New laws due this summer will allow gay men who have had the same partner for three months or more to give blood
Contents:
- BLOOD DONATN BY GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
- LETTG GAY MEN DONATE BLOOD COULD HELP SOLVE A MAJOR HEALTH CRISIS
- U.K. ENDS RTRICTN ON GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN DONATG BLOOD
- MORE GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN COULD SOON DONATE BLOOD
- GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN CAN SOON DONATE BLOOD – BUT THERE’S A CATCH
- GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN’S VIEWS ON REFORMG BLOOD DONATN POLICY CANADA: A QUALATIVE STUDY
- NO CREASE HIV BLOOD DONATNS SCE L FOR GAY MEN WERE RELAXED
- BLOOD DONATN BY GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
BLOOD DONATN BY GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
Learn about feral regulatns related to blood donatn by Lbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgenr, Queer, Intersex, Asexual and Genr non-nformg (LGBTQ+) dividuals. * blood transfusion homosexual *
S., the Red Cross, along wh One Blood, Valant and partner LGBTQ+ muny health centers, are participatg a pilot study fund by the FDA select ci that uld potentially lead to chang for blood donor eligibily creria for gay and bisexual men. Current Food and Dg Admistratn (FDA) policy allows for gay and bisexual men to donate blood 3 months after their most recent sexual ntact wh another man if they meet all other eligibily creria. 27, 2023, FDA issued a draft guidance that propos to elimate the tomatic 3-month ferral of gay and bisexual men based on the agency analysis of the current data on HIV transmissn.
However, women who have recently had sex wh a gay or bisexual man may be ferred. Gay and bisexual men are eligible to donate three months after their last sexual enunter wh another man.
But there is one easily implementable solutn to the natnal blood-supply shortage that’s been available for years and uld be a lifele: allowg gay and bisexual men to donate eely. S., gay and bisexual men (often referred to as MSM, or “men who have sex wh men”) are not allowed to give blood if they’ve had sex wh another man the past three months. “It is my opn that we ntue to have a real problem wh laws and regulatns based on fear rather than science, ” she ntuatn of a MSM-specific barrier to givg is not only limg the blood supply, ’s unnecsary and “rooted homophobia, ” explas Perry N.
LETTG GAY MEN DONATE BLOOD COULD HELP SOLVE A MAJOR HEALTH CRISIS
Gay and bisexual men face a time-based ban on givg blood. But fairer practic uld help save over a ln people a year whout the risk of spreadg HIV. * blood transfusion homosexual *
”In 2015, theFDA loosened s rtrictn, permtg gay and bisexual men to donate blood as long as they hadn’t had sex wh another man the past year. For example, if you’re a gay man who wears ndoms durg sex, you lim your risk of ntractg HIV.
Same go for gay men who are married or a long-term monogamo relatnship. Conducted tanm wh the natn’s largt blood centers—the Amerin Red Cross, Valant, and OneBlood—the rearch effort will survey 2, 000 gay and bisexual men across the untry between the ag of 18 and 30 who have had sex wh at least one man the past three months. ”The policy change uld have a signifint posive effect on the mental health of gay and bisexual men, too.
It also puts gay and bisexual men at higher risk for acquirg HIV over time. “Social and stctural factors that e gay men to feel othered e them to engage risky sexual behavr, ” Halkis says.
U.K. ENDS RTRICTN ON GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN DONATG BLOOD
* blood transfusion homosexual *
So a ban like this isn’t jt harmful to the Amerin public; “’s credibly harmful to the gay muny, both emotnally and physilly. The first step is to sign GLAAD’s petn at You then n—and should—te those around you, “sce many people, cludg gay and bi men, don’t know that this ban exists, ” adds Lasky. Let them know you don’t support discrimatory practic that ban gay and bisexual men om dog their civic duty.
Prevly, gay and bisexual men England, Stland and Wal were not permted to donate wh three months of havg been sexually active, due to fears around the transmissn of HIV/AIDS and other fectns, spe studi showg no creased risk, as all donor sampl are tted Northern Ireland Blood Transfn Service has layed implementg the new creria until September, sayg needs more time to prepare for the December, followg a two-year-long study led by Brish blood servic and LGBTQ groups, the NHS announced would be revisg s creria effective this summer. Gay and bisexual men who had revered om vid-19 were also barred om donatg their plasma to U. Policy remas discrimatory as is based on “membership a group … rather than engagement risky behavr, such as unprotected sex, ” read a statement on the anizatn’s sexually active gay men are barred, said, a straight man or woman “who has had unprotected sex wh multiple partners over the same time ame wh no knowledge of their personal histori remas the donor pool.
Homosexual and Bisexual Individuals.
MORE GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN COULD SOON DONATE BLOOD
Gay and bisexual men are not tomatilly prevented om givg blood, but there are some blood donatn l for men who have sex wh men. * blood transfusion homosexual *
FemaleDiscretnaryAcceptAddnal InformatnThere is no evince that there is an creased risk of sexually transmted fectns homosexual or bisexual femal pared to heterosexual for ChangeThis is a new entry, bg the prev entri for 'Homosexual' and 'Bisexual' dividuals.
GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN CAN SOON DONATE BLOOD – BUT THERE’S A CATCH
Rearchers and activists have long lled for chang to blood donatn polici to end what is equently amed as unjtified bans or ferral perds for men who have sex wh men (MSM). Sce 2016, Canada, a man had to be abstent om all sexual ntact (anal or oral sex) wh other men for at least 12 months orr to be an eligible blood donor. As of June 3, 2019, this ferral perd was rced to 3 months. To better unrstand the acceptance of existg ferral polici and possible future policy, we nducted 47 -pth terviews wh a mographilly diverse sample of gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex wh men (GBM) Canada’s three largt ci: Vanuver, (n = 17), Toronto (n = 15), and Montreal (n = 15). Interviews were d NVivo 11 followg an ductive thematic analysis. We foc on men’s preferred policy directns and their opns about a policy change proposed by Canada’s blood operators: a 3-month ferral for all sexual activy between men. We terviewed GBM approximately one-year before this new ferral policy was approved by Health Canada. Most participants were opposed to any ferral perd relatn to MSM-specific sexual activy. A fair and safe policy was one that was the “same for everyone” and clud screeng for several risk factors durg the blood donatn procs wh no tegoril excln of all sexually active MSM. Participants believed that multiple “genr bld” and HIV ttg-related strategi uld be tegrated to the blood donatn procs. The preferenc for a move away om MSM-specific exclns aligned wh their opns ncerng the possible change to a 3-month MSM ferral, for which participants shared three overarchg perspectiv: (1) step the right directn; (2) ambivalence and uncertaty; and (3) not an improvement. A predomant assertn was that a change om a 12-month to a 3-month ferral perd would not rolve the fundamental issu of fairns and equy affectg blood screeng practic for GBM Canada. Many participants believed that blood donatn policy should be based on more up-to-date scientific evince ncerng risk factor asssment and HIV ttg. * blood transfusion homosexual *
[Blood transfn and homosexualy: Ethil nsiratns]. Sce the ntext of the ntamated blood affair 1983, the homosexual male were exclud om the blood donatn France. The fect risk the homosexual male is higher for the human immunoficiency vis (HIV) than the rt of the populatn.
Blood donatn; Discrimatn; Don du sang; Homosexualy; Homosexualé; Legislatn; Législatn; Preutnary prciple; Prcipe préutn; Rponsabilé; Rponsibily. The lifetime rtrictn on blood donatns ma by gay and bisexual men that quickly beme policy was tend to help stop the spread of AIDS. The ADVANCE study (Asssg Donor Variabily And New Concepts Eligibily) is examg the impact of changg the screeng qutnnaire to ask gay and bisexual men about specific behavrs that raise fectn risk, rather than requirg sexual abstence for the prev three months.
GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN’S VIEWS ON REFORMG BLOOD DONATN POLICY CANADA: A QUALATIVE STUDY
Can gay men give blood? Gay and bisexual men are not tomatilly prevented om givg blood.
“Current and former blood donatn polici ma unfound assumptns about gay and bisexual men and really entangled dividuals’ inty wh their likelihood of havg HIV, ” Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, an advocy group, tells Matthew Perone of the Associated Prs (AP).
Gay Rights,. Siarly, is worth notg and appldg the fact that May the Food and Dg Admistratn fally eased s-old rtrictns that prevented gay and bisexual men om donatg blood whout first abstag om sexual activy for three months.
NO CREASE HIV BLOOD DONATNS SCE L FOR GAY MEN WERE RELAXED
Now, gay and bisexual men will be able to donate blood, Cross/The Denver Post via Getty ImagThe Food and Dg Admistratn on Monday lifted s 32-year ban on gay and bisexual men donatg blood, though still rtricted when they n ban had been put place to protect people om HIV, a vis most often passed through sexual ntact that n progrs to AIDS if left untreated. Unr the new regulatns, gay or bisexual men mt have abstaed om oral or anal sex wh another man for at least a year before donatg U.
People who have HIV, or who have exchanged sex for money or dgs, ntue to be banned om blood donatn groups will need to amend their qutnnair for screeng potential donors, the FDA was not able to ment about when gay and bisexual men uld beg givg blood. Are HIV-posive, and 50, 000 more are fected each year, wh gay and bisexual men beg disproportnately affected.
Data om 2011 show that an timated 57 percent of people livg wh an HIV diagnosis at the end of that year were gay and bisexual men, or gay and bisexual men who also jected likelihood of HIV beg ntracted through a blood transfn the U. The Natnal Gay Blood Drive, an anizatn that has phed to lift the ban, said a statement that the FDA had taken a “huge first step the right directn, ” but that the yearlong ferral still discrimated agast people based on their sexual Human Rights Campaign held the same posn. “We are mted to workg towards an eventual oute that both mimiz risk to the blood supply and treats gay and bisexual men wh the rpect they serve.
BLOOD DONATN BY GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN
MethodsTo better unrstand the acceptance of existg ferral polici and possible future policy, we nducted 47 -pth terviews wh a mographilly diverse sample of gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex wh men (GBM) Canada’s three largt ci: Vanuver, (n = 17), Toronto (n = 15), and Montreal (n = 15). Orsi and lleagu [14] elucidate the legacy of this tragedy:When news spread that Canada’s blood system was promised and thoands acquired HIV, and later hepatis C, as a rult of ernment wrongdog, the ia that HIV had affected so-lled “nocent” blood transfn recipients gave way to “otherg” dynamics that marked them off om groups perceived as morally culpable, cludg gay men, people who e dgs, and sex workers (see [15], p9) ial policy rponse of an fe ferral for some groups cludg MSM was remarkably durable Canada, remag unchanged until 2013 when the donatn policy was altered to a requirement of 5 years of abstence om any sexual activy between men [16].
Rearchers and activists have lled for further policy chang to rethk donatn ferrals specific to MSM, equently cg the blanket ferrals as beg homophobic, discrimatory, and illogil [8, 26, 27]. To meet the objectiv, we nducted -pth qualative terviews wh a mographilly diverse sample of gay, bisexual, queer and other men who have sex wh men (GBM) Canada’s three largt ci: Vanuver, Toronto, and Montreal. Perhaps not surprisgly, many of the participants tend to be olr, ditg a generatnal ponent to the perspectiv and knowledge on policy history among some men who were adults that lived through the early years of the AIDS participants believed that the origal lifetime ban was a rult of sufficient ttg technology, homophobia, and AIDS stigma.