Globally, LGBT+ people ntue to stggle to achieve full realizatn of their human rights. Amid reported health and mental health dispari, and enomic secury, we nducted a spg review to explore the breadth of the lerature, map and summarize the evince, and intify knowledge gaps on LGBT+ cln and human rights Thailand. We nducted a spg review acrdance wh the methodology veloped by the Joanna Briggs Instute and PRISMA-ScR guil. We systematilly searched 16 databas for peer-reviewed lerature, and ernment and nonernmental anizatn webs for grey lerature, published English or Thai om January 1, 2000–Augt 21, 2020. Two reviewers penntly screened studi acrdg to pre-set creria. We abstracted and analyzed data on publitn characteristics and fol populatns, and synthized fdgs six domas of LGBT+ cln: polil and civic participatn, tn, fay, personal secury and vlence, enomic well-beg, and health. The review ptured 3327 rults total, which was sped to 76 peer-reviewed articl and 39 grey lerature sourc, the majory published after 2010. Gay men and transgenr women were the primary fol populatns the peer-reviewed lerature, LGBT+ people as a whole the grey lerature. Health was the predomant doma across publitns. Key fdgs clu the absence of generalized antidiscrimatn legislatn for LGBT+ dividuals and lack of reurse for transgenr dividuals to change their legal genr; multifaceted stigma and discrimatn the tnal system; social isolatn and excln fai; disproportnate prevalence of sexual vlence and reluctance to report to police; discrimatn and margalizatn employment; and LGBT+ dispari health and mental health. Future rearch and programmatic iativ on LGBT+ cln Thailand should aim to addrs: 1) unrstudied populatns—lbian and bisexual women, transmascule persons; 2) unrreprented topics, cludg nstrats to LGBT+ advocy; 3) strategic policy iativ around anti-discrimatn laws and legal regnn of same-sex marriage and fai; and 4) the need for nsistent llectn of disaggregated data on LGBT+ persons tn, fay, enomic, personal secury/vlence, and health domas orr to asss ditors of cln and progrs advancg human rights for LGBT+ people Thailand.
Contents:
HOW THAILAND IS BLAZG TRAILS ON GAY RIGHTS, LEGALIZG MARIJUANA
* lgbt rights in thailand *
Gay men and transgenr women were the primary fol populatns the peer-reviewed lerature, LGBT+ people as a whole the grey lerature.
The fluence of mory strs on ditors of suicidaly among lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr adults Thailand. Are mentia servic and support anisatns meetg the needs of Lbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgenr (LGBT) regivers of LGBT people livg wh mentia? Behavral health and experience of vlence among cisgenr heterosexual and lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, queer and qutng, and asexual (LGBTQA+) adolcents Thailand.
The Land of S is a gay-iendly playground of brazen lady boys and sexual license, right? Well, not que * lgbt rights in thailand *
Genr and sexualy mental health: perspectiv on lbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenr (LGBT) rights and mental health the ASEAN regn. A spg review of lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, queer, and tersex (LGBTQI+) people's health India. Poverty, Psychologil Distrs, and Suicidaly Among Gay Men and Transgenr Women Sex Workers Durg the Covid-19 Panmic Phet, Thailand.
State-sponsored homophobia. Geneva: Internatnal Lbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Associatn (ILGA); 2019.
Challeng for the well-beg of and health equy for lbian, gay, and bisexual people Puerto Ri. BackgroundThe cln of lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT), and other persons outsi of heteronormative and cisgenr inti (i.
Explore our gay travel gui to Thailand featurg LGBTQ+ safety tips, gay rights , top ci & attractns, where to stay and more! * lgbt rights in thailand *
Of the 76 articl, 42% (n = 32) focsed on gay men or men who have sex wh men (MSM); among the, the majory (n = 18 articl) ed or clud the term “gay” or “gay men” (one ed “homosexual”), while the remar only ed the behavral termology, MSM. As the latter may clu men who self-intify as heterosexual, bisexual, or gay, we heretofore refer to the broar tegory as gay men and other MSM.
Thirty-two articl foced on transgenr women (12 of the addrsed both gay men and transgenr populatns). Of the remag grey lerature sourc, 7 focsed on gay men and other MSM, 5 on transgenr persons (2 on transgenr women, 1 on transmascule dividuals), 4 targeted the general populatn, and 1 ncentrated on lbian women, bisexual women, transgenr persons and tersex vast majory (97%; 38/39) of the grey lerature clud was published after 2010; the only exceptn was a 2007 report by Thailand’s Natnal Human Rights Commissn.
A World Bank [8] study (n = 2302) dited that 23% of transgenr people, 11% of lbian women, and 6% of gay men reported that they had experienced discrimatn accsg some form of tn or trag servic. In some fai, beg gay is viewed as a fect and there may be tense prsure to adopt heteronormative mannerisms and fd an ‘appropriate’ heterosexual partner; failure to nform risks loss of face for the fay, and the subsequent rejectn of the gay fay member [88] LGBT+ dividuals appear to manage this prsure wh actns rarely scribed Wtern ntexts.