Proponents ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, opponents ague that marriage is primarily for procreatn.
Contents:
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
It is immoral to discrimate agast gays<span>—</span>and irratnal to make a relig eedom law Indiana the foc of the gay-rights movement. * gay marriage haven *
The Misdirected Zeal of Same-Sex Marriage ConvertsIt is immoral to discrimate agast gays—and irratnal to make a relig eedom law Indiana the foc of the gay-rights biggt afont to gay equaly Ameri today is the fact that same-sex upl 13 stat are still prevented om marryg. Overturng those laws is the most urgent gay-rights e. So is strange to see Indiana, where same-sex upl n and do wed, emerge as the foc of natnal ntroversy on gay e is Governor Mike Pence's cisn to sign legislatn lled the Relig Freedom Rtoratn Act.
Supporters of the law, like relig liberty expert Douglas Layck (a vol gay-marriage supporter), argue that s actual affect will almost certaly be to afford greater protectn to many relig mori.
COUNTRI WHERE GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL 2023
And he thks is unlikely to stymie gay rights.
"This puzzl 13 stat prohib gay-marriage outright, what sense do make for gay-rights supporters to boytt a different state where gay marriage is legal? Remend ReadgBeg barred om marriage puts a signifint burn on gay upl—a burn many orrs of magnu greater than the relatively small possibily of beg refed by an atypilly relig photographer or baker the urse of planng a same-sex weddg (the oute the law's opponents assert to be s te purpose).