Sex problems gay men face

gay loss of libido

Gay men experience more prsn and suici, but help is available.

Contents:

SEXUAL PROBLEMS AFFECTG GAY MEN

Gay and bisexual (GB) men wh prostate ncer (PCa) have been scribed as an “visible diversy” PCa rearch due to their lack of visib * gay loss of libido *

However, until recently, most rearch examg the impact of PCa on men’s sexualy has foced on the abily to achieve and mata an erectn for penile-vagal peratn (Wtman et al., 2009), assumg that men are long-term, monogamo, heterosexual relatnships, and implicly excludg the experienc of sgle and gay men (Asenc, Blank, Drt, & Crawford, 2009) the 19, 993 new s of PCa reported Atralia 2011 (Atralian Instute of Health and Welfare, 2015), nservative timat based on the rerd percentage of gay men the populatn, suggt that three to five percent are gay men (Sman, 2011). However, recent reviews of PCa tnal rourc and lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT) primary re guil report a arth of such rmatn (Dunn, Watson, Wtle, Mchell, & Dowsett, 2011; McNair & Hegarty, 2010), wh a few notable exceptns (Buchtg et al., 2015; Wong et al., 2013), and there is an absence of empiril rearch to rm s future velopment. This has led to GB men wh PCa beg scribed as an “visible diversy” (Blank, 2005), or a “hidn populatn” (Fililt et al., 2008) is some evince om recent survey-based rearch that gay men wh PCa report signifintly greater difficulti relatn to sexual functng (Motofei, Rowland, Popa, Kreienkamp, & Pni, 2011), urary, bowel and mental functng (Hart et al., 2014; Ussher et al., 2016), and ejaculatory bother (Wassersug, Lyons, Dunn, Dowsett, & Pts, 2013) parison wh heterosexual men.

THREAT OF SEXUAL DISQUALIFITN: THE CONSEQUENC OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTN AND OTHER SEXUAL CHANG FOR GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN WH PROSTATE CANCER

It has also been posed that gay men may ascribe different prri and meangs to sexual chang after PCa (Thomas, 2012), cludg the importance of the prostate as a se of pleasure durg anal sex; the signifince of visible ejaculate for “semen exchange” durg sex; the need for a firmer erectn for anal sex parison wh vagal sex; and the nsequenc of anal disfort and ntence for receptive partners (Fililt et al., 2008).

Ethil approval was granted by Wtern Sydney Universy Human Rearch Ethics Commtee and the ethics mte of participatg muny anizatns, and all participants gave specific 1 Socmographic characteristics of gay/bisexual men wh PCa and male partners of men wh PCaFull size table.

DEPRSN IS KILLG GAY MEN

” Many olr participants said that as gay or bisexual men they expected to ntue to have an active sexual life well to later life, wh Sam (74, gay) mentg that “gay men tend to engage sex for a longer perd, ” differentiatg himself om heterosexual men his age group, of whom he said “none of the men would be sexually active.

” This expectatn of ntued sexual activy provis some explanatn for the near uniformy acunts of distrs followg erectile difficulti olr participants, for example: “’s probably the most horrific thg that I’ve ever been through psychologilly” (Fn, 69, gay); “’s prsg.

” The magnu of this sense of loss is illtrated by Stt (59, gay), who said that “if I had the choice aga, I would take my risks wh the ncer, and not have the operatn, ” scribg the loss of erectns after robotic prostatectomy as “a fg moment my life…the impact on my life as a gay male has been really profound, and a negative sense. A number of men gave acunts of rencilg themselv to chang sexual functng, and velopg fulfillment through other activi: “ life if my sexual functn dimish further, there are other aspects of life that will take over om that which will ntue to make life satisfyg and rewardg” (Alex, 69, gay); “I have veloped more close and timate relatnships wh men that don’t clu sex” (Damon, 52, gay).

DEPRSN AND SUICIDALY GAY MEN: IMPLITNS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIRS

The acunts monstrate that for some men ial negative rpons to ED n be replaced by acceptance and absorptn other on Gay Inti: “Retired From the Gay Human Race” or Inty Re-evaluatnWhile erectile dysfunctn (ED) is wily regnized to have a potential impact on mascule inti, is the impact on gay inti that is intified Stt’s acunt of chang to his life as a “gay male, ” above. For example, Alex (69, gay) said: “my worth of self, my functng as a gay man, no, I don’t thk ’s particularly impacted” and Euan said there was “no real change, ” other than givg up his sexual posn as a “top” or sertive partner anal terurse, which he felt he “had to make the bt of.

*BEAR-MAGAZINE.COM* GAY LOSS OF LIBIDO

Threat of Sexual Disqualifitn: The Consequenc of Erectile Dysfunctn and Other Sexual Chang for Gay and Bisexual Men Wh Prostate Cancer | SprgerLk .

TOP