A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her.
Contents:
- U.S. SUPREME COURT LEANS TOWARD WEB SIGNER WH ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE STANCE
- THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
U.S. SUPREME COURT LEANS TOWARD WEB SIGNER WH ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE STANCE
A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led uld refe to make a weddg webse for gay upl had ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. * anti gay web designer *
She preemptively sued Colorado's civil rights missn and other state officials 2016 bee she feared she would be punished for refg to serve gay weddgs unr Colorado's public acmodatns law.
The pany jt nnot refe to serve gay upl, as seeks to do here, jt as a Christmas store nnot announce, 'No Jews allowed, '" Olson said. " Alo urt has bee creasgly supportive of relig rights and related ee speech claims recent years even as has backed LGBT rights other s such as s landmark 2015 cisn legalizg gay marriage natnwi. A lg is expected by the end of Supreme Court 2018 led favor of Jack Phillips, a Christian Denver-area baker who refed on relig grounds to make a weddg ke for a gay uple.
THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
In a feat for gay rights, the Supreme Court’s nservative majory led Friday, June 30, 2023, Smh who wants to sign weddg webs n refe to work wh same-sex upl (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File). In a feat for gay rights, the Supreme Court’s nservative majory led Friday, June 30, 2023, Smh who wants to sign weddg webs n refe to work wh same-sex upl. The cisn is a feat for gay rights.
Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh requt dispute, om a person intified as “Stewart, ” wasn’t the basis for the feral lawsu filed preemptively seven years ago by web signer Lorie Smh, before she started makg weddg webs.
But as the se advanced, was referenced by her attorneys when lawyers for the state of Colorado prsed Smh on whether she had sufficient grounds to revelatn distracts om Smh’s victory at a time when she might have been baskg her w, which is wily nsired a setback for gay rights. Supreme Court victory after refg to make a gay uple’s weddg ke, cg his Christian fah.