@ki-wi I wouldn't say that's a sure sign. One of my iends has one earrg on his right si and he's fely not gay. Albe he ed to have a send earrg on his left ear but fell off, but you wouldn't know that unls you talk to him. So moral of the story: a sure sign if someone is gay is by gettg to know them|No, is not te. What a stupid ment! All typ of men wear whe socks wh jeans and shorts. All typ of men avoid wearg whe socks wh slacks/troers. It is better to wear dark socks wh troers. It has nothg to do wh beg gay. If anythg, gay men are LESS likely to wear whe socks wh troers, bee we know better.|^ No, that is not a sure sign of anythg. If that was ever te, you're right that was only supposedly te 30 years ago. Such nonsense!|@moncriefisme <3
Contents:
BEWARE: ALL OF THE THGS ARE GAY
If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to ." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn * is it gay to not wear socks *
If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to homie was upset about not gettg head last night so John said fuck I got socks on I’ll suck ! He took up the ass by 6 dus that shs gay!
Nah he had socks on so ’s okay bee of the sock the Sock le you have 'socks on' your feet any homosexual actns or statements beg ma holds a stat of beg unniably 'not gay'. This le appli to past, prent, and future events that socks are worn at the time someone challeng if dividual is mtg an act that is gay, the dividual qutn mt quickly claim whether or not they have 'socks on' or not. This is done to terme the orientatn(level of gay) of said event.