gay | translate English to Rsian - Cambridge Dictnary

Contents:

• TRANSLATN OF GAY – ENGLISH–RSIAN DICTNARY
• TRANSLATN OF GAY – ENGLISH-SPANISH DICTNARY
• GAY

TRANSLATN OF GAY – ENGLISH–RSIAN DICTNARY

Neher sexually immoral people, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor passive homosexual partners, nor domant homosexual partners,. Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men of passive homosexual acts [μαλακοὶ], nor men of active homosexual acts [ἀρσενοκοῖται], [25]. You will notice that the argument om the 1946 project is false based on the 1881 English Revised Versn published Bra and the 1901 Amerin Standard Versn and the history of the term “homosexual.

The olr pre-1946 leral translatns words are very clear, “effemate [μαλακοὶ] [soft men], nor abers of themselv wh men [ἀρσενοκοῖται] [liers wh men], ” and the newer translatns: “men of passive homosexual acts [μαλακοὶ], nor men of active homosexual acts [ἀρσενοκοῖται]. As homosexualy of the 1980s had e out to the open, so there has been a jot effort to prent a new image to that manner of life.

The first known e of the term homosexual English is Charl Gilbert Chaddock’s 1892 translatn of Richard von Krafft-Ebg’s Psychopathia Sexualis, a study on sexual practic. Although some early wrers ed the adjective homosexual to refer to any sgle-genr ntext (such as an all-girls school), today the term impli a sexual aspect.

TRANSLATN OF GAY – ENGLISH-SPANISH DICTNARY

So, when the 1946 Project claims that the term homosexual was not ed the Bible before 1946, this is te bee was not a mon word at the time, and had a different meang the early days when the 1901 Amerin Standard Versn (ASV) was published or the 1881 English Revised Versn (ERV). This is why the 1946 Revised Standard Versn uld now e the word homosexual bee of a better unrstandg of Greek and the word was more mon by then and unrstood as two persons of the same sex havg ongog sexual relatns wh each other. So, the 1946 Project is misleadg their listeners when they make the claim that “homosexual” was not ed the Bible before 1946.

Executive produced by the director of the 2007 award-wng film, For the Bible Tells Me So, 1946: The Mistranslatn That Shifted a Culture is a new documentary that vtigat how the word “homosexual” was entered to the Bible, how one man tried to stop , and how a team of rearchers recently unearthed evince that challeng eply-held beliefs about LGBTQ+ people and their place God’s kgdom.

GAY

The first time the word “homosexual” appeared any bible was the Revised Standard Versn (RSV) published Febary 11, 1946. In the RSV’s translatn of 1 Corthians 6:9, the word “homosexual” was ed li of the Greek words “malakoi” and “arsenokoai.

Unfortunately, the revised versn of the RSV which replaced “homosexual” wh “sexual perverts” wasn’t published until 1971 — 25 years after the mistranslatn occurred.

Today, the mise of the word “homosexual” appears most translatns of the Bible, namely 1 Corthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10. Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men of passive homosexual acts, nor men of active homosexual acts, [25].

The two Greek terms (μαλακοὶ … ἀρσενοκοῖται) refer to passive men partners and active men partners nsensual homosexual acts. God nmng the practice of homosexualy at 1 Timothy 1:10, and the nmnatn and prohibn of homosexualy New Ttament tim by referrg to the historil example of Sodom and Gomorrah at Ju 7. The fact that Lat has no digeno word for such a person may suggt that a passive participant a homosexual relatnship was not nmned by Roman law so long as he was not a Roman cizen.

Homosexual acts between ee mal were regard wh ntempt bee one partner would have to take on the passive role (sertivy) sued only to women and slav (Veyne 1987: 204). Two close iends, Enlpi and Ascylt, fight over the sexual favors of their slave boy, Gon; but they never engage any homosexual act between themselv.

Pl is perhaps simply scribg sexual s general terms verse 24, although his more specific words vers 26–27 suggt that homosexual relatns may be his md verse 24 as well.

Jt as idolatry is a vlatn and perversn of what God tend, so too homosexual relatns are ntrary to what God planned when he created man and woman. [15] That homosexual relatns are ntrary to nature, the sense that they vlate what God tend, is munited sayg that women abandoned “the natural e for that which is ntrary to nature” (τὴν φυσικὴν χρῆσιν εἰς τὴν παρὰ φύσιν, tēn physikēn chrēs eis tēn para phys, v. Send, the phrase “ntrary to nature” (παρὰ φύσιν) is rooted Stoic and Hellenistic Jewish tradns that saw homosexual relatns as vlatns of the created orr (see below).

Some scholars argue that Pl do not nmn all forms of homosexualy, but only homosexual acts practiced by people who are “naturally” heterosexual (e. Instead, acrd wh Stoic and Hellenistic Jewish tradn, Pl rejects homosexualy as ntrary to the created orr—homosexual activy is a vlatn of what God tend when he created men and women (Hays 1986: 192–94; Malick 1993: 335). [21] Pl’s prohibn of all homosexual relatns is also supported by the unanimo rejectn of homosexualy Jewish sourc (see De Young 1990).