Biblilly fahful Christians do not disapprove of Gay Pri the way non-Christians do. Christian disapproval is peculiar.
Contents:
- WOULD YOU ATTEND A GAY WEDDG?
- WHAT TO SAY TO A PASTOR WHO WANTS TO OFFICIATE A GAY WEDDG
- SHOULD A GAY COUPLE, ONCE CONVERTED, STAY ‘MARRIED’?
- HOW DO YOU RELATE TO A GAY FAY MEMBER?
- A PECULIAR DISAPPROVAL OF GAY PRI
WOULD YOU ATTEND A GAY WEDDG?
The unn of two men or women is not “gay marriage.” It’s no marriage. When they e to Christ, that former relatnship has no bdg thory. * desiring god gay wedding *
The apostle Pl said, “Do not be ceived: neher the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexualy, nor thiev, nor the greedy, nor dnkards, nor revilers, nor swdlers will her the kgdom of God” (1 Corthians 6:9–10).
That is why 1 Corthians 6:9–10 lists homosexual practice along wh others.
Do not be ceived: neher the sexually immoral [that is, fornitn, bee is distguished om the next two], nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexualy, nor thiev, nor the greedy, nor dnkards, nor revilers, nor swdlers will her the kgdom of God.
WHAT TO SAY TO A PASTOR WHO WANTS TO OFFICIATE A GAY WEDDG
If a loved one tells you he’s gay, ask God to give you wise love, urageo clary, and prayerful endurance. * desiring god gay wedding *
There are those who experimented wh homosexual acts for a season — maybe they were prison, maybe they were a teenager — and don’t anymore, and there are those who celebrate and pursue as normal. Pl’s pot is that if you embrace adultery as good and normal, or if you embrace stealg as good and normal, or if you embrace greed as good and normal, or if you embrace dnkenns as good and normal, or if you embrace homosexual terurse as good and normal, you will not enter the kgdom of heaven. J died so that heterosexual and homosexual sners might be saved.
SHOULD A GAY COUPLE, ONCE CONVERTED, STAY ‘MARRIED’?
For those who have forsaken God’s path of sexual fulfillment, and walked to homosexual terurse or heterosexual extramaral fornitn or adultery, J offers astonishg mercy. “What’s new is the normalizatn and stutnalizatn of homosexual behavr.
Alongsi s cleart explanatn of the s of homosexual terurse (Romans 1:24–27) stands the dictment of the approval and stutnalizatn of .
HOW DO YOU RELATE TO A GAY FAY MEMBER?
Though people know tuively that homosexual acts (along wh gossip, slanr, solence, hghts, boastg, fahlsns, heartlsns, thlsns) are s, “they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them” (Romans 1:29–32).
The new thg — new for Ameri, and new for history — is not homosexualy.
What’s new is not even the celebratn and approval of homosexual s. Homosexual behavr has been exploed, and reveled , and celebrated art, for lennia. But my qutn to you is this: Are we nsistent to not attend a homosexual weddg bee we do not affirm their sexual liftyle, yet be willg to attend a heterosexual weddg of unbelievers whose liftyle of premaral sex we also nnot affirm?
A PECULIAR DISAPPROVAL OF GAY PRI
Now, havg said all that, I thk is ordarily wrong to attend the ceremony of the so-lled gay marriage. He’s talkg about fornitn, not jt homosexualy. No, I would not remend that two men or two women livg together, practicg homosexualy, rema that relatnship.
The unn of two men and two women is not gay marriage — ’s no marriage.
I don’t like the ia that so many people are willg to e the term gay marriage stead of llg so-lled gay marriage, bee there is no such thg the universe as so-lled gay marriage. In other words, homosexual behavr is not wrong jt bee ’s mand that we don’t do . It’s not exactly the same issue when he rais alongsi homosexualy.