Contents:
- SEVEN GAY TEXTS: BIBLIL PASSAG USED TO CONMN HOMOSEXUALY
- SEVEN GAY TEXTS: BIBLIL PASSAG USED TO CONMN HOMOSEXUALY [PDF]
SEVEN GAY TEXTS: BIBLIL PASSAG USED TO CONMN HOMOSEXUALY
tle={Seven Gay Texts: Biblil Passag Used to Conmn Homosexualy},. url={}There are seven texts often ced by Christians to nmn homosexualy: Noah and Ham (Genis 9:20–27), Sodom and Gomorrah (Genis 19:1–11), Levil laws nmng same-sex relatnships (Levic 18:22, 20:13), two words two Send Ttament vice lists (1 Corthians 6:9–10; 1 Timothy 1:10), and Pl's letter to the Romans (Romans 1:26–27). The thor believ that the do not refer to homosexual relatnships between two ee, adult, and lovg dividuals.
1177/0146107915577097 Gay Texts: Biblil Passag Used to Conmn HomosexualyRobert K. GneAbstractThere are seven texts often ced by Christians to nmn homosexualy: Noah and Ham (Genis 9:20-27), Sodom and Gomorrah (Genis 19:1-11), Levil laws nmng same-sex relatnships (Levic 18:22, 20:13), two words two Send Ttament vice lists (1 Corthians 6:9–10; 1 Timothy 1:10), and Pl’s letter to the Romans (Romans 1:26-27). If the biblil thors did assume homosexualy was evil, we do not theologize off of their cultural assumptns, we theologize off of the texts we have the non.
The thor attempts to troduce some new arguments to this long-standg and passnate words: homosexualy, cultic prostutn, perasty, Isis Cult Rome, Sodom, Noah, Ham, Lot, Levil Laws, Vice Lists, Pl, letter to RomansRobert Gne, Ph.
SEVEN GAY TEXTS: BIBLIL PASSAG USED TO CONMN HOMOSEXUALY [PDF]
Wh recent years passnate bat have been rried on wh Amerin Christian nomatns over the issue of acceptg homosexuals as members good standg wh ngregatns and acceptg actively practicg gay men and women as clergy. A number of years ago I offered to addrs the regnal nventn of votg lay and clergy legat the nomatn to which I belong as a clergyperson (Tex-as-Louisiana Gulf Coast Synod of the Evangelil Lutheran Church of Ameri) on the topic of what the Bible says about homosexualy. I was told that would be wise for me not to do so, for although the clergy would unrstand my pren-tatn, would e distrs for the lay, pecially sce I would advote that dividual biblil passag do not direct-ly nmn homosexualy between two lovg, ee adults.