Feral civil rights law protects gay, lbian and transgenr workers, the Supreme Court led Monday.
Contents:
WHAT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE LG MEANS FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS
The lg sid wh 20 state attorneys general who sued the Bin admistratn over guil on rights for gay and transgenr workers and stunts. * gay law verdict *
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe lg sid wh 20 state attorneys general who sued the Bin admistratn over guil on rights for gay and transgenr workers and Luis Magana/Agence France-Prse — Getty ImagA feral judge on Friday temporarily blocked the Bin admistratn om enforcg directiv that extend civil rights protectns to L. Stunts and lg roughly one year after a group of 20 nservative state attorneys general filed a lawsu agast two feral agenci for their terpretatn of the 1972 landmark civil rights statute known as Tle IX, which prohibed sex-based discrimatn tnal programs and activi that receive feral fundg, and Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibed employers om discrimatg agast workers based on race, relign or year, those agenci, the Department of Edutn and the Equal Employment Opportuny Commissn, followg guidance om Print Bin, said the protectns afford unr Tle IX and Tle VII extend to gay and transgenr dividuals and would be enforced workplac and those directiv, the agenci said that pani and schools uld not ny a transgenr person accs to a bathroom that rrpond to that dividual’s genr inty. The attorneys general also said the admistratn vlated feral law bee did not follow proper procs implementg those Bin admistratn argued that the regulatns were nsistent wh a 2020 Supreme Court lg that said Tle VII prevented employers om firg someone for beg gay or transgenr.
Gorsuch, wrg for the majory, said that “ is impossible to discrimate agast a person for beg homosexual or transgenr whout discrimatg agast that dividual based on sex. ”Before that cisn, was legal more than half of the stat to fire workers for beg gay, bisexual or state attorneys general had argued their se that the thory on the issu “properly belongs to Congrs, the Stat, and the people. “The worry is that this provis a green light to any bs owner that they n refe service to any person on the basis of their inty, whether they’re gay or lbian, or Jewish or Black, or anythg, bee they have an objectn to those sorts of people beg their bs, ” said Kathere Franke, a profsor at Columbia Law School.