Did you hear about the gay bakery Greenwich Village – Sweetie Pi, Cupk and More -- that refed to bake a weddg ke for a straight uple? Can you image? When asked why they refed, the two gay bakers – Adam and Steve – said, “While we have nothg agast straight people – some of our bt iends are heteros – we don’t thk straight people should fall to some ‘protected class.’ In other words, ’s our bakery and we n do whatever we want.”
Contents:
- SUPREME COURT TOSS LG AGAST BAKERS WHO REFED KE FOR GAY UPLE
- IN NARROW OPN, SUPREME COURT RUL FOR BAKER IN GAY-RIGHTS CASE
- US SUPREME COURT BACKS COLORADO BAKER'S GAY WEDDG KE SNUB
- 'THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME': WHY A GAY UPLE TOOK THEIR KE SE TO THE SUPREME URT
- THE COLORADO BAKERY THAT REFED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE IS ABOUT TO GET A SUPREME COURT RULG
- THE BAKER, THE GAY COUPLE AND THE WEDDG CAKE
- GAY WEDDG KE LG REAFFIRMS THAT BS N’T DISCRIMATE
- 13 GAY BAKERI REFE TO MAKE TRADNAL MARRIAGE CAKE WH THE MSAGE: 'GAY MARRIAGE IS WRONG'
- BERNARD GOLDBERG'S COMMENTARYSUBSCRIBESIGN {"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"NEWSARTICLE","URL":","MAENTYOFPAGE":","HEADLE":"WEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY CI","SCRIPTN":"DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE GAY BAKERY GREENWICH VILLAGE \U2013 SWEETIE PI, CUPK AND MORE -- THAT REFED TO BAKE A WEDDG KE FOR A STRAIGHT UPLE? CAN YOU IMAGE? WHEN ASKED WHY THEY REFED, THE TWO GAY BAKERS \U2013 ADAM AND STEVE \U2013 SAID, \U201CWHILE WE HAVE NOTHG AGAST STRAIGHT PEOPLE \U2013 SOME OF OUR BT IENDS ARE HETEROS \U2013 WE DON\U2019T THK STRAIGHT PEOPLE SHOULD FALL TO SOME \U2018PROTECTED CLASS.\U2019 IN OTHER WORDS, \U2019S OUR BAKERY AND WE N DO WHATEVER WE WANT.\U201D","IMAGE":[{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":"}],"DATEPUBLISHED":"2015-07-09T15:41:20+00:00","DATEMODIFIED":"2015-07-09T15:41:20+00:00","ISACCSIBLEFORFREE":TE,"THOR":[{"@TYPE":"PERSON","NAME":"BERNARD GOLDBERG","URL":","SCRIPTN":"CBS NEWS FOR 28 YEARS; FOX NEWS ANALYST FOR 10 YEARS; HBO REAL SPORTS RRPONNT FOR 22 YEARS; 14 EMMYS, 3 DUPONTS; 5 NYT BT SELLERS - #1 H BIAS.","INTIFIER":"ER:17023644","IMAGE":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"}}],"PUBLISHER":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","NAME":"BERNARD GOLDBERG'S COMMENTARY","URL":","SCRIPTN":"MEDIA AND POLIL ANALYSIS","TERACTNSTATISTIC":{"@TYPE":"INTERACTNCOUNTER","NAME":"SUBSCRIBERS","TERACTNTYPE":","ERINTERACTNCOUNT":1000},"INTIFIER":"PUB:321417","LOGO":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"},"IMAGE":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"}}}SHARE THIS POSTWEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY COPY LKFACEBOOKEMAILNOTOTHERWEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY CI
- I'M GAY & I BAKE. BUT DO THAT MAKE BAKG "GAY"?
- ‘GAY KE’ ROW: MAN LOS SEVEN-YEAR BATTLE AGAST BELFAST BAKERY
- UK SUPREME URT BACKS BAKERY THAT REFED TO MAKE GAY MARRIAGE KE
SUPREME COURT TOSS LG AGAST BAKERS WHO REFED KE FOR GAY UPLE
Rears disagree wh David Brooks’s argument that ligatn is not the bt way to promote gay marriage. * gay couple and bakery *
The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a lg agast two Oregon bakers who refed to bake a weddg ke for a lbian uple, Melissa and Aaron Kle, ced relig beliefs as their reason for not providg servic for a gay weddg. WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST FLORIST WHO REFUSED SERVICE FOR GAY COUPLE'S WEDDINGOn Monday, the Supreme Court sent the Kle se back down to a lower urt "for further nsiratn light of" their Colorado central disput the se -- which ps LGBT rights agast relig eedom nsiratns -- have yet to be addrsed by the Supreme Court.
IN NARROW OPN, SUPREME COURT RUL FOR BAKER IN GAY-RIGHTS CASE
Dpe anti-discrimatn laws many stat that require Christian bakery owners to bake k for same-sex weddgs, 13 LGBT and gay-owned bakeri objected to one man's requt when he asked if they'd make a pro-tradnal marriage ke that would read "gay marriage is wrong." All refed to back the ke and one person even cursed at the Christian man for "hate speech" and said a ke supportg tradnal marriage "went agast their beliefs." * gay couple and bakery *
Kle then said the bakery do not make k for gay weddgs, urt documents 's mother, who was wh her, said Kle quoted the Bible when explag his Kles had to pay a $135, 000 judgment to the uple for discrimatg agast them vlatn of a state public acmodatns statute.
The se began when a same-sex uple Colorado — Charlie Craig and Dave Mulls — filed a plat wh the state civil-rights missn after baker Jack Phillips told them that he did not sign ctom k for gay upl. Kennedy said is "unexceptnal" that Colorado law "n protect gay persons acquirg products and servic on the same terms and ndns that are offered to other members of the public, " but at the same time, "the law mt be applied a manner that is ntral toward relign.
Moreover, the state law at the time afford storekeepers some latu to cle creatg specific msag they nsired offensive, and the Colorado missn had prevly allowed three different bakers to refe to put an anti-gay msage on a ke. " Throughout the opn, Kennedy seemed to be balancg the ledger, tryg not to disturb public acmodatn laws like the one Colorado and reeratg that gay people may "not be treated as outsts. " While a member of the clergy clearly nnot be forced to nduct a weddg ceremony for a same-sex uple, vlatn of his relig views, Kennedy said, Colorado "n protect gay persons, jt as n protect other class of dividuals.
US SUPREME COURT BACKS COLORADO BAKER'S GAY WEDDG KE SNUB
* gay couple and bakery *
He closed by sayg that "the oute of s like this other circumstanc mt awa further elaboratn the urts, all the ntext of regnizg that the disput mt be rolved wh tolerance, whout undue disrpect to scere relig beliefs, and whout subjectg gay persons to digni when they seek goods and servic an open market. They argued that as the Colorado missn had prevly allowed bakers to refe to rate k wh anti-gay signs, the missn's cisn to le agast Phillips was herently nsistent and discrimated agast some relig groups. Image source, RtersImage ptn, Jack Phillips has temporarily stopped makg weddg kThe US Supreme Court has led favour of a baker Colorado who refed to make a weddg ke for a gay Colorado state urt had found that baker Jack Phillips' cisn to turn away David Mulls and Charlie Craig 2012 was unlawful the Supreme Court led on Monday a 7-2 vote that that cisn had vlated Mr Phillips' rights.
The nservative Christian ced his relig beliefs refg rights groups feared a lg agast the uple uld set a precent for treatg gay marriag differently om heterosexual the Supreme Court's verdict stead foc specifilly on Mr Phillips' se. The cisn do not state that florists, photographers, or other servic n now refe to work wh gay lg three years after the Supreme Court ma same-sex marriage the law of the land s landmark Obergefell v Hodg source, Getty ImagImage ptn, David Mulls (left) and Charlie Craig wanted a weddg ke to celebrate their planned marriageWhat did Monday's lg say?
'THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME': WHY A GAY UPLE TOOK THEIR KE SE TO THE SUPREME URT
Jtice Anthony Kennedy wrote that while Colorado law "n protect gay persons acquirg products and servic...
THE COLORADO BAKERY THAT REFED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE IS ABOUT TO GET A SUPREME COURT RULG
A siar 'gay ke' row is ongog Northern Ireland.
The Supreme Court Belfast has yet to release an opn on a lower urt lg that found the owners of a bakery discrimated agast a gay activist for refg to bake a ke wh the slogan "Support Gay Marriage" row began May 2014, when gay activist Gareth Lee placed an orr for a ke wh the gay marriage days later, the Christian-owned Ashers bakery ncelled the orr sayg "would ntradict their relig beliefs". ”An earlier cisn the Kern unty superr urt also went Miller’s way, but was later vated by the fifth district urt of appeal, which sent the lawsu back to the cisn as a Colorado baker is challengg a lg he vlated that state’s anti-discrimatn law by refg to make a ke celebratg a genr baker, Jack Phillips, separately won a partial US supreme urt victory after refg on relig grounds to make a gay uple’s weddg ke a ago. Colorado Civil Rights Commissn is, at base, a se volvg a Christian baker and bakery owner who refed to make a weddg ke for a gay uple bee of their sexual orientatn.
Owner and baker Jack Phillips refed, explag that he do not support gay marriage bee go agast his relig fah. • The uple’s attorney, Jam Esseks, told The New Yorker an terview earlier this year that bs owners n believe whatever they want to believe, and say whatever they want to say, cludg, for example, “‘I thk gay people shouldn’t be able to get married. Top urt to hear baker's relig objectn to makg ke for gay uple [Rters]• Jtic to Hear Case on Relig Objectns to Same-Sex Marriage [NYT]• Cake Shop Fac Legal Actn For Refg to Make Anti LGBT Cake [E].
THE BAKER, THE GAY COUPLE AND THE WEDDG CAKE
In a prev se, the seven-member missn had found Phillips vlatn of the state’s nondiscrimatn laws for refg service to a gay uple who orred a weddg ke 2012 (the Supreme Court overturned the missn’s cisn a narrow 2018 lg, fdg that s members displayed “clear and impermissible hostily” to relign) Colorado Civil Rights Commissn cled NBC News’ requt for ment, sayg that n’t ment on pendg the missn dropped Srda’s se, she filed a separate lawsu last June argug that Masterpiece Cakhop vlated both Colorado’s Anti-Discrimatn Act and the Colorado Consumer Protectn Act.
Kathryn Stt Osler/The Denver Post, via Getty ImagTo the Edor:Re “How Not to Advance Gay Marriage” (lumn, Dec. A baker, vlatn of Colorado’s anti-discrimatn law, ref to provi to a gay uple a service he provis to everyone else, and acrdg to Mr.
GAY WEDDG KE LG REAFFIRMS THAT BS N’T DISCRIMATE
(Bishop) GENE ROBINSONWASHINGTONThe wrer, the retired Epispal bishop of New Hampshire, was the first openly gay Epispal the Edor:I’m glad David Brooks remd that he fervently supports gay marriage. And y, “the ti of opn is quickly swgg favor of gay marriage.
Colorado Civil Rights Commissn, the Supreme Court se about a baker who refed to make a weddg ke for a gay uple, rais important qutns about public acmodatn, ee speech and relig David Brooks nigrat the importance of the se, sayg “’s jt a ke” rather somethg of mer, like a hoe or a job — which is not the pot.
Muny should be neighborly and patient the face of digni thrown at by evangelils bee, among other reasons, “the ti of opn is quickly swgg favor of gay marriage. ” But such tis n turn on a dime, as I have wnsed my own I me out 1979-80, the future was lookg bright for the gay muny.
13 GAY BAKERI REFE TO MAKE TRADNAL MARRIAGE CAKE WH THE MSAGE: 'GAY MARRIAGE IS WRONG'
Dozens of ci across the untry had enacted ordanc that protected lbian and gay people om discrimatn. One by one, ci repealed those anti-discrimatn ordanc, and lbians and gay men certa fields, like teachg, began to lose their jobs.
Brooks really thk for a mute that Jack Phillips would have e to dner at the home of a gay uple, and then been drawn like a fly to honey to bake their weddg ke? Brooks’s fantasy were to have e to un, what about all the other gay upl around the untry who would ntue to be nied their ke?
Brooks, but when you say that you “fervently support gay marriage” but oppose this lawsu, my rponse is: You n’t have your ke and eat , MAGID HARTMINNEAPOLISTo the Edor:Re “A Baker’s First Amendment Rights, ” by Robert P.
BERNARD GOLDBERG'S COMMENTARYSUBSCRIBESIGN {"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"NEWSARTICLE","URL":","MAENTYOFPAGE":","HEADLE":"WEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY CI","SCRIPTN":"DID YOU HEAR ABOUT THE GAY BAKERY GREENWICH VILLAGE \U2013 SWEETIE PI, CUPK AND MORE -- THAT REFED TO BAKE A WEDDG KE FOR A STRAIGHT UPLE? CAN YOU IMAGE? WHEN ASKED WHY THEY REFED, THE TWO GAY BAKERS \U2013 ADAM AND STEVE \U2013 SAID, \U201CWHILE WE HAVE NOTHG AGAST STRAIGHT PEOPLE \U2013 SOME OF OUR BT IENDS ARE HETEROS \U2013 WE DON\U2019T THK STRAIGHT PEOPLE SHOULD FALL TO SOME \U2018PROTECTED CLASS.\U2019 IN OTHER WORDS, \U2019S OUR BAKERY AND WE N DO WHATEVER WE WANT.\U201D","IMAGE":[{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":"}],"DATEPUBLISHED":"2015-07-09T15:41:20+00:00","DATEMODIFIED":"2015-07-09T15:41:20+00:00","ISACCSIBLEFORFREE":TE,"THOR":[{"@TYPE":"PERSON","NAME":"BERNARD GOLDBERG","URL":","SCRIPTN":"CBS NEWS FOR 28 YEARS; FOX NEWS ANALYST FOR 10 YEARS; HBO REAL SPORTS RRPONNT FOR 22 YEARS; 14 EMMYS, 3 DUPONTS; 5 NYT BT SELLERS - #1 H BIAS.","INTIFIER":"ER:17023644","IMAGE":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"}}],"PUBLISHER":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","NAME":"BERNARD GOLDBERG'S COMMENTARY","URL":","SCRIPTN":"MEDIA AND POLIL ANALYSIS","TERACTNSTATISTIC":{"@TYPE":"INTERACTNCOUNTER","NAME":"SUBSCRIBERS","TERACTNTYPE":","ERINTERACTNCOUNT":1000},"INTIFIER":"PUB:321417","LOGO":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"},"IMAGE":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","NTENTURL":","THUMBNAILURL":"}}}SHARE THIS POSTWEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY COPY LKFACEBOOKEMAILNOTOTHERWEDDG CAK FOR GAY COUPL ... AND SANCTUARY CI
A versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn SR, Page 8 of the New York edn wh the headle: A Baker’s Rebuff of a Gay Couple. Some people might dismiss the prcipl at stake the Masterpiece Cakhop se by argug that a gay uple n simply purchase their ke elsewhere.
I'M GAY & I BAKE. BUT DO THAT MAKE BAKG "GAY"?
If a pany n refe to sell weddg k to a gay uple on the basis of relig nvictns, n a rtrant also then refe to serve food to a divorcée or an unmarried uple wh a child?
”In McPherson’s re-tellg to Bowman-Cryer and her fiancee, Lrel, that msage morphed somewhat: She said Kle had lled them both “abomatns” bee they were gay.
‘GAY KE’ ROW: MAN LOS SEVEN-YEAR BATTLE AGAST BELFAST BAKERY
In a 2018 cisn, the urt tossed out a Colorado lg agast a baker who refed to serve a gay uple on relig grounds, fdg the state had shown bias agast his relign while makg s cisn. A gay Texas uple is speakg out after a lol bakery rejected their requt for a weddg ke bee s owners oppose same-sex marriage. We don't provi k for homosexual marriag, '" she told The Longview News-Journal.
UK SUPREME URT BACKS BAKERY THAT REFED TO MAKE GAY MARRIAGE KE
"Delorme said she would also refe to prepare a ke for her nephew, who she said is openly gay, and has turned down offers to prepare "alhol-related" and "risqué" nfectns the past. "If I went to a baker, a homosexual baker, and they didn't want to provi a ke for an event that maybe celebrated marriage between a man and a woman, " she told The Longview News-Journal, "[] would be OK for them to say, 'That's not le wh our valu.