Tony McMahon vtigat whether the Knights Templar were gay as has often been alleged bee sodomy was mentned at their trials
Contents:
- TEMPLARS AND SODOMY – WERE THE KNIGHTS REALLY GAY?
- GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010
TEMPLARS AND SODOMY – WERE THE KNIGHTS REALLY GAY?
* homosexuality among knights *
One er got que irate when I sisted you uldn’t classify the Templars as a medieval LGBT anisatn – though that’s not to say some of the knights weren’t gay. If you were gay the Middle Ag, then jog a brotherhood of some scriptn was a good way to avoid that faiar and annoyg qutn at fay gathergs:.
GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010 GAY KNIGHTS, TRANSVT AND TOLERANCE THE HAMAR EPISO OF ULRICH'S FRENDIENST: KALAMAZOO, 2010
” In this later perd, we see a newfound homophobic ristance to the re that, the reactn’s vrl, speaks to the role this re uld really play for men mtg themselv to each other: The Patriarch’s words acknowledge the realy that no matter s tentn, the re enabled the space for sexual timaci between men.
It's popularly known that the Knights Templar were charged unr the pretext of hery, but the list of charg also clus sodomy - was there proof of homosexualy among the Templars, or was this an unfound accatn ma for polil or propaganda reasons, to explo popular stigma?