The Supreme Court’s nservative majory led a Christian graphic artist who wants to sign weddg webs n refe to work wh gay upl, a setback for LGBTQ+ people and another w for relig platiffs.
Contents:
- FOTTEN URT SE SHOWS HOW A CALIFORNIA SCHOOLTEACHER WAS PERSECUTED FOR BEG GAY
- THE SUPREME COURT L FOR A SIGNER WHO DON’T WANT TO MAKE WEDDG WEBS FOR GAY UPL
FOTTEN URT SE SHOWS HOW A CALIFORNIA SCHOOLTEACHER WAS PERSECUTED FOR BEG GAY
A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. * case editrici gay *
Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. The revelatn distracts om Smh's victory at a time when she might have been baskg her w, which is wily nsired a setback for gay rights. Supreme Court victory after refg to make a gay uple's weddg ke, cg his Christian fah.
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe se may settle a qutn left open 2018: how to rencile claims of relig liberty wh laws barrg discrimatn based on sexual Kirkpatrick for The New York TimWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed on Tuday to hear an appeal om a Colorado web signer who objects to providg servic for same-sex marriag, returng the jtic to a battleground the culture wars ptg claims of relig eedom agast laws prohibg discrimatn on the basis of sexual urt last nsired the clash 2018, when a siar dispute between a Colorado baker and a gay uple failed to yield a five precise qutn the jtic agreed to ci the new se is “whether applyg a public-acmodatn law to pel an artist to speak or stay silent vlat the ee speech clse of the First Amendment. It ncerns Lorie Smh, who owns a webse sign pany that says serv gay ctomers but tends to lim s weddg-related servic to celebratns of heterosexual unns.
”A Colorado law forbids discrimatn agast gay people by bs open to the public as well as statements announcg such discrimatn. ”Lower urts have generally sid wh gay and lbian upl who were refed service, lg that they are entled to equal treatment, at least parts of the untry wh laws forbiddg discrimatn based on sexual owners of bs challengg those laws have argued that the ernment should not force them to choose between the requirements of their fahs and their livelihoods, cg nstutnal protectns for ee speech and relig Smh’s lawyers had also asked the Supreme Court to ci whether the Colorado law vlated her right to the ee exercise of relign and to nsir whether to overle an important precent om 1990, Employment Divisn v.
THE SUPREME COURT L FOR A SIGNER WHO DON’T WANT TO MAKE WEDDG WEBS FOR GAY UPL
What happened when the wrong person picked up the phone kicked off a legal battle that, as the Supreme Court turns rightward five years after the legalizatn of gay marriage, is a wdow to a dark time for the LGBT muny. * case editrici gay *
More about Adam LiptakA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 16 of the New York edn wh the headle: Jtic Will Revis Free Speech Qutns In Gay Marriage Case. Forty hours after he was arrted for beg gay, Donald Odorizzi, a California schoolteacher, ma a cisn he would e to June 10, 1964, Odorizzi picked up his phone and started dialg numbers at random. In a time when homosexualy was nsired a psychiatric illns, Odorizzi was jt a distrght man, h off a breakup, lookg for someone to talk happened when the wrong person picked up the phone kicked off a long-fotten urt se that, as the Supreme Court turns rightward five years after the legalizatn of same-sex marriage, is a wdow to a dark time for the LGBTQ muny.