Maria Konnikova wr about a gay-marriage study that was wily admired after s publitn last year but now looks spect.
Contents:
- ARTICL ON GAY MARRIAGE
- GAY MARRIAGE: WHY SUPREME COURT GOT WRONG
- HOW A GAY-MARRIAGE STUDY WENT WRONG
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
ARTICL ON GAY MARRIAGE
In most public discsns, the issue of same-sex marriage is posed as a simple qutn – for or agast? – where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t… * gay marriage is wrong article *
5, 2022Follow our live verage of the Supreme Court heargs that ps ee speech agast gay rights.
“You’ve got a ton of people who have entered to gay marriag, and would be more than a ltle chaotic for the urt to do somethg that somehow dispted those marriag that have been entered to acrdance wh the law, ” Mr. Lears did not officially stct their members to vote no, acrdg to two people faiar wh the ternal discsns, makg the vote more a matter of personal bloc of Republins who supported the measure amounted to ls than a quarter of the party nference, but that was a far greater proportn than gay rights legislatn has drawn the past om G. ” Her sister, Mary Cheney, is gay and married wh children, and Liz Cheney’s earlier opposn had ed a rift the famo fay.
– where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t get much airtime beyond queer unterpublics, there is an adamantly left-wg, progrsive and pro-gay perspective that suggts same-sex marriage is not a necsary good. Lbian and gay muni, and the femist muni wh which they have historilly overlapped, have long celebrated the valu of sexual diversy over the sexual nformy reprented by marriage and the ethil importance of sexual straight-talkg rather than the double-standards so equently observed marriage’s vicy.
GAY MARRIAGE: WHY SUPREME COURT GOT WRONG
Browse Gay marriage news, rearch and analysis om The Conversatn * gay marriage is wrong article *
Gay men and lbians n sneak around wh the bt of them, of urse, but marriage, as is legally fed, generat ndns for dishonty, disavowal and sexual hypocrisy.
There’s a tenncy among s proponents to reprent same-sex marriage as the fal chapter the story of gay acceptance, “the last civil right” as has sometim exaggeratedly been lled. It is large part bee of femist and gay novatns livg that marriage today is creasgly unrstood not as a relig but a social relatn; characterised not by male domatn but equaly and mutualy between the sex; valued not terms of s ntractual basis but terms of s ongog ntributn to a person’s sense of well-beg; and mataed not until ath-do--part but for as long as both parti fd satisfactn . Rather than adm lbians and gay men to marriage as currently nceived, we should avow more fully the range of optns that characterise a lot of our liv and livg arrangements.
Why not support and regnise the alternative timaci that gay muni, among others, have been velopg for s? The argument favor of extendg legal marriage to same-sex upl pends primarily on wantg to extend the benefs and privileg of marriage to lbian and gay upl. Allowg gay men and lbians to marry will not stop marriage om beg exclnary.
HOW A GAY-MARRIAGE STUDY WENT WRONG
One do not have to be a homophobe or bigot to believe that the Supreme Court ma a tragic error today creatg out of th air an imagary right for gay marriage. * gay marriage is wrong article *
In regnisg some gay and lbian relatnships as marriag, same-sex marriage emphasis the ntued illegimacy of other sexual arrangements and the ntued excln of other social actors. Now this ragtag bunch might not seem as worthy of social protectn and prtige as the lovg, rg, long-term gay and lbian upl that are the shy new poster boys and girls for same-sex marriage. 2 Furthermore, as some have observed, homosexuals do enjoy the privilege to marry, so long as they do so wh someone of the oppose sex.
This might seem to be an empty or even mockg pot bee ignor the distct sexual sir of homosexuals. Like heterosexuals, many lbian, gay, and bisexual people want to form stable, long-lastg relatnships and many of them do.
In fact, rearchers have found that the majory of lbian, and gay, adults are mted relatnships and many upl have been together 10 or more years. Empiril rearch also shows that lbian and gay upl have levels of relatnship satisfactn siar to or higher than those of heterosexual upl. How do laws that lim marriage to heterosexuals affect gay and lbian people?
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
* gay marriage is wrong article *
The fai and iends of lbian and gay upl who are nied marriage rights may also experience negative physil and mental health nsequenc siar to those experienced by their loved on. The vast majory of scientific studi that have directly pared lbian and gay parents wh heterosexual parents have nsistently shown that the same-sex upl are as f and pable parents as heterosexual upl, and that their children are jt as psychologilly healthy and well adjted. A schism over gay marriage has led to a spl the Anglin church Atralia.
Dmond Tutu is by far the most high-profile Ain, if not global, relig lear to support lbian and gay rights, and he has done so sce the 1970s. In an terview, law profsor Carlos Ball explas how gay rights activists and rporatns went om adversari to partners.
New York the early 1980s was a time of lerary salons, ncentrated ambn and a flowerg of gay cultural power.