Why are upl the gay muny fightg so hard for gay marriage? This is a list of legal, fancial, and health benefs granted by marriage.
Contents:
- HETEROSEXUAL AND HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAG – ARE STRAIGHT AND GAY MARRIAG INTIL?
- GAY MARRIAGE: THE KEY TO HAPPS?
- GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
- 27 REASONS TO SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE
- HAPPS IN GAY MARRIAGE
- GAY MARRIAGE FULFILLS 'PURSU OF HAPPS'
HETEROSEXUAL AND HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAG – ARE STRAIGHT AND GAY MARRIAG INTIL?
Who knew? The legalizatn of gay marriage might make Californians happier. * gay marriage happiness *
Hodg legalized gay marriage natnwi, cludg the 14 stat that did not prevly allow gays and lbians to wed. Adults (37%) favored allowg gays and lbians to wed 2009, a share that rose to 62% 2017.
GAY MARRIAGE: THE KEY TO HAPPS?
For stance, 45% of adults the Silent Generatn (those born between 1928 and 1945) favor allowg gays and lbians to wed, pared wh 74% of Millennials (born between 1981 and 1996).
GAY MARRIAGE: THEOLOGIL AND MORAL ARGUMENTS
4As wh the general public, Amerins who intify as lbian, gay, bisexual or transgenr (LGBT) are most likely to ce love as a very important reason for gettg married. The first natn to legalize gay marriage was the Netherlands, which did so 2000.
Sce then, several other European untri – cludg England and Wal, France, Ireland, all of Sndavia, Spa and, most recently, Atria, Germany and Malta – have legalized gay marriage.
27 REASONS TO SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE
And May 2019, Taiwan beme the first untry Asia to allow gays and lbians to legally wed.
HAPPS IN GAY MARRIAGE
(Disclosure: The thors of this preview are affiliated wh the law firm that reprents the Rponnt Wdsor and prevly reprented parti ligatn claimg a right for gay and lbian upl to marry unr New York’s Constutn. Agast that background, the Nth Circu found that none of the reasons offered by s proponents to jtify Proposn 8 provid any nceivably ratnal basis for the whdrawal of that right and ferred that the only explanatn for Proposn 8 was mere disapproval of gay and lbian persons.
GAY MARRIAGE FULFILLS 'PURSU OF HAPPS'
Evans, [3] held that such a law nied equal protectn to California’s gay and lbian rints.
Bee of the California-specific circumstanc on which s analysis was premised, the Nth Circu found unnecsary to nsir, and exprsed no opn, as to “whether same-sex upl have a fundamental right to marry, or whether stat that fail to afford the right to marry to gays and lbians mt do so.
”[4]In the Supreme Court, the two lbian and gay upl who are challengg Proposn 8, urge a broar posn.