Home - Gay SA Rad

Contents:

• GAY BARS SAN ANTON
• GAY MEN UNR THE NAZI REGIME
• THE 10 GAYEST STAT IN AMERI FOR 2020
• ERNST RöHM, THE HIGHT-RANKG GAY NAZI

GAY BARS SAN ANTON

Say “gay Texas” and most people are likely to image club hoppg At, Dallas, or even Hoton. A proment drag performer, pageant wner, and owner of the Miss Gay San Anton pageant, she picks at a plate of hh puppi wh wildflower honey and entertas my qutns. San Anton gay bars are a popular statn for not only the cy’s gay men, but for straight men and women terted havg a “gay old time”.

The cy’s gay bars feature large, outdoor celebratns (not unlike a gay pri para) that attract people of all strip that wish to be entertaed by a group of eclectic and unique sgers and dancers. While not exclive any sense, some gay bars are signated for only certa typ of patrons (i. Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, 1995 (same-sex life partnerships as the only “njugal relatnship” available to gay and lbian upl the absence of civil partnerships or marriage).

Rather, foced on termg whether Sectn 25(5) unjtifiably limed the nstutnal rights of same-sex partners who were a life partnership, which was “the only form of njugal relatnship open to gays and lbians”. Gays and lbians were exclud om the possibily of obtag the benef bee they were unable to marry, and the fact that they were nsequently exclud om Sectn 25(5) nstuted unjtifiable sexual orientatn discrimatn.

GAY MEN UNR THE NAZI REGIME

The immigratn law was found to rerce harmful stereotyp of gay and lbian relatnships as havg lower stat than their heterosexual unterparts. The Court emphasised that “the fay and fay life which gays and lbians are pable of tablishg wh their foreign natnal same-sex partners are all signifint rpects distguishable om those of spo and human terms as important to gay and lbian same-sex partners as they are to spo”. Sectn 25(5) also limed the rights of gay and lbian people relatn to the nstutnal guarantee unr Article 10 that “everyone has herent digny and the right to have their digny rpected and protected”.

The Court held that, bee did not extend to foreign natnal same-sex partners, Sectn 25(5) sent a msage that “gays and lbians lack the herent humany to have their fai and fay liv rpected or protected”. The Court, therefore, held that the limatn that Sectn 25(5) placed on the nstutnal rights of gays and lbians to equaly and digny had no reasonable jtifitn. To prevent foreign natnal same-sex life partners om receivg the benef of Sectn 25(5) unjtly and equably prived gay and lbian South Ains of rights to which they were nstutnally entled.

The Nazi regime rried out a mpaign agast male homosexualy between 1933 and 1945. It is unclear how many of the men publicly or privately intified as gay or were part of gay muni and works that had been tablished Germany before the Nazi rise to power.

THE 10 GAYEST STAT IN AMERI FOR 2020

They also arrted large numbers of gay men unr Paragraph 175. It is important to note that not all of the men arrted and nvicted unr Paragraph 175 intified as gay.

ERNST RöHM, THE HIGHT-RANKG GAY NAZI

Intifyg as a gay man was never explicly crimalized Germany.

However, the Nazi mpaign agast homosexualy and the regime’s zealo enforcement of Paragraph 175 ma life Nazi Germany dangero for gay men. Gay men Germany were not a monolhic group, nor did the Nazi regime view them as such. However, other factors also shaped gay men’s liv durg the Nazi era.

This diversy meant that gay men had a wi range of experienc Nazi Germany. For example, gay men active anti-Nazi polil movements risked beg arrted as polil opponents. And gay Jewish men faced Nazi persecutn and mass murr as Jews.