The Gay Agenda argu that the current gay rights agenda has been overly termed by the culture war and lls for a liberate step outsi of culture war di
Contents:
- THE GAY AGENDA
- THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
- THE GAY AGENDA : CLAIMG SPACE, INTY, AND JTICE
- THE GAY AGENDA
- THE GAY AGENDA : A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK
THE GAY AGENDA
The startlg shift Amerin attus toward gays and same-sex marriage is not the rult of chance or random events. More than a quarter century ago, gay strategists laid out a plan to transform the natn—wh astoundg succs. * the gay agenda pdf *
In the November 1987 edn of Gui, a magaze for homosexuals, the two men thored an article tled “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri. ” There Kirk, a rearcher nropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relatns nsultant, laid out a blueprt to fundamentally change Amerins’ attus toward homosexuals and homosexualy. In 1989 they expand that blueprt to a 398-page book tled After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the 90s.
Their goal was to make homosexualy acceptable and to fe negative opns of any who disagree. The article began by statg: “The first orr of bs is sensizatn of the Amerin public ncerng gays and gay rights. To sensize the public is to help view homosexualy wh difference...
One person scribed “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri” as the “bible” of the homosexual agenda. We do not need and nnot expect a full ‘appreciatn’ or ‘unrstandg’ of homosexualy om the average Amerin. You n fet about tryg to persua the mass that homosexualy is a good thg.
THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
* the gay agenda pdf *
Gallup polls 1989 showed that only 19 percent of Amerins believed people were born homosexual, wh 48 percent believg was due to environmental factors such as upbrgg.
THE GAY AGENDA : CLAIMG SPACE, INTY, AND JTICE
By 2015 those numbers had dramatilly shifted to 51 percent believg homosexuals were born that way and only 30 percent attributg to other factors. (This is spe of the fact that extensive geic rearch and many studi of intil tws where only one was homosexual have disproven geic termism.
Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers. Step 1: “Talk about gays and gayns as loudly and as often as possible.
The way to benumb raw sensivi about homosexualy is to have a lot of people talk a great al about the subject a ntral or supportive way... Constant talk builds the imprsn that public opn is at least divid on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practic homosexualy.
THE GAY AGENDA
Consir this quote: “And when we say talk about homosexualy, we mean jt that. In the early stag of any mpaign to reach straight Ameri, the mass should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavr self.
“So far, gay Hollywood has provid our bt vert weapon the battle to sensize the mastream. B by b over the past ten years, gay characters and gay them have been troduced to TV programs and films...
Have you noticed the number of homosexual characters appearg TV programs and how they are overwhelmgly picted posively? A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct. If a child grows up hearg about the gay liftyle and seeg portrayed posively his entire life, won’t that make seem normal?
THE GAY AGENDA : A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK
Kirk and Madsen also scribed a strategy by which the homosexual movement uld unter and largely nullify opposn om Ameri’s church. They wrote: “When nservative church nmn gays, there are only two thgs we n do to nfound the homophobia of te believers. This means publicizg support for gays by more morate church, raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of biblil teachgs, and exposg hatred and nsistency.