The San Francis Gay Men’s Chos releas ntroversial song about how their “gay agenda” will “rpt” children to be “alli.”
Contents:
- ‘WE’RE COMG FOR YOUR CHILDREN’: SAN FRANCIS GAY MEN’S CHOIR SGS IN VIRAL VIO
- THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
- THE GAY AGENDA!
- GAY MEN’S CHOS LERALLY SGS “THE GAY AGENDA IS HERE” AND “WE’RE G FOR YOUR CHILDREN”
- FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+
- SAN FRANCIS GAY MEN’S CHOS FAC BACKLASH AFTER RELEASG ‘WE’RE G FOR YOUR CHILDREN’ VIO
- THE ANTI-GAY AGENDA
- THE GAY AGENDA
‘WE’RE COMG FOR YOUR CHILDREN’: SAN FRANCIS GAY MEN’S CHOIR SGS IN VIRAL VIO
The startlg shift Amerin attus toward gays and same-sex marriage is not the rult of chance or random events. More than a quarter century ago, gay strategists laid out a plan to transform the natn—wh astoundg succs. * the gay agenda song *
As ially reported by Not the Bee, the San Francis Gay Men’s Chos, first tablished 1975, has released a new origal song which they clare they are “g for your children.
THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
* the gay agenda song *
”The vers the song directly mock the fears of parents who attempt to keep their children away om media that ph an LGBTQ agenda, claimg that fai will not be able to protect their ltle on om gay propaganda:You say we all lead liv you don’t rpect. – reachg one and all, there’s really no pg , e even grandma lik RuPl…The world’s gettg kr, Gen Z’s gayer than Grdr…We’re g for them.
We’re g for your children…The gay agenda is g home. The gay agenda is the vio has been receivg wi notice on social media, don’t appear to be havg the impact the choir members hoped for. ”While the choir’s posn appears somewhat tongue--cheek, new analysis The Daily Wire vered earlier this week reveals that LGBTQ activists have been workg behd the scen popular children’s programmg to clu more gay and transgenr ntent.
THE GAY AGENDA!
The San Francis Gay Men’s Chos has faced tense backlash after releasg a song that many believe is tent on phg the LGBT agenda on children. * the gay agenda song *
Emphasizg new gay characters shows like “Doc McStuffs, ” the story not, “The rise of genr-diverse reprentatn isn’t a cince. In the November 1987 edn of Gui, a magaze for homosexuals, the two men thored an article tled “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri. ” There Kirk, a rearcher nropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relatns nsultant, laid out a blueprt to fundamentally change Amerins’ attus toward homosexuals and homosexualy.
In 1989 they expand that blueprt to a 398-page book tled After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the 90s.
The “bible” of the homosexual agenda. Their goal was to make homosexualy acceptable and to fe negative opns of any who disagree. The article began by statg: “The first orr of bs is sensizatn of the Amerin public ncerng gays and gay rights.
GAY MEN’S CHOS LERALLY SGS “THE GAY AGENDA IS HERE” AND “WE’RE G FOR YOUR CHILDREN”
It is not the gay Black person who be an stment of a whe supremacist attack on Black masculy. It is the Black homophobe. * the gay agenda song *
To sensize the public is to help view homosexualy wh difference...
One person scribed “The Overhlg of Straight Ameri” as the “bible” of the homosexual agenda. We do not need and nnot expect a full ‘appreciatn’ or ‘unrstandg’ of homosexualy om the average Amerin.
You n fet about tryg to persua the mass that homosexualy is a good thg. Gallup polls 1989 showed that only 19 percent of Amerins believed people were born homosexual, wh 48 percent believg was due to environmental factors such as upbrgg. By 2015 those numbers had dramatilly shifted to 51 percent believg homosexuals were born that way and only 30 percent attributg to other factors.
FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+
(This is spe of the fact that extensive geic rearch and many studi of intil tws where only one was homosexual have disproven geic termism. Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers.
Step 1: “Talk about gays and gayns as loudly and as often as possible. The way to benumb raw sensivi about homosexualy is to have a lot of people talk a great al about the subject a ntral or supportive way...
SAN FRANCIS GAY MEN’S CHOS FAC BACKLASH AFTER RELEASG ‘WE’RE G FOR YOUR CHILDREN’ VIO
Constant talk builds the imprsn that public opn is at least divid on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practic homosexualy. Consir this quote: “And when we say talk about homosexualy, we mean jt that.
In the early stag of any mpaign to reach straight Ameri, the mass should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavr self.
“So far, gay Hollywood has provid our bt vert weapon the battle to sensize the mastream.
THE ANTI-GAY AGENDA
B by b over the past ten years, gay characters and gay them have been troduced to TV programs and films... Have you noticed the number of homosexual characters appearg TV programs and how they are overwhelmgly picted posively?
A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct. If a child grows up hearg about the gay liftyle and seeg portrayed posively his entire life, won’t that make seem normal? Kirk and Madsen also scribed a strategy by which the homosexual movement uld unter and largely nullify opposn om Ameri’s church.
THE GAY AGENDA
They wrote: “When nservative church nmn gays, there are only two thgs we n do to nfound the homophobia of te believers. This means publicizg support for gays by more morate church, raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of biblil teachgs, and exposg hatred and nsistency. This they have certaly acplished—enlistg liberal scholars to expla away biblil teachgs about homosexual practic, reterpretg their pla meang.