Gay Agenda | Hawaii Weddg Servic | Staable & Kanaka

Contents:

• THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
• THE GAY AGENDA COLLECTIVE
• NETFLIX LNCH ‘THE GAY AGENDA,’ PODST CELEBRATG LGBTQ+ COMMUNY (EXCLUSIVE)
• ‘GIRLS GAYS THEYS’ SHIRTS AREN’T OBSCENE: DON’T LET NSERVATIV REWRE HISTORY
• THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED
• THE GAY AGENDA AND THE REAL WORLD

THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI

WE EXECUTE4ENJOY A STRESS FREE DAYOur team will help you be rmed as you select which llectn will fulfill your needs & FOUNDERZABRINAThe Gay Agenda Collective, LLC (also known as TGA) is a Kanaka, queer-owned and operated weddg planng bs Hawaiʻi. In the November 1987 edn of Gui, a magaze for homosexuals, the two men thored an article tled “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri.

” There Kirk, a rearcher nropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relatns nsultant, laid out a blueprt to fundamentally change Amerins’ attus toward homosexuals and homosexualy. In 1989 they expand that blueprt to a 398-page book tled After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the 90s.

THE GAY AGENDA COLLECTIVE

Their goal was to make homosexualy acceptable and to fe negative opns of any who disagree.

NETFLIX LNCH ‘THE GAY AGENDA,’ PODST CELEBRATG LGBTQ+ COMMUNY (EXCLUSIVE)

The article began by statg: “The first orr of bs is sensizatn of the Amerin public ncerng gays and gay rights. One person scribed “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri” as the “bible” of the homosexual agenda. We do not need and nnot expect a full ‘appreciatn’ or ‘unrstandg’ of homosexualy om the average Amerin.

‘GIRLS GAYS THEYS’ SHIRTS AREN’T OBSCENE: DON’T LET NSERVATIV REWRE HISTORY

Gallup polls 1989 showed that only 19 percent of Amerins believed people were born homosexual, wh 48 percent believg was due to environmental factors such as upbrgg.

By 2015 those numbers had dramatilly shifted to 51 percent believg homosexuals were born that way and only 30 percent attributg to other factors. (This is spe of the fact that extensive geic rearch and many studi of intil tws where only one was homosexual have disproven geic termism.

THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED

Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers. The way to benumb raw sensivi about homosexualy is to have a lot of people talk a great al about the subject a ntral or supportive way... Constant talk builds the imprsn that public opn is at least divid on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practic homosexualy.

In the early stag of any mpaign to reach straight Ameri, the mass should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavr self.

“So far, gay Hollywood has provid our bt vert weapon the battle to sensize the mastream. B by b over the past ten years, gay characters and gay them have been troduced to TV programs and films...

THE GAY AGENDA AND THE REAL WORLD

Have you noticed the number of homosexual characters appearg TV programs and how they are overwhelmgly picted posively?

A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct. If a child grows up hearg about the gay liftyle and seeg portrayed posively his entire life, won’t that make seem normal? Kirk and Madsen also scribed a strategy by which the homosexual movement uld unter and largely nullify opposn om Ameri’s church.

They wrote: “When nservative church nmn gays, there are only two thgs we n do to nfound the homophobia of te believers.

This means publicizg support for gays by more morate church, raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of biblil teachgs, and exposg hatred and nsistency.

This they have certaly acplished—enlistg liberal scholars to expla away biblil teachgs about homosexual practic, reterpretg their pla meang. They ntued: “Send, we n unrme the moral thory of homophobic church by portrayg them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step wh the tim and wh the latt fdgs of psychology. Those who hold to biblil teachgs about homosexualy and marriage are nmned as bigots, homophob and backward thkers who are a threat to progrs.

Some who have stood up have been fed, orred to attend pro-homosexual “sensivy trag, ” lost jobs or had their bs sued out of existence by ernment agents and agenci that support the homosexual agenda. “In any mpaign to w over the public, gays mt be st as victims need of protectn, ” Kirk and Madsen wrote.

Of urse this do not addrs the issue of whether the gay liftyle is right or wrong. “If gays are prented, stead, as a strong and priful tribe promotg a rigidly nonnformist and viant liftyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that jtifi ristance and opprsn. For that reason, we mt forego the temptatn to stt our ‘gay pri’ publicly when nflicts wh the Gay Victim image, ” they wrote.

This means that jnty mtached mclemen would keep very low profile gay mercials and other public prentatns, while sympathetic figur of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured.

They then add this utn for those who would want to ph the gay agenda too far: “It almost go whout sayg that groups on the fartht marg of acceptabily such as NAMBLA [the North Amerin Man-Boy Love Associatn, which as s name suggts promot adult-child homosexual sex] mt play no part at all such a mpaign: spected child-molters will never look like victims...