Contents:
GAY MARRIAGE AND THE CURSE OF RUMPELSTILTSK
Now is a good time to discs this issue beyond the squeaky-clean se for gay marriage that has been marketed to well-tend, and some s gullible, straight alli. First, let's dispense wh the mdl myths and rctive marriage will do nothg to addrs the five real-life cris facg people wh same-sex attractns, many of whom do not end up lifelong uplgs: prsn, eatg disorrs, suici, sexually transmted diseas, and bulli, biblil vers, Republins, and chicken sandwich imprars may e some hurt feelgs, the five aforementned cris are overwhelmgly the rult of the way gays treat one another. Straight people do gays no favors by feelg guilty and then bldly endorsg the mands of gay activists, who are largely rponsible for the currents of gay culture and therefore the state of gay people's liv.
I n see where gay activism me om. This reprsn was agast "homosexuals, " a group first labeled and classified the 1860s by snoopg and perhaps priggish Victorian scientists. To end the century of police raids, surveillance, and vlent supprsn, gay activists chose to embrace a certa iology about man's relatn to the rnal realm.
After 1969s famo Stonewall revolt New York Cy, the movement based s empowerment on the notn that people are gay agast their will and n't help actg the way they ia was that they uld fend their pleasur as a civil rights movement, bee their inty as homosexual was as natural and unavoidable as the lor of a person's sk. Soon, too, there veloped a fanatil belief that gay people had "gaydar" and uld sense another person's homosexualy, no matter how hidn, through one reckls fet, the gay movement njoed a natural tra like pigmentatn wh behavr and soon sisted that not only they, but all people, were erned by mandat their bloodstream.