Gay Knights, Transvt and Tolerance the Hamar episo of Ulrich's Frendienst: Kalamazoo, 2010
Contents:
- TEMPLARS AND SODOMY – WERE THE KNIGHTS REALLY GAY?
- GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010
TEMPLARS AND SODOMY – WERE THE KNIGHTS REALLY GAY?
Tony McMahon vtigat whether the Knights Templar were gay as has often been alleged bee sodomy was mentned at their trials * homosexuality among knights *
One er got que irate when I sisted you uldn’t classify the Templars as a medieval LGBT anisatn – though that’s not to say some of the knights weren’t gay.
GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010
If you were gay the Middle Ag, then jog a brotherhood of some scriptn was a good way to avoid that faiar and annoyg qutn at fay gathergs:. ” In this later perd, we see a newfound homophobic ristance to the re that, the reactn’s vrl, speaks to the role this re uld really play for men mtg themselv to each other: The Patriarch’s words acknowledge the realy that no matter s tentn, the re enabled the space for sexual timaci between men.
It's popularly known that the Knights Templar were charged unr the pretext of hery, but the list of charg also clus sodomy - was there proof of homosexualy among the Templars, or was this an unfound accatn ma for polil or propaganda reasons, to explo popular stigma? Assumg, as we mt, that at least some of the men’s sexual longgs were fulfilled, the next qutn is the extent to which timate homosexual relatnships were tolerated.
Views about homosexualy18-2930-4950-6465+Sample sizeShould be accepted22%34%28%17%13, 119Should be disuraged13%31%31%26%9, 416Neher/both equally13%36%31%20%1, 089Don't know10%34%27%29%896Sample siz and margs of error vary om subgroup to subgroup, om year to year and om state to state. Views about homosexualyYounger MillennialOlr MillennialGeneratn XBaby BoomerSilentGreattSample sizeShould be accepted14%14%28%33%11%1%13, 119Should be disuraged8%10%26%37%18%2%9, 416Neher/both equally7%11%31%37%13%1%1, 089Don't know6%10%29%33%20%3%896Sample siz and margs of error vary om subgroup to subgroup, om year to year and om state to state. Views about homosexualyMenWomenSample sizeShould be accepted40%60%13, 312Should be disuraged52%48%9, 649Neher/both equally49%51%1, 130Don't know41%59%957Sample siz and margs of error vary om subgroup to subgroup, om year to year and om state to state.