Are you qutng your sexualy? Fd out if you’re gay, straight, bisexual, or asexual. Learn what the terms mean and if they apply to you.
Contents:
LARRY HAWORTH'S LIST: GAY PORN TUBE
Larry Haworth's List: Gay Porn Tube * c/l gay *
99% of the people there are lookg for sex only, mak me feel sorry for the gay mal that are seekg real relatnships, they most likely won’t fd them here. A classic profile, Bremer wr, of “probable homosexual clatns. A rear might not make a nnectn: Lewis’ warm, nversatnal wrg voice was veloped for his iend who was, turned out, homosexual.
Arthur was readg Edward Carpenter, the Christian advote for homosexual acceptance — a startlg reference to fd Lewis’ early spirual bgraphy. Wilson later noted: “Arthur Greev was homosexual.
He produced a few “new” texts om Lewis’ archive that seemed to many rears very unlike Lewis, pecially the half-formed, strange novella, The Dark Tower, which had oddly sexual, even homoerotic featur. No one mentned that he was gay. Lewis Really Thk About Homosexualy?
AM I GAY?
Was C.S. Lewis gay? History may have ntralized the sexualy of the man ma a posthumo Christian superstar by a gay scholar/fan, but 's all still there. * c/l gay *
There has been a stir recent days around the Prbyterian Church Ameri’s latt General Assembly, where two new overtur were passed to addrs the ght issue of homosexualy and the pastorate. Overture 23 amends the nstutn to state that addn to practicg homosexualy, the e of “inty language” such as “gay Christian, ” “homosexual Christian, ” or “same-sex attracted Christian” n bar a man om mistry. Louis, argued that this was unacceptable and “hostile” to “gay people who want to follow J celibacy.
For several years, Johnson’s church has hosted the ntroversial “Revoice” nference, pched as a “safe space” for self-intified “gay Christians. ” While speakers haven’t affirmed gay sex acts, some of them affirm virtually everythg else about gay inty short of the actual sex acts. (See for stance, Grant Hartley’s 2018 and 2019 prentatns on the “queer treasure” to be found gay subculture.
AM I GAY? QUIZ – 100% RELIABLE TT
* c/l gay *
Further, as Johnson explas a recent podst wh Prton Sprkle, pluggg a forthg book, they see themselv not as upstarts but as throwbacks to Christian voic who “got right” the past before the rise of the ex-gay movement. Rears passgly faiar wh Lewis’s work might be stg about right now for what they uld possibly be referrg to, sce homosexualy was hardly a subject he treated equently. Lewis really thk about homosexualy?
We don’t have Van’s ial letter, but Lewis summariz that Van and Davy have beiend a uple of self-intified gay stunts seekg advice om Van, who turn is seekg advice om Lewis. ” This is notable for certa voic the mp tryg to leverage this text who have openly entertaed the ia of vowed “gay, chaste unns” of the kd here endorsed at the Spirual Friendship blog by Aaron Taylor. Even wh the provisn that one partner was gay and the other straight a “vowed iendship, ” Lewis clearly would have seen this as a eply unhealthy way of tryg to satisfy a privatn.
The homo. The posive life of the homo. A p male homo., now ad, once wrote to me—but of urse was the sort of letter one tak re to stroy.
There's a way to burst through the shame gay men are ma to feel about homosexualy. * c/l gay *
Lewis’s “p male homosexual” acquatance seems to have anticipated a le the Revoice playbook, namely that same-sex orientatn may not be an absolute ill but uld even be uniquely good, a thg to be channeled for unique social benefs. But shouldn’t be mistaken for a fully worked-out theology of homosexualy. I have mentned huy bee male homos.
This nails homosexual psychology general, and particular tak a p to the balloon of Revoice’s self-styled “prophetic wns” to the church. Revoice founrs like Nate Colls will claim that by virtue of their disorred sexualy (which, note, Lewis ntrasts wh “the normal type, ” implyg homosexualy is abnormal), they are able to stand apart om and above their “straight brothers and sisters” to issue a urse rrectn on “idolatry of the nuclear fay, ” etc. There’s nothg of any signifince to be gleaned om when we e to evaluate his opns on homosexualy as a mature Christian.
He might not have had Greev md when he referred to the “male homo. In ntemporary gay culture, he might have been scribed by a different t-word. ” He famoly says one reason for this is that homosexualy is one of only two ss he’s never personally been tempted by (the other beg gamblg).