GAY STUDIES AND THE VICTORIAN PERIOD on JSTOR

Contents:

• SEX SYMBOL: HOW ANTO BEME A GAY CO WORD THE VICTORIAN ERA
• BEFORE STRAIGHT AND GAY
• GAY CONVERSN THERAPY’S DISTURBG 19TH-CENTURY ORIGS

SEX SYMBOL: HOW ANTO BEME A GAY CO WORD THE VICTORIAN ERA

The Victorian era is important to be looked at so that we know the cultural ntext which Osr Wil ed to live homosexualy went agast the notn of masculy, was talked about rarely and threatened the fay stcture as well as was believed to go agast beg fundamentally Brish. Discsns about homosexualy among society was very mimal bee Victorian cizens tried to ignore the fact ncept that mal might have sexual relatnship wh other mal.

BEFORE STRAIGHT AND GAY

Many believed that one uld be moral and at the same time have sexual was one of the reasons why homosexualy was extremely problematic issue the Brish society faced at that time.

In the fundamental Brish society, was embarrassg to speak of this sexual was only when the trials of Osr Wil were gog on that the term and ia of classifyg homosexualy me to limelight. Observable homosexualyEven though heterosexualy was nsired normal and natural throughout Victorian era, there is seen visible crease homosexualy pecially among men as well as telligentsia durg that perd of history.

The reason was that homosexualy was prohibed as cent behavur public and privately, gay sex behd closed doors was not nsired crimal offence until 1885. ” Jt as homosexualy mataed an ambiguo (and even paradoxil) posn wh Victorian culture—beg simultaneoly central and limal—so, too, is s place wh Victorian lerature and s specifilly Victorian textual endgs.

GAY CONVERSN THERAPY’S DISTURBG 19TH-CENTURY ORIGS

Furthermore, creasgly dissemated and sometim sympathetic discsns of homosexualy wh legal, medil, and scientific circl ntributed to nascent dividual and llective self-fn and provid a language wh which to argue agast reprsive legislatn and mor. While earlier cril work celebrated closeted thors and intified and recuperated homosexual subjects and acts hidn wh texts, more recent scholarly work emphasiz the historil ntgency of “homosexualy” as a stable inty tegory and stead emphasiz a more labile queerns that rists normativy. This June the Molly Brown Hoe Mm has created a Thirsty Thursday event to ci wh Lbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgenr (LGBT) Pri Month tled Queer the Age of the Queen.

In 1890 philosopher and psychologist William Jam went so far as to theorize that while the male repulsn of homosexualy is stctive, cultur which homosexualy is regularly practiced and his view tolerated, mt have only been achieved by overg the “natural” aversn through force of hab. In a 1908 cross-cultural study, philosopher and soclogist Edward Wtermarck me to siar ncln, but extend his theori to addrs the rejectn of homosexualy by relig stutns.

Wtermarck lked homophobic attus wh Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian religns to the historil associatn of homosexual practic wh idolatry and hery. Durg this perd self proclaimed sexologists Richard von Kraft-Ebg and Havelock Ellis are said to have pneered the would-be scientific study of sexualy and created tegori for homosexualy and heterosexualy. Historian Jonathan Ned Katz has poted out that heterosexualy too was vented as an inty ncept durg this time by proxy of the creatn of a signatn for homosexualy.