Contents:
- 'ACCEPT' AND 'TOLERATE' MY GAY KID? THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH
- JT BEE HE BREATH: LEARNG TO TLY LOVE OUR GAY SON
'ACCEPT' AND 'TOLERATE' MY GAY KID? THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH
Rob Portman (R-Oh) reversed his stance on gay marriage, largely bee his son is gay, and although I felt like I should have been happy about , left a bad taste my mouth.
Cizens, but my knee-jerk reactn was, "Oh, you support gay marriage now bee directly affects your fay? " I know that that thought was not genero, and I'm not proud of , but my tratn is real, and the problem of homophobia is U.
It turns out that he has a gay son too, but his opposn to marriage equaly is not gog to change. I've been fortunate enough to hear om gay kids all across the untry. I cherish the good stori, but there's often a moment those good stori that mak my heart hurt: when they tell me how happy they are that their parents "still" love them -- bee all those kids knew that not lovg them was an policians there is a lot talk of "acceptance" and "tolerance" when to homosexualy, and I n't help but thk that those are the wrong words.
JT BEE HE BREATH: LEARNG TO TLY LOVE OUR GAY SON
Beg gay. Anyone who thks that a child would make the choice to be gay is obte and not worth engagg a discsn of the people happen.
That means that gay children happen, and gay children n be born to anyone or adopted to any fay. If someone is not prepared to love a gay child, then what bs do they have parentg children at all?
After all, they n't perform the number-one may feel that is possible to love a person and not accept that he or she is gay. Lovg someone but hatg the fact that he or she is gay would be like lovg someone but hatg the fact that he or she has arms or what about those parents who do "accept" and "tolerate" their gay children? They're better parents than those who throw their children out of the hoe or abe them for beg gay.