Legal experts say the impact of Fulton v. Cy of Philalphia uld go beyond gay rights and impact nondiscrimatn protectns more broadly.
Contents:
- SUPREME COURT BACKS CATHOLIC AGENCY CASE ON GAY RIGHTS AND FOSTER CARE
- ADOPTN AGENCY SHOULD BE ABLE TO REJECT GAY UPL, TMP ADMISTRATN ARGU
- OUR PARENTS ARE GAY. ARE OUR FAI GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE SUPREME COURT?
- SUPREME COURT TO HEAR CASE ON GAY RIGHTS AND FOSTER CARE
SUPREME COURT BACKS CATHOLIC AGENCY CASE ON GAY RIGHTS AND FOSTER CARE
* philadelphia gay adoption case *
""We do not doubt that this tert is a weighty one, for '[o]ur society has e to the regnn that gay persons and gay upl nnot be treated as social outsts or as ferr digny and worth, '" Roberts wrote, quotg the 2018 se Masterpiece Cakhop v. AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe unanimo lg was further evince that claims of relig liberty almost always prevail the current Cortez/Associated PrsWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court led unanimoly on Thursday that a Catholic social servic agency Philalphia uld fy cy l and refe to work wh same-sex upl who apply to take foster cisn, the latt clash between antidiscrimatn prcipl and claims of nscience, was a setback for gay rights and further evince that relig groups almost always prevail the current urt’s surprisg nsens on a se that pted gay rights agast relig rights masked ep divisns, wh the three most nservative jtic issug tic ncurrg opns cricizg the cisn as excsively timid and so narrow as to be Jtice John G.
ADOPTN AGENCY SHOULD BE ABLE TO REJECT GAY UPL, TMP ADMISTRATN ARGU
Lawyers for the agency rpond that merely wanted to ntue work that had been dog for centuri, addg that no gay uple had ever applied to . “Bee the agency unrstands the certifitn of prospective foster fai to be an endorsement of their relatnships, will not certify unmarried upl — regardls of their sexual orientatn — or same-sex married upl, ” he wrote, addg that the agency “do not object to certifyg gay or lbian dividuals as sgle foster parents or to placg gay and lbian children. More about Adam LiptakA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 1 of the New York edn wh the headle: Court Supports Catholic Agency In Dispute on Gay Foster Parents.
OUR PARENTS ARE GAY. ARE OUR FAI GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE SUPREME COURT?
A lawsu that ps relig eedom agast gay rights — and has been perlatg through the urt system and natnal news for two years — is officially on the Supreme Court’s month, the high urt agreed to hear Fulton v. The anizatn argued that to provi the servic to gay upl vlated s nstutnal rights to ee relig exercise and ee speech.
SUPREME COURT TO HEAR CASE ON GAY RIGHTS AND FOSTER CARE
Philalphia was workg s way through the lower urts, the Supreme Court livered a victory to Christian baker Jack Phillips, owner of Colorado’s Masterpiece Cakhop, another se alg wh gay rights and relig lg for Phillips was narrow and did not dite how the high urt unrstands the nstutnal qutn of whether relig dividuals actg good fah are entled to exemptns om nondiscrimatn laws, acrdg to Ball. Over 21 percent of gay upl are raisg adopted children, pared wh 3 percent of straight upl, and nearly 3 percent of gay upl have foster children, pared wh 0.