'Gay Girl, Good God' is an exprsive story that shar the thor's journey through life as a same-sex-attracted woman.
Contents:
REVIEW: GOD AND THE GAY CHRISTIAN
* god and gay book *
Some of my prev universy stunts, many of them bright stunts, have embraced the view that homosexualy is biblilly acceptable. I have seen this trend pecially among those who eher embraced homosexualy themselv or are close to others who have embraced this liftyle. I chose the book God and the Gay Christian bee appears to be the most popular book on the topic.
He attempts to make the se for the acceptabily of homosexualy wh the biblil rp. I would say that V prents two major arguments for the pro-homosexual posn.
Send, when the Scriptur speak of homosexualy, they are not talkg about the same type of homosexualy we are talkg about today. V then argued that homosexual unns of the variety he is proposg (monogamo, fahful, lovg, etc. On the oppose end, the church’s rejectn of homosexual unns leads to self-hatred, impaired liv, and often suici.
BT GAY ELV, GODS, DEY & WIZARDS
The are obvly negative, and therefore, the rejectn of homosexual unns sprgs om a rotten root.
First, V forms his argument such a way that Christians are opposg lovg, mted homosexual relatnships. But this is far om the norm wh the homosexual muny. Of urse, I am not nyg that there are homosexual upl who have embraced the valu; I am simply notg that is far om the norm.
There appears to be a ep nnectn between homosexualy and the breakg of God’s norms other realms (a nnectn I thk is borne out Romans 1). Acrdgly, if homosexualy is wrong, then censure by the church is a gift of grace, and the feelg of rejectn is signed to ll the sner to repentance.
GAY GIRL, GOOD GOD
A Different Kd of Homosexualy. 5), Pl’s statements about homosexualy Romans 1 (ch.
6), and the claim that gay people will not her the kgdom of God (1 Cor. In each se, V argu that the text may not mean what we thk means, but even if do, is talkg about a different type of homosexualy than we are talkg about today. Instead of alg wh the exegetil arguments, I want to foc on his re argument that the type of homosexualy spoken of the Bible is different than that of the ancient world.