The study replit the first European field experiment on gay men's labor market prospects Greece. Utilizg the same protol as the origal study 2006-2007, two follow-up field experiments took place 2013-2014 and 2018-2019. The
Contents:
- SEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MEN
- SEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MEN
SEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MEN
The study replit the first European field experiment on gay men’s labor market prospects Greece. Utilizg the same protol as the origal s * labor market gay *
Rponnts d as “LGBT” clu those who reported that 1) they were “Gay or lbian, ” “Bisexual, ” and/or “Transgenr”; 2) their genr assigned at birth was “Male” and that their current genr inty is “Female”; and/or 3) their genr assigned at birth was “Female” and that their current genr inty is “Male. Moreover, the rults suggted that monthly unemployment bore an associatn wh occupatnal accs nstrats and wage sortg vanci offerg lower remuneratn for gay men.
Acrdg to the fdgs, 2013–2014 and 2018–2019, firms excludg gay applints exprsed a higher level of taste- and statistil-discrimatn attus pared to 2006–2007. A gay rights backlash due to the LGBTIQ+ group’s attempt to advance s agenda, risg far-right rhetoric, and prejudice associated wh enomic downturns experienced Greece might rrpond wh creasg bias agast gay men. 1 IntroductnThe existence of enomic dispari between heterosexual and gay men n perhaps be put down to homophobia (Badgett 2020; Valfort 2020; OECD 2019; Drydakis 2019; Hammarstedt et al.
Gay men enunter unique challeng such as excln, bullyg, and poverty (Badgett 2020; Drydakis and Zimmermann 2020; OECD 2019; Drydakis 2019; Hammarstedt et al. For stance, the first European field experiment on gay men’s labor market prospects took place Greece between 2006 and 2007 (Drydakis 2009).
SEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MENSEXUAL ORIENTATN DISCRIMATN THE LABOR MARKET AGAST GAY MEN
* labor market gay *
Sce then, no further field rearch was nducted the untry, makg impossible to asss whether a change gay men’s societal approval and labor market out occurred. The theory dit that discrimatn efficients rporate the fluence of characteristics unrelated to productivy, such as homophobic attus agast gay men (Drydakis 2014).
Moreover, the theory dit that if employers are homophobic, they might pay mori lower wag for siar productivy to pensate for the psychologil loss they experience associatg wh members of such groups. If the distast for the gay men is high enough, employers might ci not to employ them their statistil discrimatn theory (Phelps 1972; Arrow 1973; 1998) propos that the age of average group characteristics to predict dividual productivy and set rrpondg wag n rrectly evaluate the productivy of workers who are atypil of their mory mographic characteristic.