Honeymoon travel dreams of Kerala's send gay uple | Travel | Kerala | Gay uple | Manorama English

Contents:

• KERALA'S 1ST GAY COUPLE WHO GOT MARRIED IN A TEMPLE MOVE HIGH COURT TO GET MARRIAGE REGISTERED
• AFTER PRE-WEDDG SHOOT GO VIRAL, KERALA GAY UPLE SAY THEY WANTED TO SHOW WAS NORMAL
• THE FIRST ‘MARRIED’ GAY UPLE MOV KERALA HIGH COURT FOR REGNN OF HOMO-SEXUAL MARRIAG.
• HONEYMOON TRAVEL DREAMS OF KERALA'S SEND GAY UPLE
• TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
• KERALA GAY COUPLE MOV COURT TO LEGALISE THEIR MARRIAGE
• KERALA GAY UPLE MOV HC SEEKG NOD FOR SAME SEX MARRIAGE
• NOTICE TO CENTER, ON GAY COUPL’ PLEA FOR MARRIAGE REGISTRATN – KERALA HC
• MEET SONU AND NIKH, THE FIRST ‘MARRIED’ GAY COUPLE OM KERALA
• TWO GAY INDIAN AMERIN MEN OF MALAYALEE ORIG GET MARRIED CALIFORNIA
• PICS: GAY COUPLE, RNED BY KERALA HIGH COURT IN MAY, NOW EXCHANGE RGS

KERALA'S 1ST GAY COUPLE WHO GOT MARRIED IN A TEMPLE MOVE HIGH COURT TO GET MARRIAGE REGISTERED

Nikh and Sonu, the first married gay uple om Kerala who got married 2019 have now filed a petn the Kerala High Court seekg to legally register their marriage. In their petn, they argued that the refal to register homosexual marriag unr the Special Marriage Act 1954 vlat the prcipl of equaly, non-arbrars, non-discrimatn, dividual digny and personal tonomy unr Articl 14, 15(1), 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constutn of India. “The stutn of marriage affords certa rights and privileg to the persons matrimony the society and due to the aforaid excln, the homosexual upl like the petners are nied an opportuny to enjoy siar rights and privileg.

Though the Supreme Court had 2018 scrapped Sectn 377 and crimalized homosexualy the verdict stopped short of makg gay marriag legal.

Nived and Rahim would probably be the first gay uple om the State to get married after the Constutn Bench of the Supreme Court. ” In s epoch-makg judgement, a five-member Bench of the apex urt crimalised nsensual sex between adults of same urt held that the sectn would not apply to nsensual same-sex acts between homosexuals, lbians, and other sexual mori.

AFTER PRE-WEDDG SHOOT GO VIRAL, KERALA GAY UPLE SAY THEY WANTED TO SHOW WAS NORMAL

Every day, we get phone lls om gay people who are facg unimagable societal and faial prsure to get married to a woman, ” he lbian marriagNo lbian marriag have taken place Kerala so far.

THE FIRST ‘MARRIED’ GAY UPLE MOV KERALA HIGH COURT FOR REGNN OF HOMO-SEXUAL MARRIAG.

"India's Supreme Court crimalised gay sex 2018 after a s-long legal battle by activists and LGBTQ+ groups. In the meantime, many gay upl have been participatg mment Noora and Ms Nasar have sanctn om the Kerala high urt to be together, but they do not have the privileg or rights that a married uple would enjoy India.

However, I kept this feelg to myself, bee of the taboo nature of the matter,” wrote Nikh Usha Phkaran on his viral social media post while gog on to expla how normal is to be a homosexual, and reveal that Sonu M S and he have been livg as a “married uple” for a year.Through the post, the entreprenr revealed that the duo, whom many had “thought were two iends livg the same apartment” began stayg together sce July 15, 2018, after gettg “married at Guvayoor Temple”.

HONEYMOON TRAVEL DREAMS OF KERALA'S SEND GAY UPLE

“There are many gay upl Kerala who are leadg secret liv and I thk is meangls.

However, is important to legalise gay marriage as right now we are jt livg as partners ont of the society. “We did to show that gay uple shoots n be as betiful and romantic as any other uple shoot and there’s nothg crgy or vulgar about , ” Nived strsed, highlightg how some prev photoshoots om the muny had e for flak. Wh a msage to show that gay weddgs too are normal the pair didn’t want to miss out on anythg other upl do weddgs.

When they do exchange vows later this month, they will be Kerala’s send openly married gay uple. The first married ‘gay’ uple has moved to the High Court of Kerala to challenge the provisns of Special Marriage Act of 1954 as they don’t ver and regnise the registratn of a homosexual marriage. The petner has add that the non-regnn of homosexual marriag Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the discrimatory provisns of the Act are agast Articl 14, 15(1), 19(1) (a) and 21 of the Constutn of India.

TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT

The act of homosexualy was crimalized after the Judgment pronounced  Navtej Sgh Johar v. In dog, perpetuat a symbtic relatnship between anti-homosexual legislatn and tradnal genr rol.

The notn of the nature of relatnships is fixed and is wh the ‘orr of nature’ perpetuated by genr rol, th excludg homosexualy om the narrative.

KERALA GAY COUPLE MOV COURT TO LEGALISE THEIR MARRIAGE

Siarly, the provisns of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 mt give equal accs to the stutn of marriage for homosexual upl.

They referred to a judgment ma by the Supreme Court of the Uned Stat of Ameri clarg Homosexual Marriage is Constutnally Valid unr the le of. Special Marriage Act, 1954 don’t regnize Homosexual Marriag.

KERALA GAY UPLE MOV HC SEEKG NOD FOR SAME SEX MARRIAGE

, Gay Couple Mov Kerala HC For Regnn Of Homosexual Marriag Unr Special Marriage ActTim of India, Gay uple mov Kerala high urt to register marriage. The New Indian Exprs, Kerala’s first gay uple mov High Court to legalise their marriage.

NOTICE TO CENTER, ON GAY COUPL’ PLEA FOR MARRIAGE REGISTRATN – KERALA HC

Kerala's send gay uple Nived and Rahim celebrated their weddg a grand style recently. The anisers knew that Nived and Karim were a gay uple and surprised them by arrangg a honeymoon package.

The Supreme Court crimalisg homosexualy 2018 marked both a hard-earned eedom, and the start of the stggle for rights that are basic for heterosexual upl. A gay uple om Kerala, married as far as the ceremony is ncerned, has filed a petn the Kerala HC as their marriage is not regnised by any of the marriage laws, cludg the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Read agast the SC judgment crimalisg homosexualy that held that sexualy was an important part of personal digny, which, turn, was a part of right to life, the Act fails to acunt for a person’s sexual and genr inti. Members and alli of the lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr (LGBT) muny take part Delhi's 12th Queer Pri March om Barakhamba Road to Jantar Mantar New Delhi. After the Supreme Court read down Sectn 377 of the Indian Penal Co September 2018, same-sex relatnships are legal but civil rights such as marriage, herance or adoptn, are not guaranteed to the Lbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgenr (LGBT) muny.

MEET SONU AND NIKH, THE FIRST ‘MARRIED’ GAY COUPLE OM KERALA

“By our petn, we hope no gay uple ever has to go through this. In s landmark Navtej Johar judgment 2018, the top urt crimalised homosexualy but didn’t get to civil rights issu. The petner, a native of Ernakulam, also ced the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment om 2018 that crimalised homosexualy the untry.

The bench clared the 156-year-old “tyranny” of Sectn 377, which punished homosexualy wh 10-year imprisonment, as “irratnal, fensible and maniftly arbrary”. After her partner was forcibly separated last week, the woman took up wh Vanaja Collective — a Kozhiko-based NGO workg for the rights of LGBTIQ (lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, ter-sex and queer) — and approached the police Thamarassery (Kozhiko district).

Acrdg to the Texas judicial missn’s 2019 warng, Hensley referred gay upl who wanted her to pri over their marriage ceremony to other people who would officiate. The Kerala High Court has sought the views of Central and state ernments on the A gay uple has moved the Kerala High Court, seekg to strike down certa provisns unr the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which do not perm to get their marriage registered. However, the relig thori cled to solemnise the weddg and hence the uple cid to get their marriage registered unr the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which do not regnise homosexual their plea, the gay uple stated that was aggrieved by the provisns of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 whereby the law provid there only perms a heterosexual (oppose sex) uple to get married and a homosexual uple like them is nied equal accs to the stutn of claim that the impugned provisns of the Act vlate their fundamental rights and are th "illegal and unnstutnal" to that extent.

TWO GAY INDIAN AMERIN MEN OF MALAYALEE ORIG GET MARRIED CALIFORNIA

Seekg claratns this nnectn and to obta the relief for gettg married unr the Act, the wr petn was beg moved jotly by the petners, who submted that they have suffered public huiatn after they disclosed their love for each, greater is the sult and digny the petners have suffered at the hands of law, which ref to regnise their unn, g immense pa and agony to them, they said the that the impugned provisns rtrict the procs of applitn, solemnisatn and registratn of marriag to heterosexual upl alone and exclu homosexual upl om s amb, thepetners said mt be held "unnstutnal" and th be stck or read down to that extent of illegaly.

NIKESH and Sonu, a married gay uple om Thrissur, have moved the Kerala High Court challengg the provisns of Special Marriage Act, 1954 [Act of 1954] to get the permissn to register their marriage. The plea has stirred the bate around marriage equaly for homosexual upl India. They say “though the text of the Act do not exclu homosexual unns om s amb exprsly, Sectn 4 and Schl 2-4 to the Act rry a heterosexual unrtone s language as shows marriage as an affair between a male and a female or between bri and brigroom”.

Unn of India (2018) where the urt while crimalizg the Sectn 377 of the Indian Penal Co which prohibed homosexual acts held that members of the homosexual muny were entled to the full protectn of all the civil liberti available to others. At prent, 30 untri and terrori have enacted natnal legislatn allowg homosexual people to marry. Laws India are yet to regnise the same set of rights and rponsibili for married homosexual upl that they do for heterosexual married upl.

PICS: GAY COUPLE, RNED BY KERALA HIGH COURT IN MAY, NOW EXCHANGE RGS

Homosexual upl India do not have any legal rights such as registratn of marriage, herance, succsn, and adoptn, matenance of the spoe and children, and guardianship among others. After the crimalisatn of homosexualy by the apex urt, the homosexual muny members are g out for equal rights and stat. There is, therefore, no reason for not extendg this right to marry to the homosexual upl – apart om bld prejudice and lack of unrstandg of the homosexual muny.