Proponents ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, opponents ague that marriage is primarily for procreatn.
Contents:
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
In New York for stance, nearly 260 ln dollars was add to the enomy the year immediately followg the legalizatn of same sex marriage, also affects tourism by attractg gay upl om stat that do not allow same-sex marriage to stage the weddg this state (Anrson, 2017). For example, nearly all-homosexual upl did not have any accs or benefs to hospalizatn; if there was an emergency suatn, a person of the same sex was not allowed to vis their partner. Acrdg to Anrson, “A US study surveyed nearly 36, 000 people between 18-70 years old and found that bisexuals, gays, and lbians were ls psychologilly prsurized if they were regnized legally for same-sex marriage.
On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court led that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constutn all 50 stat.
US public opn had shifted signifintly over the years, om 27% approval of gay marriage 1996 to 55% 2015, the year beme legal throughout the Uned Stat, to 61% 2019. Proponents of legal gay marriage ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, and that same-sex upl should have accs to all the benefs enjoyed by different-sex upl. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Da County Circu Court Judge Sarah Zabel led Florida’s gay marriage ban unnstutnal and stated that the ban “serv only to hurt, to discrimate, to prive same-sex upl and their fai of equal digny, to label and treat them as send-class cizens, and to em them unworthy of participatn one of the fundamental stutns of our society.