From the emergence of homosexualy as a subculture to the fn of "mp" and the creatn of the Gay Liberatn Front, this article explor the perceptn of male homosexualy the Uned Kgdom om the 19th century to the prent." name="scriptn
Contents:
GAY HISTORY: SODOMY; THE LAW ENGLAND, 1290-1885
* homosexuality medieval england *
” In this later perd, we see a newfound homophobic ristance to the re that, the reactn’s vrl, speaks to the role this re uld really play for men mtg themselv to each other: The Patriarch’s words acknowledge the realy that no matter s tentn, the re enabled the space for sexual timaci between men. The works of Jefey Weeks (Comg Out: Homosexual Polics Bra om the Neteenth Century to the Prent, 1977), Sebastian Buckle (The Way Out: A History of Homosexualy Morn Bra, 2015) and Annamarie Jagose (Queer Theory: An Introductn, 1996) are our ma pots of reference and the article draws heavily on a talk given by Jefey Weeks at the LGBT centre on 3rd April, 2019 Lyon (()).
Both the Gay Liberatnist and Femist Movements manifted a latent fear of the ‘mascule lbian’ takg over the disurse of the groups aforementned; for this reason, lbians remaed outsts both, and were forced to rema distct om both the homosexual as well as the femist e. In the 19th century (and ntug well to the 20th century), homosexualy was a matter of changg moral standards, and the public opn on the subject was extremely negative: homosexualy symbolised nce and an crease licent behavur that need to be ntrolled. The armed forc were stricter terms of penalisatn of homosexualy the 19th century than the laws that applied to the general public: this was perhaps bee they were a symbol of patrtism and masculy for the untry (Weeks, 13).
5 GAY BRISH KGS AND QUEENS OM HISTORY
Many gay and bisexual monarchs kept their love liv wh members of the same sex a closely guard secret. * homosexuality medieval england *
Onanism and homosexualy were treated wh equal severy, and homosexualy particular was seen as “‘the secret s’ which has been learned at a private school, imported to a public school, and there tght to the youngt boys, [and which] will produce the more fashnable vic of the larger society. This belief was le wh the 1860s bate about ‘nate’ and ‘acquired’ tras, which meant by rollary that homosexualy was nate some dividuals (and the were the s beyond help), while the others followed the nt culture prevalent at the time (Weeks, 25).
The words “clean” and “unselfish” unrle a ntued belief the opn of the 19th century that homosexualy is a reflectn of “public-school ‘immoraly’” (Weeks, 16) and of an unntrolled male lt that is the root e of many social problems society. “The gay liberatn movement was self a product of the breakdown of the rigid taboos about sex which had blighted liv for generatns, but went further to qutn not only mos of sexual behavur but rigid genr divisns themselv.