CRAIG REVEL HORWOOD is bt known as the straight-talkg Strictly Come Dancg judge. He is openly gay and engaged to his partner - but before he me out, he was actually married to a woman.
Contents:
- CRAIG REVEL HORWOOD REVEALS HE’S ‘NOT GAY’ AND ‘WANTS A RELATNSHIP WH A WOMAN’!
- STRICTLY HAS GONE ‘GAY’? WHAT DO PEOPLE THK THEY’VE BEEN WATCHG ALL THE YEARS?
- CRAIG REVEL HORWOOD ON HIS AMIBLE SPL WH PARTNER; ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE BIRTH OF HIS GAY NATURE!
CRAIG REVEL HORWOOD REVEALS HE’S ‘NOT GAY’ AND ‘WANTS A RELATNSHIP WH A WOMAN’!
"I was both gay and straight, but beg bisexual wasn't a big issue for me or her". Strictly Come Dancg star Craig Revel Horwood, 56, is one of the untry's most famo gay ins.
But before he me out as bisexual, and later as gay, Craig was actually married to a woman - until she bedd his iend, he says. "Jane had fact thought I was gay when we first met.
Craig went on to expla how his sexualy veloped another terview, as he realised he was gay not long after the divorce. I have been gay ever sce.
STRICTLY HAS GONE ‘GAY’? WHAT DO PEOPLE THK THEY’VE BEEN WATCHG ALL THE YEARS?
He is openly gay and engaged to his partner - but before he me out, he was actually married to a woman. Oti Mabe: Craig Revel Horwood reacts to Strictly exStrictly Come Dancg judge Craig Revel Horwood is a gay in - but before he me out, he was married to a woman, who is now a good iend of his. He was 25 and she was 30, and she had thought he was gay when they first met, but he intified as bisexual.
After their divorce, Craig says he realised he was gay. He even nfsed that he don’t even nsir himself gay. ” The openly gay Strictly judge was prevly married to his ex-wife Jane Horwood om 1990-1992.
CRAIG REVEL HORWOOD ON HIS AMIBLE SPL WH PARTNER; ALSO TALKS ABOUT THE BIRTH OF HIS GAY NATURE!
Craig wrote his tobgraphy: “Jane had fact thought I was gay when we first met. ” "I was both gay and straight, so beg bisexual, wasn’t a big issue for me or for her.
Homophobia is a ser and ntug problem, but was difficult this week not to enjoy aspects of the hoo-ha over Strictly Come Dancg. In what felt like a historil re-enactment of classic 1970s’ curta-twchg, 189 viewers plaed to the BBC about two men partnerg each other on primetime telly, and was hard to know what to lgh at first: the Mary Whehoe tone of the plats, the statement on Instagram by one of the dancers – realisg the full dramatic potential of the moment – that “love knows no boundari”, or the ia that the spectacle of two men dancg uld ever be the gayt thg about Strictly.
Nohels, there was somethg vaguely fortg about the fact that, particularly the ntext of the recent LGBT teachg row, mastream culture at least, plats of this kd about gay reprentatn seem outdated to the pot of schools, of urse, the battle rag on. I looked up the wordg of Sectn 28 and was amazed to fd that, until was overturned 2003, not only did ban lol thori om “promotg” homosexualy, but that, like somethg drafted by the Wtboro Baptist Church, banned “the teachg any mataed school of the acceptabily of homosexualy as a pretend fay relatnship”. Bt to refer them to Alan Partridge: “For cryg out loud, if I really uldn’t bear to nsort wh homosexuals, do you really thk I’d have pursued a reer televisn?