One do not have to be a homophobe or bigot to believe that the Supreme Court ma a tragic error today creatg out of th air an imagary right for gay marriage.
Contents:
- ARTICL ON GAY MARRIAGE
- GAY MARRIAGE: WHY SUPREME COURT GOT WRONG
- HOW A GAY-MARRIAGE STUDY WENT WRONG
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
ARTICL ON GAY MARRIAGE
In most public discsns, the issue of same-sex marriage is posed as a simple qutn – for or agast? – where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t… * gay marriage is wrong article *
5, 2022Follow our live verage of the Supreme Court heargs that ps ee speech agast gay rights. “You’ve got a ton of people who have entered to gay marriag, and would be more than a ltle chaotic for the urt to do somethg that somehow dispted those marriag that have been entered to acrdance wh the law, ” Mr.
GAY MARRIAGE: WHY SUPREME COURT GOT WRONG
Browse Gay marriage news, rearch and analysis om The Conversatn * gay marriage is wrong article *
Lears did not officially stct their members to vote no, acrdg to two people faiar wh the ternal discsns, makg the vote more a matter of personal bloc of Republins who supported the measure amounted to ls than a quarter of the party nference, but that was a far greater proportn than gay rights legislatn has drawn the past om G. ” Her sister, Mary Cheney, is gay and married wh children, and Liz Cheney’s earlier opposn had ed a rift the famo fay.
– where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people.
HOW A GAY-MARRIAGE STUDY WENT WRONG
* gay marriage is wrong article *
Although don’t get much airtime beyond queer unterpublics, there is an adamantly left-wg, progrsive and pro-gay perspective that suggts same-sex marriage is not a necsary good. Lbian and gay muni, and the femist muni wh which they have historilly overlapped, have long celebrated the valu of sexual diversy over the sexual nformy reprented by marriage and the ethil importance of sexual straight-talkg rather than the double-standards so equently observed marriage’s vicy. Gay men and lbians n sneak around wh the bt of them, of urse, but marriage, as is legally fed, generat ndns for dishonty, disavowal and sexual hypocrisy.
There’s a tenncy among s proponents to reprent same-sex marriage as the fal chapter the story of gay acceptance, “the last civil right” as has sometim exaggeratedly been lled. It is large part bee of femist and gay novatns livg that marriage today is creasgly unrstood not as a relig but a social relatn; characterised not by male domatn but equaly and mutualy between the sex; valued not terms of s ntractual basis but terms of s ongog ntributn to a person’s sense of well-beg; and mataed not until ath-do--part but for as long as both parti fd satisfactn .
Rather than adm lbians and gay men to marriage as currently nceived, we should avow more fully the range of optns that characterise a lot of our liv and livg arrangements. Why not support and regnise the alternative timaci that gay muni, among others, have been velopg for s?
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
Maria Konnikova wr about a gay-marriage study that was wily admired after s publitn last year but now looks spect. * gay marriage is wrong article *
The argument favor of extendg legal marriage to same-sex upl pends primarily on wantg to extend the benefs and privileg of marriage to lbian and gay upl. Allowg gay men and lbians to marry will not stop marriage om beg exclnary.
In regnisg some gay and lbian relatnships as marriag, same-sex marriage emphasis the ntued illegimacy of other sexual arrangements and the ntued excln of other social actors.
Now this ragtag bunch might not seem as worthy of social protectn and prtige as the lovg, rg, long-term gay and lbian upl that are the shy new poster boys and girls for same-sex marriage. 2 Furthermore, as some have observed, homosexuals do enjoy the privilege to marry, so long as they do so wh someone of the oppose sex. This might seem to be an empty or even mockg pot bee ignor the distct sexual sir of homosexuals.