In a classic monstratn of appropriate generalizatns om a biased sample, the Cameron group ed obuari om gay muny newspapers to timate the average life span of homosexuals.
Contents:
YET ANOTHER STUDY CONFIRMS GAY LIFE EXPECTANCY 20 YEARS SHORTER
I personally examed thoands of obuari of gay men to support the claim that homosexualy is not a healthy liftyle. * life span of my gay friend *
Dpe the scientific evince to the ntrary, pro-homosexual groups tend to sist that livg the active homosexual “liftyle” is jt as healthy as heterosexualy.
Some of the claims ma by pro-homosexual groups are ridiculo on their face. THE ARGUMENT: Anti-gay anizatns want to promote heterosexualy as the healthier “choice.
” Furthermore, the purportedly shorter life spans and poorer physil and mental health of gays and lbians are often offered as reasons why they shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or foster children. Anyone who has done rearch this area of public health knows that active homosexual behavr is not a healthy liftyle, brgg tremendo leter physil and mental nsequenc.
Unrstand health ncerns for gay men and other men who have sex wh men, and learn how to promote good health. * life span of my gay friend *
Unfortunately, the rearch showg the effects is nmned or ignored by homophil. To plement this rearch I took a different approach: I examed 6, 089 obuari of homosexual men om four homosexual magaz: The Bay Area Reporter, the Washgton Bla, the New York Bla and This Week, published between 1980 to 2014 clive. In orr to be clud as a subject of this survey, a man had to be posively intified as a homosexual, which meant that only a actn of available obuari were ed this survey.