This is a phrase you ask someone if they do somethg dly gay to make sure you’re still a virg and not gay bee everybody knows if you have sex wh socks then u still a virg, but if you have sex wh another guy and you have socks on, ’s not gay. It don’t always have to be sexual tho, like if a homie licks you or hugs you and u have socks, then you not gay. This phrase is kd of like the send ndom to the phrase “no homo”. It’s jt extra protectn y’know." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn
Contents:
'S NOT GAY IF YOU HAVE SOCKS ON
If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to ." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn * not gay if you have socks on *
If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to homie was upset about not gettg head last night so John said fuck I got socks on I’ll suck !
He took up the ass by 6 dus that shs gay! Nah he had socks on so ’s okay bee of the sock the Sock le you have 'socks on' your feet any homosexual actns or statements beg ma holds a stat of beg unniably 'not gay'. This le appli to past, prent, and future events that socks are worn at the time someone challeng if dividual is mtg an act that is gay, the dividual qutn mt quickly claim whether or not they have 'socks on' or not.
S NOT GAY IF YOU HAVE YOUR SOCKS ON
* not gay if you have socks on *
This is done to terme the orientatn(level of gay) of said event. A third part is allowed to ask if socks where worn if 'socks on' stat is not an actn or event is challenged, and if the dividual partakg the event or actn only has one sock on, the dividual qutn has the right to terme the effectivens of their sock g the chart two socks on is unniably 'not gay'. Havg one sock on or socks that are loted beyond the feet regardls of amount are nsired ambiguo and is the rponsibily of the wearer to terme if was 'gay', 'partially gay', 'half gay', or 'not gay'.