Gay Marriage: Theologil and Moral Arguments - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

Contents:

• TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
• GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS

TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT

Acrdg to the Texas judicial missn’s 2019 warng, Hensley referred gay upl who wanted her to pri over their marriage ceremony to other people who would officiate. Dpe the scientific evince to the ntrary, pro-homosexual groups tend to sist that livg the active homosexual “liftyle” is jt as healthy as heterosexualy. Some of the claims ma by pro-homosexual groups are ridiculo on their face.

THE ARGUMENT: Anti-gay anizatns want to promote heterosexualy as the healthier “choice. ” Furthermore, the purportedly shorter life spans and poorer physil and mental health of gays and lbians are often offered as reasons why they shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or foster children. Anyone who has done rearch this area of public health knows that active homosexual behavr is not a healthy liftyle, brgg tremendo leter physil and mental nsequenc.

GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS

Unfortunately, the rearch showg the effects is nmned or ignored by homophil. To plement this rearch I took a different approach: I examed 6, 089 obuari of homosexual men om four homosexual magaz: The Bay Area Reporter, the Washgton Bla, the New York Bla and This Week, published between 1980 to 2014 clive. In orr to be clud as a subject of this survey, a man had to be posively intified as a homosexual, which meant that only a actn of available obuari were ed this survey.

As time pass and medil novatns proliferate, life spans are lengtheng, cludg those of male homosexuals.