Register Rad: Makg Gay Okay and Martha’s Village| Natnal Catholic Register

Contents:

• MAKG GAY OKAY
• MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
• ROBERT REILLY’S “MAKG GAY OK” (EXCLIVE INTERVIEW)
• REGISTER RAD: MAKG GAY OKAY AND MARTHA’S VILLAGE
• MAKG GAY OKAY QUOT
• MAKG GAY OK: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
• WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?

MAKG GAY OKAY

Most prompts for gay porn, meanwhile, explibly flt to people of ambiguoly LatX scent wh an unrcut hairstyle. Is that ditive of the typ of gay porn the mols were traed on?

A gay uple, as picted by Unstable Diffn. It is important to note that the same-sex soc-sexual behavr observed the study is distct om homosexual behavr bee s motivatn and purpose are social, said Jean-Baptiste Le, who studi primate behavr at the Universy of Lethbridge Canada and was not volved the new rearch. To be classified as te homosexual behavr, the form, motivatn and functn would all have to be sexual nature, he said.

MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG

Why are Amerins beg forced to nsir homosexual acts as morally acceptable?

Where has the "gay rights" movement e om, and how has so easily nquered Ameri? The power of ratnalizatn—the means by which one mentally transforms wrong to right—driv the gay rights movement, giv s revolutnary character, and mak s advot fatigable.

ROBERT REILLY’S “MAKG GAY OK” (EXCLIVE INTERVIEW)

The homosexual e moved naturally om a plea for tolerance to cultural nqut bee the secury of s ratnalizatn requir universal acceptance.

At stake the ratnalizatn of homosexual behavr is realy self, which is why will have nsequenc that reach far beyond the issue at hand.

REGISTER RAD: MAKG GAY OKAY AND MARTHA’S VILLAGE

The further stutnalizatn of homosexualy will mean the triumph of force over reason, th unrmg the very foundatns of the Amerin Republic. "Robert Reilly shows that to go wh the flow of the homosexual movement is to go agast nature, science, children, marriage, the fay and the mon good; fact, to go agast mon sense.

MAKG GAY OKAY QUOT

p>"If you read only one book on homosexualy and the radil chang now beg stuted wh our culture, let be this one! " — Joseph Nilosi, PhD, Cofounr, Natnal Associatn for Rearch and Therapy of Homosexualy (NARTH).

p>"Ameri's lg class is shapg our society acrdg to s taste for homosexualy and s distaste for natural fai. "Robert Reilly explas how the acceptance of the ratnalizatn for homosexual behavr may brg down our culture and society unls is exposed, unrstood, and opposed.

His new book om Ignati Prs, Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg, my opn, is simply the bt one wrten up to now on this extremely ntent and ccial topic of our time. Reilly about his latt book, “Makg Gay OK: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg.

MAKG GAY OK: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG

He’s takg on what, the Year of the Lord 2014, is now touted and spouted as Gospel tth — that Gay is OK? He at om the vantage pot of a former actor, who knows the world of the theater, and s subculture, where gays make awe-spirg ntributns, but who are oh so vulnerable when the curta down; and later as a prcipled nservative the Reagan Whe Hoe, who believ “ias have nsequenc, ” and knows Socrat and Aristotle and argu om their perspective of reason.

You know I’m the arts as well, and you have this statement your troductn that “this crique of the homosexual e is not an attack on homosexuals, nor is generated by an anim agast them.

Y, I was both a profsnal actor my youth and I have wrten about classil mic for 35 years as a nsequence of which I have worked wh many homosexuals, particularly the mic world — some tly great posers. And, I have ocsnally been asked, "Why don’t you say anythg about their beg homosexual? If they told me there was somethg homosexual about their mic, then I would have had to addrs the subject.

WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?

So, though I felt impelled to wre this book, all my years, I have never been acced of discrimatg agast homosexuals or beg a you make a distctn between the person and the behavr. So the people who try to ialize classil Greece as some sort of homosexual heyday really misunrstand the suatn and ignore the fact that the creators of philosophy found om their own ratnal powers the moral standards by which to judge that act as morally od. Aristotle really don’t addrs the subject of homosexualy except a brief sentence when he remarks upon s disorr.

Now, Aristotle never addrsed the ia of homosexual marriage bee would be prehensible to him sce every act of sodomy is an act of un-chasty. Only the upper class were there the mentorg relatnships between an olr man and a teenage boy, which were sometim homosexual. To have two adult mal engaged homosexual behavr was all class of Greek society nsired beyond the pale.

So there are objective moral standards the Aristotelian school of thought which Man is the product of immutable Nature; and there are no objective moral standards the latter, which Man is the product of history and accint, which not only allows for homosexual marriage but jt about anythg seems like history and accint are wng the day.