An overwhelmg share of Ameri’s lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr adults (92%) say society has bee more acceptg of them the past
Contents:
- L R GAY SUGGTS 10 OF LARGE POPULATNS AND 20 OF
- DIFFERENC DIG RATS BETWEEN GAY MEN WHO PREFER RECEPTIVE VERS SERTIVE SEX ROL DITE A ROLE FOR PRENATAL ANDROGEN
- DO SIZE REALLY MATTER? A SENSIVY ANALYSIS OF NUMBER OF SEEDS A RPONNT-DRIVEN SAMPLG STUDY OF GAY, BISEXUAL AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN VANUVER, CANADA
- GAY TT (MALE ONLY): THE TTH AWAS, MEN!
- ON THE VALIDY OF POPULAR MASCULY RATG SL WH GAY MEN
- WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATN IS GAY [UPDATED MAY 2023]
L R GAY SUGGTS 10 OF LARGE POPULATNS AND 20 OF
L R Gay suggts 10 of large populatns and 20 of small populatns as mimums om CAM NA at Manila Tytana Colleg * gay sample size *
Gay suggts 10% of large populatns and 20%of small populatns as mimums.
DIFFERENC DIG RATS BETWEEN GAY MEN WHO PREFER RECEPTIVE VERS SERTIVE SEX ROL DITE A ROLE FOR PRENATAL ANDROGEN
Among non-human mammals, exposure to androgens durg cril perds of velopment leads to gynephilia (attractn to femal), whereas the absence or low levels of prenatal androgens leads to androphilia (attractn to mal). However, humans, retrospective markers of prenatal androgens have only been associated wh gynephilia among women, but not wh androphilia among men. Here, we asked whether an direct ditn of prenatal androgen exposure, 2D:4D, differs between subsets of gay men leated by anal sex role (ASR). ASR was ed as a proxy for subgroups bee ASR groups tend to differ other measur affected by bra sexual differentiatn, such as genr nformy. First, we replited the fdg that gay men wh a receptive ASR preference (bottoms) report greater genr nonnformy (GNC) pared to gay men wh an sertive ASR preference (tops). We then found that Tops have a lower (male-typil) average right-hand dig rat than Bottoms, and that among all gay men the right-hand 2D:4D rrelated wh GNC, ditg that a higher (female-typil) 2D:4D is associated wh creased GNC. Differenc were found between non-exclive and exclive same-sex attractn and GNC, and ASR group differenc on dig rats do not reach signifince when all non-heterosexual men are clud the analys, suggtg greater heterogeney the velopment of non-exclive same-sex sexual orientatns. Overall, rults support a role for prenatal androgens, as approximated by dig rats, fluencg the sexual orientatn and GNC of a subset of gay men. * gay sample size *
It is left tothe stunt to weigh the factors of accuracy, st, homoge-ney of the accsible populatn, type of samplg andkd of study, and terme the bt sample size for the SampleThe fal step is to actually select a sample of pretermed size om the acc-sible of SamplgThere are several ways of dog this. He assigns numbersSimpleSystematicStratifiedClter7Gay, 114-1158Ary, 1629Gay, 105-7foeziSnoalupoPgnilpmaStnecreP001-0%001000, 1-101%01000, 5-100, 1%5000, 01-100, 5%3+000, 01%17-5Populatns and SamplgChapter 7©4th ed. They were dichotomoly classified as eher homosexual (n = 935) or heterosexual (n = 4187).
On all five measur, homosexual men reported larger penis than did heterosexual men. Handns is a bmarker of variatn anal sex role behavr and Relled Childhood Genr Nonnformy among gay men. In ntrast, the data do not support a role for prenatal androgens the velopment of differenc sexual orientatn among men, as nclud by the same two meta-analys4, the associatn wh 2D:4D and genr rol among female sexual orientatn, we hypothized that a subset of gay men who are more genr nonnformg may show a larger, ls male-typil, 2D:4D than more genr nformg gay men.
A growg body of work dit that anal sex role (ASR) preferenc may serve as a proxy for subgroups of gay men who differ velopment and genr nformy6, 7, 8, 9.
DO SIZE REALLY MATTER? A SENSIVY ANALYSIS OF NUMBER OF SEEDS A RPONNT-DRIVEN SAMPLG STUDY OF GAY, BISEXUAL AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN VANUVER, CANADA
* gay sample size *
Th, the prent study we asked whether gay men wh different ASR preferenc may differ 2D:4D.
We hypothized that gay men wh a Bottom ASR (receptive), who tend to be more genr nonnformg (GNC), would have a higher (more female-typil) average dig rat than ASR Tops (sertive), who tend to be more genr nformg. E., GNC and dig rats); of this total, 259 were male and 149 self-intified as gay men [i.
E., (1) dited that they were assigned male at birth, (2) intify wh male genr, (3) intify as gay and 4) report an exclive attractn to mal the last year], 125 of which dited their ASR preferenc, and 122 dited their ASR behavr.
GAY TT (MALE ONLY): THE TTH AWAS, MEN!
Confed about your sexual orientatn? Thk you might actually be gay? It's normal to wonr. Try this tt - uld help you nfirm one way or the other. * gay sample size *
E., gay men who dited their ASR preference), ag ranged om 19 to 71 (M = 39. 098) rats rrelate wh GNCAmong the entire sample of gay men, right-hand dig rats signifintly rrelated wh both Relled Childhood GNC (Pearson’s R = − 0.
For nsistency across measur, sre on the Relled Childhood GNC sle were subtracted by 5 and multiplied by negative 1 for graphil pictn of rults; Th, a higher sre on both the Childhood and Adulthood GNC graphs dit more genr size imageNon-exclive same-sex attractn, GNC and dig ratsThe prcipal analys above asssed ASR differenc GNC and dig rats among gay men, whereas other non-heterosexual men were exclud om the analys as we hypothized that there may be more variabily velopmental procs fluencg sexual orientatn of men who display variatn same and oppose sex attractn and/or behavr. Here, we report analys on the fol measur cludg all non-heterosexual men: self-intified gay men (n = 149), self-intified bisexual men (n = 24), and men who self-intified as “other” (n = 18; self-labels clud: pansexual, asexual, nonbary, genrqueer, queer, heteroflexible, qutng, trans, and var forms of “I don’t label myself”). 05), wh bisexual men reportg the lowt childhood GNC followed by gay men, and the “other” group reported the hight differenc were also found on the adulthood GNC measure, F(2, 192) = 10.
001, and post hoc tts dited that while bisexual and gay men did not signifintly differ (p =. DiscsnWe replited the fdg that ASR groups differ both relled childhood GNC and adulthood GNC, as gay men wh an sertive ASR preference (self-intified Tops) were more genr nformg than men wh a receptive ASR preference (self-intified Bottoms).
ON THE VALIDY OF POPULAR MASCULY RATG SL WH GAY MEN
Gay neighborhoods across the Uned Stat are -ncentratg today’s so-lled “post-gay” era as sexual mori assiate to * gay sample size *
Fally, we found that across the entire sample of gay men, 2D:4D rats rrelated wh both relled childhood and adulthood measur of GNC, such that a more male-typil (lower) 2D:4D was associated wh more genr nformy. Altogether, the fdgs support a role for prenatal androgens fluencg ASR preference and genr nformy of gay fdg that 2D:4D rats differ a subset of gay men based on ASR and GNC rrponds well to the lerature on 2D:4D rats sexual orientatn women: self-intified “femme” and “butch” lbians differ their average dig rats such that the more genr nformg group (“femm”) had more female-typil (higher) 2D:4D rats3. However, even wh gay men, prenatal androgens may still have a modulatory effect on genr nformy and ASR preference.
Alternatively (although not mutually exclively), prenatal androgens may mediate a third variable such as sexual orientatn and/or body type which may fluence genr prent fdgs are nsistent wh prev lerature showg that gay men wh an sertive ASR preference display other ditors of high androgen exposure, cludg an earlier pubertal onset, creased height and body hair pared to both heterosexual men and other gay men19.
The fdgs together wh the current study suggt that gay men wh an sertive ASR may be exposed to higher levels of androgens throughout their lifpan, rather than, or addn to, receptive ASR gay men beg exposed to lower androgens prenatally. While there is generally high nrdance between preference and behavr, is likely that preference/fantasi rrpond more to ternal factors, whereas behavr is more nstraed by external nsiratns, such as the preferenc of sexual partners, and/or soc-cultural factors associated wh masculy and sex primary analys the prent study evaluated ASR group differenc GNC and dig rats among gay men, whereas other non-heterosexual men were exclud om the analys. Our analys of gay, bisexual and other non-heterosexual self-inti (i.
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATN IS GAY [UPDATED MAY 2023]
For stance, the three groups of non-heterosexual men differ GNC: both self-intified bisexual and gay men report lower relled childhood and adulthood GNC pared to the “other” group of non-heterosexual men, and bisexual men report lower childhood GNC pared to gay men. Th, while is possible that prenatal androgens ntribute to the sexual orientatn of some non-exclive same-sex oriented men, this prr work together wh the prent study suggts that the velopment of same-sex attractn among bisexual and other non-heterosexual men likely differs and/or may be more variable than gay is important to note the limatns of the prent study that should be taken to nsiratn.
The sample is also largely homogeneo wh rpect to ethnicy (~ 80% Whe), and prr work has dited that there are ethnic differenc dig rats (e.
We, as well as other labs, have ed this measure prr publitns, showg nsistent sex differenc and sexual orientatn differenc among ncln, we found that a retrospective approximatn of prenatal androgens, the 2D:4D rat, differs among ASR preference groups, suggtg that gay men who prefer a receptive ASR and who tend to be more genr nonnformg were exposed to a lower level of prenatal androgen than gay men who prefer an sertive ASR, who tend to be more genr nformg. The rults support the nroendocre hypothis that at least a subset of gay men may owe their sexual orientatn to a rctn prenatal androgens, although is possible that high levels of prenatal androgens uld also crease odds of androphilia among men. Fally, the rults are also nsistent wh the hypothis that there are multiple velopmental pathways unrlyg male sexual orientatn, and that future rearch should not nsir gay men as a homogeno group.