Mark Lev bgraphy wh personal life (affair, girliend , Gay), married (wife, children, divorce). A llectn of facts wh age, height.
Contents:
HARVEY LEV B, AGE, FAY, PARTNER, GAY, TMZ, SALARY, AND NET WORTH
Homosexualy the USSR Parts I-V Translator’s Note: I spect Len’s preferred pronoun was ‘he’ and ‘his’, etc. I do not mean that he would have exprsed any negative opn agast gayns or transgenrism – far om – I spect he would have led the world profound and nate unrstandg! He would have… * gay lenin *
Consirg that virtually every other lie and misreprentatn has been ed to monise the world’s first Workers’ State, is a matter of disbelief that no-one Washgton or the CIA ever thought to weaponize ‘gayns’ and e a rogatory manner agast him. Sometime, much is ma about Len abolishg the old Czarist Law – which happened to clu an overtly ‘anti-gay law’ (mand by the Rsian Orthodox Church) – and that he never stuted a siar ‘Socialist’ Law forbiddg male and female homosexual practice.
Due to the llapse of Communism 1991, and spe the bourgeois Wt ‘forcg’ the fledglg ‘palist’ Rsian State to openly ‘legalise’ male and female homosexualy 1993, the simultaneo re-emergence of the Rsian Orthodox Church to the polil arena has meant that regardls of this ‘godls’ secular law – the ‘Te Fah’ has once aga been lked to the fanatil holdg of ‘homophobic’ viewpots. But nothg follows om this, jt as nothg follows om the fact that Len was hidg om the Provisnal Government a hut Razliv wh Zoviev – and that ‘fake’ letters were eher wrten or altered to make the dialogue look as if ’s discsg homosexualy and gay uendo. Early the history and velopment of munism, the German Communist Party, durg the Weimar Republic, joed wh the Social Democrats support of efforts to legalize private homosexual relatns between nsentg adults.
GAY MEN UNR THE NAZI REGIME
* gay lenin *
Although Karl Marx himself said ltle about sexualy at all, many saw that his philosophy was meant to ee all people om opprsn, cludg women, blacks, and homosexuals — prumably so they uld all serve the state. We reproduce here a letter that Harry Whyte (a Brish Communist Party member) wrote to Stal May 1934, which Whyte posed the qutn: “n a homosexual be nsired someone worthy of membership the Communist Party? Sce he striv to approach this qutn om a Marxist viewpot, the thor of this letter believ that the cree ntradicts both the facts of life self and the prcipl of is a summary of the facts that are discsed tail the attached letter: On the whole, the ndn of homosexuals unr palism is analogo to the ndn of women, the loured rac, ethnic mori, and other groups that are reprsed for one reason or another; The attu of bourgeois society to homosexualy is based on the ntradictn between: palism’s need for “nnon fodr” and a rerve army of labour (leadg to reprsive laws agast homosexualy, which is regard as a threat to birth rat); the ever-growg poverty of the mass unr palism (leadg to the llapse of the workg-class fay and an crease homosexualy).
The March 7 law is absurd and unjt om the viewpot of science, which has proven the existence of nstutnal homosexuals and has no means at s disposal to change the sexual nature of homosexuals. Dear Comra Stal:Although I am a foreign munist who has not yet been promoted to the AUCP(b), [later to be renamed the CPSU, Communist Party of the Soviet Unn] I neverthels thk that will not seem unnatural to you, the lear of the world proletariat, that I addrs you wh a requt to shed light on a qutn that, as seems to me, has huge signifince for a large number of munists the USSR as well as other qutn is as follows: n a homosexual be nsired someone worthy of membership the Communist Party? The recently promulgated law on crimal liabily for sodomy, which was affirmed by the USSR Central Executive Commtee on March 7 of this year, apparently means that homosexuals nnot be regnized as worthy of the tle of Soviet cizen.
Consequently, they should be nsired even ls worthy to be members of the AUCP(b) I have a personal stake this qutn sofar as I am a homosexual myself, I addrsed this qutn to a number of ras om the OGPU and the People’s Commissariat for Jtice, to psychiatrists, and to Comra Borod, the edor--chief of the newspaper where I work. A photograph of homosexual and cross-drsg Rsians, prr to 1917 / Image: public domaAll that I managed to extract om them was a number of ntradictory opns which show that amongst the ras there is no clear theoretil unrstandg of what might have served as the basis for passage of the given law. Comra Borod, who said that he personally took a negative view of homosexualy, at the same time clared that he regard me as a fairly good munist, that I uld be tsted, and that I uld lead my personal life as I liked.