to see gay marriage beg 1973, for stance, Maryland beme the first state to create a law that explicly f marriage as a unn between a man and woman, a belief held by many nservative relig groups. Though the gay rights movement saw some advancements the 1970s and 1980s—such as Harvey Milk beg the first openly gay man elected to public office the untry 1977—the fight for gay marriage ma ltle headway for many years.
HOW OBAMA BEME THE GAY-RIGHTS PRINT
In 1989, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnerships, which granted hospal visatn rights and other years later, the District of Columbia siarly passed a new law that allowed same-sex upl to register as domtic partners. C., 1993, the hight urt Hawaii led that a ban on same-sex marriage may vlate that state nstutn’s Equal Protectn Clse—the first time a state urt has ever ched toward makg gay marriage Hawaii Supreme Court sent the se—brought by a gay male uple and two lbian upl who were nied marriage licens 1990—back for further review to the lower First Circu Court, which 1991 origally dismissed the the state tried to prove that there was “pellg state tert” jtifyg the ban, the se would be tied up ligatn for the next three Defense of Marriage Act Opponents of gay marriage, however, did not s on their hnch. Congrs 1996 passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which Print Bill Clton signed to didn’t ban gay marriage outright but specified that only heterosexual upl uld be granted feral marriage benefs.
That is, even if a state ma gay marriage legal, same-sex upl still wouldn’t be able to file e tax jotly, sponsor spo for immigratn benefs or receive spoal Social Secury payments, among many other act was a huge setback for the marriage equaly movement, but transient good news arose three months later: Hawaii Judge Kev S.