Fah Gay Archiv - Above the Law

Contents:

• FAH GAY
• FAH GAY HAS A TOTALLY ZEN PERSPECTIVE ON THE JOHN QUN EMAIL
• JOHN QUN IS NOT HAPPY ABOUT SELENDY & GAY -- AND HE SENT THE ANGRY REPLY ALL TO PROVE IT

FAH GAY

Fah Gay Has A Totally Zen Perspective On The John Qun Email.

John Qun's email didn't pull any punch, but Fah Gay is lookg to the future. When Philippe Selendy and Fah Gay announced that they’d be leavg Qun Emanuel to start Selendy & Gay, ’s safe to say that John Qun didn’t take well.

And when Gay sent her parture memo to the firm, Qun replied to all wh a sthg rebe. Dpe beg on the receivg of Qun’s lashg out, Fah Gay seems to unrstand where Qun was g om. In an terview wh Jenna Greene Ligatn Daily, Gay addrs the email:.

FAH GAY HAS A TOTALLY ZEN PERSPECTIVE ON THE JOHN QUN EMAIL

In other words, she unrstands why this move would provoke strong feelgs, but everyone’s movg on and there’s a big enough pie for Selendy & Gay and Qun Emanuel to both eat their fill. In Depth wh Selendy and Gay on Their New Firm—and Leavg Qun Emanuel [Ligatn Daily].

Earlier: John Qun Still Isn’t Happy, But Now He’s Showg A Softer SiJohn Qun Is NOT Happy About Selendy & Gay — And He Sent The Angry Reply All To Prove ItBig-Name Departur From Qun Emanuel. So when John Qun replied to Fah Gay’s parture memo wh some blunt honty, was a breath of h air. Fah Gay, until now the Co-Chair of Qun Emanuel’s Natnal Trial Practice group who is leavg Qun to start Selendy & Gay wh fellow Qun alum and Ligator of the Year Philippe Selendy, sent her parture memo at 8:50 p.

JOHN QUN IS NOT HAPPY ABOUT SELENDY & GAY -- AND HE SENT THE ANGRY REPLY ALL TO PROVE IT

Oh, and the documents say that Fah Gay, then of Qun Emanuel and now of Selendy & Gay, was also publicly reprentg Prevezon while ordatg wh BakerHostetler behd the scen. John Qun is gog to war wh Selendy & Gay. Maybe we should have expected — after all, the name partner did break wh all ctoms and norms when he put Fah Gay on blast wh an all-firm email when she announced she was leavg the firm.

Now word that Qun Emanuel has iated arbratn proceedgs agast Selendy & Gay seekg to enforce a “forfeure-for-petn” provisn the partnership agreement, said to entle Qun to 10 percent of any legal fe om clients the ex-Qun attorneys brought to the new firm for a perd of 18 months. That’s bee Selendy & Gay isn’t takg lyg down.

The petn also not that, to the bt knowledge of any of the Selendy & Gay attorneys, this is the first time the firm has sought to enforce that provisn of the partnership agreement. “New York’s ethil l strictly forbid any agreement that rtricts the right of a lawyer to practice after termatn of the relatnship created by that agreement, ” the Selendy & Gay lawyers wrote the petn. As reported by, Qun Emanuel’s cisn to go after Selendy & Gay me after the firm allegedly sought assuranc the new firm wouldn’t be takg senr associat wh them.